Comparing the clinical characteristics and outcomes of septic shock children with and without malignancies: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Jornal de pediatria Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jped.2024.06.003
Haixin Huang, Ruichen Zhang, Jian Chen, Hongxing Dang, Chengjun Liu, Siwei Lu, Yue-Qiang Fu
{"title":"Comparing the clinical characteristics and outcomes of septic shock children with and without malignancies: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Haixin Huang, Ruichen Zhang, Jian Chen, Hongxing Dang, Chengjun Liu, Siwei Lu, Yue-Qiang Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.jped.2024.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is an amelioration in mortality rates of septic shock patients with malignancies over time, but it remains uncertain in children. Therefore, the authors endeavored to compare the clinical characteristics, treatment needs, and outcomes of septic shock children with or without malignancies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors retrospectively analyzed the data of children admitted to the PICU due to septic shock from January 2015 to December 2022 in a tertiary pediatric hospital. The main outcome was in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 508 patients were enrolled. The proportion of Gram-negative bacteria and fungal infections in children with malignancies was significantly higher than those without malignancies. Septic shock children with malignancies had a longer length of stay (LOS) in the hospital (21 vs. 11 days, p<0.001). However, there were no statistically significant differences in the LOS of PICU (5 vs. 5 days, p = 0.591), in-hospital mortality (43.0 % vs. 49.4 %, p = 0.276), and 28-day mortality (49.2 % vs. 44.7 %, p = 0.452). The 28-day survival analysis (p = 0.314) also showed no significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although there are significant differences in the bacterial spectrum of infections, the septic shock children with or without malignancies showed a similar mortality rate. The septic shock children with malignancies had longer LOS of the hospital.</p>","PeriodicalId":14867,"journal":{"name":"Jornal de pediatria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal de pediatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2024.06.003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: There is an amelioration in mortality rates of septic shock patients with malignancies over time, but it remains uncertain in children. Therefore, the authors endeavored to compare the clinical characteristics, treatment needs, and outcomes of septic shock children with or without malignancies.

Methods: The authors retrospectively analyzed the data of children admitted to the PICU due to septic shock from January 2015 to December 2022 in a tertiary pediatric hospital. The main outcome was in-hospital mortality.

Results: A total of 508 patients were enrolled. The proportion of Gram-negative bacteria and fungal infections in children with malignancies was significantly higher than those without malignancies. Septic shock children with malignancies had a longer length of stay (LOS) in the hospital (21 vs. 11 days, p<0.001). However, there were no statistically significant differences in the LOS of PICU (5 vs. 5 days, p = 0.591), in-hospital mortality (43.0 % vs. 49.4 %, p = 0.276), and 28-day mortality (49.2 % vs. 44.7 %, p = 0.452). The 28-day survival analysis (p = 0.314) also showed no significant differences.

Conclusion: Although there are significant differences in the bacterial spectrum of infections, the septic shock children with or without malignancies showed a similar mortality rate. The septic shock children with malignancies had longer LOS of the hospital.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较患有和未患有恶性肿瘤的脓毒性休克患儿的临床特征和预后:一项回顾性队列研究。
目的:随着时间的推移,患有恶性肿瘤的脓毒性休克患者的死亡率有所下降,但儿童患者的死亡率仍不确定。因此,作者试图比较有无恶性肿瘤的脓毒性休克患儿的临床特征、治疗需求和预后:作者回顾性分析了一家三级儿科医院2015年1月至2022年12月因脓毒性休克入住PICU的患儿数据。主要结果是院内死亡率:结果:共有508名患者入院。恶性肿瘤患儿的革兰氏阴性菌和真菌感染比例明显高于非恶性肿瘤患儿。患有恶性肿瘤的脓毒症休克患儿的住院时间(LOS)更长(21 天对 11 天,p):虽然感染的细菌谱存在明显差异,但患有或未患有恶性肿瘤的脓毒性休克患儿的死亡率相似。患有恶性肿瘤的脓毒性休克患儿的住院时间更长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Jornal de pediatria
Jornal de pediatria 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
93
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Jornal de Pediatria is a bimonthly publication of the Brazilian Society of Pediatrics (Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria, SBP). It has been published without interruption since 1934. Jornal de Pediatria publishes original articles and review articles covering various areas in the field of pediatrics. By publishing relevant scientific contributions, Jornal de Pediatria aims at improving the standards of pediatrics and of the healthcare provided for children and adolescents in general, as well to foster debate about health.
期刊最新文献
Adolescents' healthcare decisional capacity in the clinical context: a theoretical study and model. Central auditory system assessment in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis: electrophysiology and central auditory processing. Effect of video-based interventions on emergence delirium in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Effectiveness of physiological flexion swaddling and oromotor interventions in improving preterm infants' oral feeding ability in the NICU: a randomized controlled trial. Electronic cigarettes: "wolves in sheep's clothing".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1