Reliable Change Indices and Minimum Detectable Change for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Electroconvulsive Therapy for Depression.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Journal of Ect Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1097/YCT.0000000000001043
Emma Whooley, Gabriele Gusciute, Keeva Kavanagh, Kelly McDonagh, Cathal McCaffrey, Eimear Doody, Ana Jelovac, Declan M McLoughlin
{"title":"Reliable Change Indices and Minimum Detectable Change for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Electroconvulsive Therapy for Depression.","authors":"Emma Whooley, Gabriele Gusciute, Keeva Kavanagh, Kelly McDonagh, Cathal McCaffrey, Eimear Doody, Ana Jelovac, Declan M McLoughlin","doi":"10.1097/YCT.0000000000001043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a commonly used brief cognitive screening tool for monitoring adverse cognitive effects of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). The aim of this study was to examine three statistical methods for detecting reliable change in the MoCA following ECT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective cohort study, 47 patients (mean age 55.2 [SD = 12.8], 59.6% female) with unipolar or bipolar depression treated with an acute course of brief-pulse ECT (72.3% right unilateral) and 47 depressed controls without ECT exposure were tested on the MoCA at baseline and retested at comparable time intervals. ECT patients' performance was also compared to published normative data from a community-based sample of older adults. We calculated proportions of ECT patients remaining stable, declining, and improving following ECT using practice-corrected reliable change index, standardized regression-based formulas, and minimum detectable change cutoff of ±4 MoCA points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using the three methods, 72.3%-78.7% of ECT patients remained stable, 17.0%-23.4% declined, and 4.3% improved in MoCA performance following ECT compared to the two control groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All three methods yield consistent estimates of reliable change in MoCA scores from pre- to post-brief-pulse ECT. The minimum detectable change approach may be the most efficient and accessible method of detecting change due to simplicity of calculation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54844,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ect","volume":" ","pages":"43-48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ect","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000001043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a commonly used brief cognitive screening tool for monitoring adverse cognitive effects of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). The aim of this study was to examine three statistical methods for detecting reliable change in the MoCA following ECT.

Methods: In a prospective cohort study, 47 patients (mean age 55.2 [SD = 12.8], 59.6% female) with unipolar or bipolar depression treated with an acute course of brief-pulse ECT (72.3% right unilateral) and 47 depressed controls without ECT exposure were tested on the MoCA at baseline and retested at comparable time intervals. ECT patients' performance was also compared to published normative data from a community-based sample of older adults. We calculated proportions of ECT patients remaining stable, declining, and improving following ECT using practice-corrected reliable change index, standardized regression-based formulas, and minimum detectable change cutoff of ±4 MoCA points.

Results: Using the three methods, 72.3%-78.7% of ECT patients remained stable, 17.0%-23.4% declined, and 4.3% improved in MoCA performance following ECT compared to the two control groups.

Conclusions: All three methods yield consistent estimates of reliable change in MoCA scores from pre- to post-brief-pulse ECT. The minimum detectable change approach may be the most efficient and accessible method of detecting change due to simplicity of calculation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抑郁症电休克疗法中蒙特利尔认知评估的可靠变化指标和最小可检测变化。
目的:蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)是一种常用的简短认知筛查工具,用于监测电休克疗法(ECT)的不良认知影响。本研究的目的是研究三种统计方法,以检测 ECT 治疗后 MoCA 的可靠变化:在一项前瞻性队列研究中,47 名接受短暂脉冲 ECT(72.3% 右侧单侧)急性疗程治疗的单相或双相抑郁症患者(平均年龄 55.2 [SD = 12.8],59.6% 女性)和 47 名未接受 ECT 治疗的抑郁症对照组患者在基线时接受了 MoCA 测试,并在可比时间间隔内接受了复测。我们还将 ECT 患者的表现与已公布的社区老年人样本常模数据进行了比较。我们使用实践校正可靠变化指数、标准化回归公式和±4个MoCA点的最小可检测变化临界值计算了ECT患者在ECT后保持稳定、下降和改善的比例:与两个对照组相比,使用这三种方法,72.3%-78.7%的ECT患者在ECT后MoCA表现保持稳定,17.0%-23.4%下降,4.3%改善:所有三种方法都能得出从脉冲电疗前到脉冲电疗后MoCA评分可靠变化的一致估计值。由于计算简单,最小可检测变化法可能是检测变化的最有效、最易行的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ect
Journal of Ect 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
154
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of ECT covers all aspects of contemporary electroconvulsive therapy, reporting on major clinical and research developments worldwide. Leading clinicians and researchers examine the effects of induced seizures on behavior and on organ systems; review important research results on the mode of induction, occurrence, and propagation of seizures; and explore the difficult sociological, ethical, and legal issues concerning the use of ECT.
期刊最新文献
Role of Anesthesia in ECT for Major Depressive Disorder. Practical Steps: Using Electroconvulsive Therapy in Patients With Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Catatonia. Electroconvulsive Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Poststroke Depression Following Flow Diversion-Related In-Stent Thrombosis. Variability in Real-World Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) Practice: Is Perfection the Enemy of the Good? Rethinking Seizure Termination: A Possible Paradigm Shift in Understanding a Primary Mechanism of ECT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1