Validation of the area under the Watts factor curve during the voiding cycle as a novel parameter for diagnosing detrusor underactivity in females.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY International Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1111/iju.15531
Takeya Kitta, Naoki Wada, Satoshi Shinohara, Nagisa Hayashi, Hayato Yamamura, Takayuki Yamamoto, Haruka Takagi, Tsubasa Hatakeyama, Masaya Nagabuchi, Shun Morishita, Ryouken Tsunekawa, Miyu Ohtani, Shin Kobayashi, Jun-Ichi Hori, Hidehiro Kakizaki
{"title":"Validation of the area under the Watts factor curve during the voiding cycle as a novel parameter for diagnosing detrusor underactivity in females.","authors":"Takeya Kitta, Naoki Wada, Satoshi Shinohara, Nagisa Hayashi, Hayato Yamamura, Takayuki Yamamoto, Haruka Takagi, Tsubasa Hatakeyama, Masaya Nagabuchi, Shun Morishita, Ryouken Tsunekawa, Miyu Ohtani, Shin Kobayashi, Jun-Ichi Hori, Hidehiro Kakizaki","doi":"10.1111/iju.15531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Detrusor underactivity (DU) is a common cause of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). To date, no consensus has been reached on the urodynamic criteria for defining DU. We previously proposed the area under the curve of the Watts factor (WF-AUC) as a new parameter for diagnosing DU. By comparing previously reported five criteria for DU and WF-AUC, we analyzed whether the WF-AUC could assess detrusor contraction in women with LUTS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using urodynamic data of consecutive 77 women with LUTS, first, we classified DU based on previously reported five criteria. Second, we assessed the potential correlation between multiple parameters and WF-AUC. Third, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine the cutoff value of WF-AUC for diagnosing DU based on previously reported five criteria. Fourth, a linear regression analysis was conducted and compared using multiple criteria and female bladder outlet obstruction index (BOOIf).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>WF-AUC was positively correlated with the maximum values of WF, bladder contractility index (BCI), and projected isovolumetric pressure 1 (PIP1) with correlation coefficients of 0.63, 0.57, and 0.34, respectively. AUC for diagnosing DU based on previously reported five criteria ranging from 0.773 to 0.896 with different cutoff values of AUC-WF. The Spearman's correlation test revealed that BOOIf was significantly correlated with BCI, but not W<sub>max</sub>, PIP1 and WF-AUC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated the non-inferiority of the WF-AUC compared to previously reported criteria for defining DU. Depending on the cutoff value, the WF-AUC could appropriately evaluate women with DU, regardless of the presence of BOO.</p>","PeriodicalId":14323,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.15531","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Detrusor underactivity (DU) is a common cause of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). To date, no consensus has been reached on the urodynamic criteria for defining DU. We previously proposed the area under the curve of the Watts factor (WF-AUC) as a new parameter for diagnosing DU. By comparing previously reported five criteria for DU and WF-AUC, we analyzed whether the WF-AUC could assess detrusor contraction in women with LUTS.

Methods: Using urodynamic data of consecutive 77 women with LUTS, first, we classified DU based on previously reported five criteria. Second, we assessed the potential correlation between multiple parameters and WF-AUC. Third, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine the cutoff value of WF-AUC for diagnosing DU based on previously reported five criteria. Fourth, a linear regression analysis was conducted and compared using multiple criteria and female bladder outlet obstruction index (BOOIf).

Results: WF-AUC was positively correlated with the maximum values of WF, bladder contractility index (BCI), and projected isovolumetric pressure 1 (PIP1) with correlation coefficients of 0.63, 0.57, and 0.34, respectively. AUC for diagnosing DU based on previously reported five criteria ranging from 0.773 to 0.896 with different cutoff values of AUC-WF. The Spearman's correlation test revealed that BOOIf was significantly correlated with BCI, but not Wmax, PIP1 and WF-AUC.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated the non-inferiority of the WF-AUC compared to previously reported criteria for defining DU. Depending on the cutoff value, the WF-AUC could appropriately evaluate women with DU, regardless of the presence of BOO.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
验证排尿周期中瓦特系数曲线下面积作为诊断女性逼尿肌活动不足的新参数。
目的:逼尿肌活动不足(DU)是导致下尿路症状(LUTS)的常见原因。迄今为止,人们尚未就定义 DU 的尿动力学标准达成共识。我们曾提出将瓦特因子曲线下面积(WF-AUC)作为诊断 DU 的新参数。通过比较之前报道的五种 DU 标准和 WF-AUC,我们分析了 WF-AUC 是否能评估 LUTS 女性患者的逼尿肌收缩情况:方法: 利用连续 77 名 LUTS 女性的尿动力学数据,首先,我们根据之前报道的五项标准对 DU 进行了分类。第二,我们评估了多个参数与 WF-AUC 之间的潜在相关性。第三,我们进行了接收者操作特征曲线分析,以确定根据之前报道的五项标准诊断 DU 的 WF-AUC 临界值。第四,使用多重标准和女性膀胱出口梗阻指数(BOOIf)进行线性回归分析和比较:结果:WF-AUC 与 WF 最大值、膀胱收缩力指数(BCI)和预测等容压力 1(PIP1)呈正相关,相关系数分别为 0.63、0.57 和 0.34。根据之前报道的五项标准诊断 DU 的 AUC 为 0.773 至 0.896,AUC-WF 的临界值各不相同。斯皮尔曼相关性检验显示,BOOIf 与 BCI 显著相关,但与 Wmax、PIP1 和 WF-AUC 无关:本研究表明,与之前报道的 DU 定义标准相比,WF-AUC 并无劣势。根据截断值的不同,WF-AUC 可以对患有 DU 的女性进行适当的评估,无论是否存在 BOO。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Urology
International Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
11.50%
发文量
340
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Urology is the official English language journal of the Japanese Urological Association, publishing articles of scientific excellence in urology. Submissions of papers from all countries are considered for publication. All manuscripts are subject to peer review and are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation.
期刊最新文献
Comparative clinical trials with a novel approach: Utilizing the shiny method for investigational urothelial carcinoma therapies. Feasibility of approximate measurement of bladder volume in children using the Lilium α-200 portable bladder scanner. The role of lipidic balance on erectile dysfunction in prostate cancer patients undergoing robotic surgery. Efficacy and safety of dose-dense gemcitabine plus cisplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Preservation of the native urethral plate and corpus spongiosum combined with buccal mucosa graft plus Orandi's penile skin flap as an alternative to staged urethroplasty for narrow penile strictures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1