Clinical impact of hyperbaric oxygen therapy combined with steroid treatment for sudden sensorineural hearing loss: A case–control study

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1002/lio2.1297
Naoya Sanda MD, Michi Sawabe MD, PhD, Kayoko Kabaya MD, PhD, Momoko Kawaguchi MD, Akina Fukushima MD, Yoshihisa Nakamura MD, PhD, Shinichiro Maseki MD, PhD, Masaki Niwa MD, Hiroki Mori MD, Yoshiyuki Hyodo PG Dip, Kazuyoshi Nishiyama BE, Daisuke Kawakita MD, PhD, Shinichi Iwasaki MD, PhD
{"title":"Clinical impact of hyperbaric oxygen therapy combined with steroid treatment for sudden sensorineural hearing loss: A case–control study","authors":"Naoya Sanda MD,&nbsp;Michi Sawabe MD, PhD,&nbsp;Kayoko Kabaya MD, PhD,&nbsp;Momoko Kawaguchi MD,&nbsp;Akina Fukushima MD,&nbsp;Yoshihisa Nakamura MD, PhD,&nbsp;Shinichiro Maseki MD, PhD,&nbsp;Masaki Niwa MD,&nbsp;Hiroki Mori MD,&nbsp;Yoshiyuki Hyodo PG Dip,&nbsp;Kazuyoshi Nishiyama BE,&nbsp;Daisuke Kawakita MD, PhD,&nbsp;Shinichi Iwasaki MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/lio2.1297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of present study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) as a primary therapy combined with standard systemic corticosteroid treatment for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) compared to treatment without the use of HBOT (non-HBOT) through clinical data and advanced analytical approaches.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Design</h3>\n \n <p>Case–control study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Conducted across three Japanese medical centers involving 298 SSNHL patients diagnosed between 2020 and 2023. Inclusion criteria encompassed first onset and treatment, WHO grade 3 or 4 initial hearing impairment, receipt of systemic corticosteroid therapy within 14 days of symptom onset, and initiation of HBOT within the same timeframe for the case group. The primary outcome measure was the difference in hearing improvement (mean hearing level in decibels, dB) between the two groups, assessed by pure-tone audiometry at baseline and 3 months post-treatment, using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method adjusted for covariate differences.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The study included 67 patients in the HBOT group and 68 in the non-HBOT group. The HBOT group exhibited significantly greater hearing improvement (IPTW-adjusted difference: 7.6 dB, 95% CI 0.4–14.7; <i>p</i> = 0.038). Patients without vertigo in the HBOT group demonstrated substantial hearing improvement (11.5 dB, 95% CI 2.3–20.6; <i>p</i> = 0.014), whereas those with vertigo showed no significant improvement (−1.8 dB, 95% CI −11.8–8.3; <i>p</i> = 0.729). The HBOT group also had a significantly higher association with complete recovery (IPTW-adjusted odds ratio: 2.57, 95% CI 1.13–5.85; <i>p</i> = 0.025).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In SSHNL, HBOT combination therapy yielded slightly but significantly improved hearing outcomes compared to non-HBOT treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>4.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48529,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lio2.1297","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.1297","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of present study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) as a primary therapy combined with standard systemic corticosteroid treatment for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) compared to treatment without the use of HBOT (non-HBOT) through clinical data and advanced analytical approaches.

Study Design

Case–control study.

Methods

Conducted across three Japanese medical centers involving 298 SSNHL patients diagnosed between 2020 and 2023. Inclusion criteria encompassed first onset and treatment, WHO grade 3 or 4 initial hearing impairment, receipt of systemic corticosteroid therapy within 14 days of symptom onset, and initiation of HBOT within the same timeframe for the case group. The primary outcome measure was the difference in hearing improvement (mean hearing level in decibels, dB) between the two groups, assessed by pure-tone audiometry at baseline and 3 months post-treatment, using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method adjusted for covariate differences.

Results

The study included 67 patients in the HBOT group and 68 in the non-HBOT group. The HBOT group exhibited significantly greater hearing improvement (IPTW-adjusted difference: 7.6 dB, 95% CI 0.4–14.7; p = 0.038). Patients without vertigo in the HBOT group demonstrated substantial hearing improvement (11.5 dB, 95% CI 2.3–20.6; p = 0.014), whereas those with vertigo showed no significant improvement (−1.8 dB, 95% CI −11.8–8.3; p = 0.729). The HBOT group also had a significantly higher association with complete recovery (IPTW-adjusted odds ratio: 2.57, 95% CI 1.13–5.85; p = 0.025).

Conclusion

In SSHNL, HBOT combination therapy yielded slightly but significantly improved hearing outcomes compared to non-HBOT treatment.

Level of Evidence

4.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高压氧疗法联合类固醇治疗对突发性感音神经性听力损失的临床影响:病例对照研究
研究目的 本研究旨在通过临床数据和先进的分析方法,评估高压氧疗法(HBOT)作为主要疗法与标准全身性皮质类固醇疗法相结合治疗突发性感音神经性听力损失(SSNHL)的临床疗效。 研究设计 病例对照研究。 方法 在日本三家医疗中心开展,涉及 2020 年至 2023 年期间确诊的 298 名 SSNHL 患者。纳入标准包括首次发病和治疗、WHO 3 级或 4 级初始听力损伤、发病后 14 天内接受过全身皮质类固醇治疗,以及病例组在相同时间内开始接受 HBOT 治疗。主要结果指标是两组患者听力改善程度的差异(平均听力水平,以分贝为单位,dB),分别在基线和治疗后 3 个月通过纯音测听进行评估,采用逆概率治疗加权法(IPTW)对协变量差异进行调整。 研究结果 HBOT 组有 67 名患者,非 HBOT 组有 68 名患者。HBOT 组的听力改善幅度明显更大(IPTW 调整后的差异:7.6 dB,95% CI 0.4-14.7; p = 0.038)。HBOT 组无眩晕患者的听力改善幅度较大(11.5 dB,95% CI 2.3-20.6;p = 0.014),而眩晕患者的听力改善幅度不大(-1.8 dB,95% CI -11.8-8.3;p = 0.729)。HBOT 组完全康复的几率也明显更高(IPTW 调整后的几率比:2.57,95% CI 1.13-5.85;p = 0.025)。 结论 在 SSHNL 中,与非 HBOT 治疗相比,HBOT 综合疗法能轻微但显著地改善听力状况。 证据等级 4。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Challenges and outcomes of airway surgery in a post-war low-resource setting: A case series from Mekelle, Ethiopia. Challenges and outcomes of airway surgery in a post-war low-resource setting: A case series from Mekelle, Ethiopia Automated classification of online reviews of otolaryngologists Individualized post-operative prediction of cochlear implantation outcomes in children with prelingual deafness using functional near-infrared spectroscopy Causes and treatment of secondary sphenoid sinus infection post-endoscopic transsphenoidal approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1