Placental pathology lesions: International Society for Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology vs Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine fetal growth restriction definitions

Abstract

Background

Research on the definition of fetal growth restriction (FGR) has focused on predicting adverse perinatal outcomes. A significant limitation of this approach is that the individual outcomes of interest could be related to the condition and the treatment. Evaluation of outcomes that reflect the pathophysiology of FGR may overcome this limitation.

Objective

To compare the diagnostic performance of the FGR definitions established by the International Society for Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) to predict placental histopathological findings associated with placental insufficiency and a composite adverse neonatal outcome (ANeO).

Study Design

In this retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies, the ISUOG and the SMFM guidelines were used to identify pregnancies with FGR and a corresponding control group. The primary outcome was the prediction of placental histopathological findings associated with placental insufficiency, defined as lesions associated with maternal vascular malperfusion (MVM). A composite ANeO (ie, umbilical artery pH≤7.1, Apgar score at 5 minutes ≤4, neonatal intensive care unit admission, hypoglycemia, respiratory distress syndrome requiring mechanical ventilation, intrapartum fetal distress requiring expedited delivery, and perinatal death) was investigated as a secondary outcome. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and the areas under the receiver-operating-characteristics curves were determined for each FGR definition. Logistic regression models were used to assess the association between each definition and the studied outcomes. A subgroup analysis of the diagnostic performance of both definitions stratifying the population in early and late FGR was also performed.

Results

Both societies’ definitions showed a similar diagnostic performance as well as a significant association with the primary (ISUOG adjusted odds ratio 3.01 [95% confidence interval 2.42, 3.75]; SMFM adjusted odds ratio 2.85 [95% confidence interval 2.31, 3.51]) and secondary outcomes (ISUOG adjusted odds ratio 1.95 [95% confidence interval 1.56, 2.43]; SMFM adjusted odds ratio 2.12 [95% confidence interval 1.70, 2.65]). Furthermore, both FGR definitions had a limited discriminatory capacity for placental histopathological findings of MVM and the composite ANeO (area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve ISUOG 0.63 [95% confidence interval 0.61, 0.65], 0.59 [95% confidence interval 0.56, 0.61]; area under the receiver-operating-characteristics SMFM 0.63 [95% confidence interval 0.61, 0.66], 0.60 [95% confidence interval 0.57, 0.62]).

Conclusion

The ISUOG and the SMFM FGR definitions have limited discriminatory capacity for placental histopathological findings associated with placental insufficiency and a composite ANeO.