A systematic literature review on patient-reported outcome domains and measures in nonsurgical efficacy trials related to chronic pain associated with endometriosis: an urgent call to action.

IF 5.9 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY PAIN® Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003290
Daniela Constanze Rosenberger, Emilia Mennicken, Iris Schmieg, Terkia Medkour, Marie Pechard, Juliane Sachau, Fabian Fuchtmann, Judy Birch, Kathrin Schnabel, Katy Vincent, Ralf Baron, Didier Bouhassira, Esther Miriam Pogatzki-Zahn
{"title":"A systematic literature review on patient-reported outcome domains and measures in nonsurgical efficacy trials related to chronic pain associated with endometriosis: an urgent call to action.","authors":"Daniela Constanze Rosenberger, Emilia Mennicken, Iris Schmieg, Terkia Medkour, Marie Pechard, Juliane Sachau, Fabian Fuchtmann, Judy Birch, Kathrin Schnabel, Katy Vincent, Ralf Baron, Didier Bouhassira, Esther Miriam Pogatzki-Zahn","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Endometriosis, a common cause for chronic pelvic pain, significantly affects quality of life, fertility, and overall productivity of those affected. Therapeutic options remain limited, and collating evidence on treatment efficacy is complicated. One reason could be the heterogeneity of assessed outcomes in nonsurgical clinical trials, impeding meaningful result comparisons. This systematic literature review examines outcome domains and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in clinical trials. Through comprehensive search of Embase, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL up until July 2022, we screened 1286 records, of which 191 were included in our analyses. Methodological quality (GRADE criteria), information about publication, patient population, and intervention were assessed, and domains as well as PROMs were extracted and analyzed. In accordance with IMMPACT domain framework, the domain pain was assessed in almost all studies (98.4%), followed by adverse events (73.8%). By contrast, assessment of physical functioning (29.8%), improvement and satisfaction (14.1%), and emotional functioning (6.8%) occurred less frequently. Studies of a better methodological quality tended to use more different domains. Nevertheless, combinations of more than 2 domains were rare, failing to comprehensively capture the bio-psycho-social aspects of endometriosis-associated pain. The PROMs used showed an even broader heterogeneity across all studies. Our findings underscore the large heterogeneity of assessed domains and PROMs in clinical pain-related endometriosis trials. This highlights the urgent need for a standardized approach to both, assessed domains and high-quality PROMs ideally realized through development and implementation of a core outcome set, encompassing the most pivotal domains and PROMs for both, stakeholders and patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":" ","pages":"2419-2444"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11474936/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAIN®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003290","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Endometriosis, a common cause for chronic pelvic pain, significantly affects quality of life, fertility, and overall productivity of those affected. Therapeutic options remain limited, and collating evidence on treatment efficacy is complicated. One reason could be the heterogeneity of assessed outcomes in nonsurgical clinical trials, impeding meaningful result comparisons. This systematic literature review examines outcome domains and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in clinical trials. Through comprehensive search of Embase, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL up until July 2022, we screened 1286 records, of which 191 were included in our analyses. Methodological quality (GRADE criteria), information about publication, patient population, and intervention were assessed, and domains as well as PROMs were extracted and analyzed. In accordance with IMMPACT domain framework, the domain pain was assessed in almost all studies (98.4%), followed by adverse events (73.8%). By contrast, assessment of physical functioning (29.8%), improvement and satisfaction (14.1%), and emotional functioning (6.8%) occurred less frequently. Studies of a better methodological quality tended to use more different domains. Nevertheless, combinations of more than 2 domains were rare, failing to comprehensively capture the bio-psycho-social aspects of endometriosis-associated pain. The PROMs used showed an even broader heterogeneity across all studies. Our findings underscore the large heterogeneity of assessed domains and PROMs in clinical pain-related endometriosis trials. This highlights the urgent need for a standardized approach to both, assessed domains and high-quality PROMs ideally realized through development and implementation of a core outcome set, encompassing the most pivotal domains and PROMs for both, stakeholders and patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于子宫内膜异位症相关慢性疼痛非手术疗效试验中患者报告结果领域和测量方法的系统性文献综述:紧急行动呼吁。
摘要:子宫内膜异位症是慢性盆腔疼痛的常见原因,严重影响患者的生活质量、生育能力和整体生产力。可供选择的治疗方法仍然有限,而且整理治疗效果的证据也很复杂。其中一个原因可能是非手术临床试验中评估结果的异质性,阻碍了有意义的结果比较。本系统性文献综述研究了临床试验中使用的结果域和患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)。通过对截至 2022 年 7 月的 Embase、MEDLINE 和 CENTRAL 进行全面检索,我们筛选了 1286 条记录,其中 191 条被纳入分析。我们对方法学质量(GRADE 标准)、发表信息、患者人群和干预措施进行了评估,并提取和分析了领域和 PROMs。根据 IMMPACT 领域框架,几乎所有研究都对疼痛领域进行了评估(98.4%),其次是不良事件(73.8%)。相比之下,对身体机能(29.8%)、改善和满意度(14.1%)以及情绪机能(6.8%)的评估出现得较少。方法质量较高的研究往往使用更多不同的领域。然而,两个以上领域的组合并不多见,无法全面反映子宫内膜异位症相关疼痛的生物-心理-社会方面。在所有研究中,所使用的 PROMs 显示出更大的异质性。我们的研究结果表明,在与疼痛相关的子宫内膜异位症临床试验中,所评估的领域和 PROMs 存在很大的异质性。这突出表明,迫切需要一种标准化的方法来评估领域和高质量的 PROMs,最好是通过开发和实施一套核心结果,其中包括对利益相关者和患者最重要的领域和 PROMs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PAIN®
PAIN® 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
8.10%
发文量
242
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: PAIN® is the official publication of the International Association for the Study of Pain and publishes original research on the nature,mechanisms and treatment of pain.PAIN® provides a forum for the dissemination of research in the basic and clinical sciences of multidisciplinary interest.
期刊最新文献
Experiencing pain: perspectives of Patrick D. Wall-founding editor of the journal PAIN. The effect of top-down attention on secondary mechanical hyperalgesia: improvements and controversies? The social nature of human pain. Prediction of the response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in peripheral neuropathic pain and validation of a new algorithm. Adolescent predictors of young adult pain and health outcomes: results from a 6-year prospective follow-up study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1