The ethics of artificial intelligence systems in healthcare and medicine: from a local to a global perspective, and back.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1007/s00424-024-02984-3
Tijs Vandemeulebroucke
{"title":"The ethics of artificial intelligence systems in healthcare and medicine: from a local to a global perspective, and back.","authors":"Tijs Vandemeulebroucke","doi":"10.1007/s00424-024-02984-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence systems (ai-systems) (e.g. machine learning, generative artificial intelligence), in healthcare and medicine, have been received with hopes of better care quality, more efficiency, lower care costs, etc. Simultaneously, these systems have been met with reservations regarding their impacts on stakeholders' privacy, on changing power dynamics, on systemic biases, etc. Fortunately, healthcare and medicine have been guided by a multitude of ethical principles, frameworks, or approaches, which also guide the use of ai-systems in healthcare and medicine, in one form or another. Nevertheless, in this article, I argue that most of these approaches are inspired by a local isolationist view on ai-systems, here exemplified by the principlist approach. Despite positive contributions to laying out the ethical landscape of ai-systems in healthcare and medicine, such ethics approaches are too focused on a specific local healthcare and medical setting, be it a particular care relationship, a particular care organisation, or a particular society or region. By doing so, they lose sight of the global impacts ai-systems have, especially environmental impacts and related social impacts, such as increased health risks. To meet this gap, this article presents a global approach to the ethics of ai-systems in healthcare and medicine which consists of five levels of ethical impacts and analysis: individual-relational, organisational, societal, global, and historical. As such, this global approach incorporates the local isolationist view by integrating it in a wider landscape of ethical consideration so to ensure ai-systems meet the needs of everyone everywhere.</p>","PeriodicalId":19954,"journal":{"name":"Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-024-02984-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence systems (ai-systems) (e.g. machine learning, generative artificial intelligence), in healthcare and medicine, have been received with hopes of better care quality, more efficiency, lower care costs, etc. Simultaneously, these systems have been met with reservations regarding their impacts on stakeholders' privacy, on changing power dynamics, on systemic biases, etc. Fortunately, healthcare and medicine have been guided by a multitude of ethical principles, frameworks, or approaches, which also guide the use of ai-systems in healthcare and medicine, in one form or another. Nevertheless, in this article, I argue that most of these approaches are inspired by a local isolationist view on ai-systems, here exemplified by the principlist approach. Despite positive contributions to laying out the ethical landscape of ai-systems in healthcare and medicine, such ethics approaches are too focused on a specific local healthcare and medical setting, be it a particular care relationship, a particular care organisation, or a particular society or region. By doing so, they lose sight of the global impacts ai-systems have, especially environmental impacts and related social impacts, such as increased health risks. To meet this gap, this article presents a global approach to the ethics of ai-systems in healthcare and medicine which consists of five levels of ethical impacts and analysis: individual-relational, organisational, societal, global, and historical. As such, this global approach incorporates the local isolationist view by integrating it in a wider landscape of ethical consideration so to ensure ai-systems meet the needs of everyone everywhere.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能系统在医疗保健领域的伦理问题:从地方视角到全球视角,再到全球视角。
人工智能系统(ai-systems)(如机器学习、生成式人工智能)在医疗保健领域的应用,被寄予了提高医疗质量、提高效率、降低医疗成本等希望。与此同时,人们也对这些系统对利益相关者的隐私、权力动态变化、系统性偏见等的影响持保留意见。值得庆幸的是,医疗保健和医学一直以来都遵循着大量的伦理原则、框架或方法,这些原则、框架或方法也以这样或那样的形式指导着人工智能系统在医疗保健和医学中的应用。然而,在本文中,我认为这些方法中的大多数都受到了关于人工智能系统的局部孤立主义观点的启发,这里以原则主义方法为例。尽管这些伦理学方法在阐述医疗保健和医学中的人工智能系统的伦理前景方面做出了积极贡献,但它们过于关注特定的本地医疗保健和医学环境,无论是特定的医疗保健关系、特定的医疗保健组织,还是特定的社会或地区。这样一来,它们就忽视了人工智能系统对全球的影响,尤其是对环境的影响和相关的社会影响,如增加健康风险。为了弥补这一不足,本文提出了一种全球性的方法来研究医疗保健和医学中的人工智能系统的伦理问题,其中包括五个层面的伦理影响和分析:个人-关系、组织、社会、全球和历史。因此,这种全球性方法将地方孤立主义观点纳入了更广泛的伦理考虑范围,以确保人工智能系统满足世界各地每个人的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
2.20%
发文量
121
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pflügers Archiv European Journal of Physiology publishes those results of original research that are seen as advancing the physiological sciences, especially those providing mechanistic insights into physiological functions at the molecular and cellular level, and clearly conveying a physiological message. Submissions are encouraged that deal with the evaluation of molecular and cellular mechanisms of disease, ideally resulting in translational research. Purely descriptive papers covering applied physiology or clinical papers will be excluded. Papers on methodological topics will be considered if they contribute to the development of novel tools for further investigation of (patho)physiological mechanisms.
期刊最新文献
Obituary for Prof. Stephen (Ben) Walsh, Professor of Nephrology at University College London. The role of non-coding RNAs in neuropathic pain. The emerging roles of necroptosis in skeletal muscle health and disease. Neuroprotective actions of norepinephrine in neurological diseases. BK channels promote action potential repolarization in skeletal muscle but contribute little to myotonia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1