Stroke in critically ill patients with respiratory failure due to COVID-19: Disparities between low-middle and high-income countries

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart & Lung Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2024.06.015
Denise Battaglini MD, PhD , Thu-Lan Kelly PhD , Matthew Griffee MD, PhD , Jonathon Fanning MD, PhD , Lavienraj Premraj Ms , Glenn Whitman MD , Diego Bastos Porto MD, PhD , Rakesh Arora MD, PhD , David Thomson MD, PhD , Paolo Pelosi MD, FERS, FESAIC , Nicole M. White PhD , Gianluigi Li Bassi MD, PhD , Jacky Suen MD, PhD , John F. Fraser MD, PhD , Chiara Robba MD, PhD , Sung-Min Cho DO, MHS
{"title":"Stroke in critically ill patients with respiratory failure due to COVID-19: Disparities between low-middle and high-income countries","authors":"Denise Battaglini MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Thu-Lan Kelly PhD ,&nbsp;Matthew Griffee MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jonathon Fanning MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Lavienraj Premraj Ms ,&nbsp;Glenn Whitman MD ,&nbsp;Diego Bastos Porto MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Rakesh Arora MD, PhD ,&nbsp;David Thomson MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Paolo Pelosi MD, FERS, FESAIC ,&nbsp;Nicole M. White PhD ,&nbsp;Gianluigi Li Bassi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jacky Suen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;John F. Fraser MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Chiara Robba MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Sung-Min Cho DO, MHS","doi":"10.1016/j.hrtlng.2024.06.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>We aimed to compare the incidence of stroke in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) versus high-income countries (HICs) in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and its impact on in-hospital mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>International observational study conducted in 43 countries. Stroke and mortality incidence rates and rate ratios (IRR) were calculated per admitted days using Poisson regression. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to address the HICs vs. LMICs imbalance for confounders.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>23,738 patients [20,511(86.4 %) HICs vs. 3,227(13.6 %) LMICs] were included. The incidence stroke/1000 admitted-days was 35.7 (95 %CI = 28.4–44.9) LMICs and 17.6 (95 %CI = 15.8–19.7) HICs; ischemic 9.47 (95 %CI = 6.57–13.7) LMICs, 1.97 (95 %CI = 1.53, 2.55) HICs; hemorrhagic, 7.18 (95 %CI = 4.73–10.9) LMICs, and 2.52 (95 %CI = 2.00–3.16) HICs; unspecified stroke type 11.6 (95 %CI = 7.75–17.3) LMICs, 8.99 (95 %CI = 7.70–10.5) HICs. In regression with IPW, LMICs vs. HICs had IRR = 1.78 (95 %CI = 1.31–2.42, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Patients from LMICs were more likely to die than those from HICs [43.6% vs 29.2 %; Relative Risk (RR) = 2.59 (95 %CI = 2.29–2.93), <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001)]. Patients with stroke were more likely to die than those without stroke [RR = 1.43 (95 %CI = 1.19–1.72), <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001)].</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Stroke incidence was low in HICs and LMICs although the stroke risk was higher in LMICs. Both LMIC status and stroke increased the risk of death. Improving early diagnosis of stroke and redistribution of healthcare resources should be a priority.</p></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><p>ACTRN12620000421932 registered on 30/03/2020.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55064,"journal":{"name":"Heart & Lung","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart & Lung","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147956324001237","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

We aimed to compare the incidence of stroke in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) versus high-income countries (HICs) in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and its impact on in-hospital mortality.

Methods

International observational study conducted in 43 countries. Stroke and mortality incidence rates and rate ratios (IRR) were calculated per admitted days using Poisson regression. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to address the HICs vs. LMICs imbalance for confounders.

Results

23,738 patients [20,511(86.4 %) HICs vs. 3,227(13.6 %) LMICs] were included. The incidence stroke/1000 admitted-days was 35.7 (95 %CI = 28.4–44.9) LMICs and 17.6 (95 %CI = 15.8–19.7) HICs; ischemic 9.47 (95 %CI = 6.57–13.7) LMICs, 1.97 (95 %CI = 1.53, 2.55) HICs; hemorrhagic, 7.18 (95 %CI = 4.73–10.9) LMICs, and 2.52 (95 %CI = 2.00–3.16) HICs; unspecified stroke type 11.6 (95 %CI = 7.75–17.3) LMICs, 8.99 (95 %CI = 7.70–10.5) HICs. In regression with IPW, LMICs vs. HICs had IRR = 1.78 (95 %CI = 1.31–2.42, p < 0.001). Patients from LMICs were more likely to die than those from HICs [43.6% vs 29.2 %; Relative Risk (RR) = 2.59 (95 %CI = 2.29–2.93), p < 0.001)]. Patients with stroke were more likely to die than those without stroke [RR = 1.43 (95 %CI = 1.19–1.72), p < 0.001)].

Conclusions

Stroke incidence was low in HICs and LMICs although the stroke risk was higher in LMICs. Both LMIC status and stroke increased the risk of death. Improving early diagnosis of stroke and redistribution of healthcare resources should be a priority.

Trial registration

ACTRN12620000421932 registered on 30/03/2020.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19导致呼吸衰竭的重症患者中风:中低收入国家与高收入国家之间的差距。
目的:我们旨在比较中低收入国家(LMICs)与高收入国家(HICs)重症患者 COVID-19 脑卒中的发病率及其对院内死亡率的影响:方法:在 43 个国家开展的国际观察研究。方法:在 43 个国家开展了国际观察研究。采用泊松回归法计算了每住院日的脑卒中和死亡率发病率和发病率比(IRR)。结果:共纳入 23738 例患者[20511 例(86.4%)高收入国家与 3227 例(13.6%)低收入国家]。每千个住院日的中风发病率为:低收入国家 35.7 例(95 %CI = 28.4-44.9 例),高收入国家 17.6 例(95 %CI = 15.8-19.7 例);缺血性 9.47 例(95 %CI = 6.57-13.7 例),低收入国家 1.97 例(95 %CI = 1.53-2.55 例);出血性 1.47 例(95 %CI = 1.57-13.7 例),高收入国家 1.97 例(95 %CI = 1.53-2.55 例)。55)高收入国家;出血性,7.18(95 %CI = 4.73-10.9)低收入国家,2.52(95 %CI = 2.00-3.16)高收入国家;未指定中风类型,11.6(95 %CI = 7.75-17.3)低收入国家,8.99(95 %CI = 7.70-10.5)高收入国家。在 IPW 回归中,低收入国家与高收入国家的 IRR 为 1.78(95 %CI = 1.31-2.42,p < 0.001)。来自低收入与中等收入国家的患者比来自高收入国家的患者更有可能死亡[43.6% vs 29.2%;相对风险 (RR) = 2.59 (95 %CI = 2.29-2.93),p < 0.001]]。中风患者的死亡概率高于非中风患者[RR = 1.43 (95 %CI = 1.19-1.72), p < 0.001]:高收入国家和低收入国家的脑卒中发病率较低,但低收入国家的脑卒中风险较高。低收入国家和中风都会增加死亡风险。改善中风的早期诊断并重新分配医疗资源应成为当务之急:ACTRN12620000421932 注册日期:2020 年 3 月 30 日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heart & Lung
Heart & Lung 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
184
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Heart & Lung: The Journal of Cardiopulmonary and Acute Care, the official publication of The American Association of Heart Failure Nurses, presents original, peer-reviewed articles on techniques, advances, investigations, and observations related to the care of patients with acute and critical illness and patients with chronic cardiac or pulmonary disorders. The Journal''s acute care articles focus on the care of hospitalized patients, including those in the critical and acute care settings. Because most patients who are hospitalized in acute and critical care settings have chronic conditions, we are also interested in the chronically critically ill, the care of patients with chronic cardiopulmonary disorders, their rehabilitation, and disease prevention. The Journal''s heart failure articles focus on all aspects of the care of patients with this condition. Manuscripts that are relevant to populations across the human lifespan are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Long-term outcomes following aortic valve replacement in bioprosthetic vs mechanical valves. Effects of intubation and hypoxemia on intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants during the first week: An observational study. Association between diet-derived antioxidants and asthma: Insights from the NHANES survey 2003-2018 and Mendelian randomization analysis. Effectiveness and safety of emergency transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis complicated by cardiogenic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis The effects of exercise-based prehabilitation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1