Impact of educational interventions for professionals on infection control practices to reduce healthcare-associated infections and prevent infectious diseases: A systematic review

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Collegian Pub Date : 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1016/j.colegn.2024.04.006
Elina Koota , Johanna Kaartinen , Hanna-Leena Melender
{"title":"Impact of educational interventions for professionals on infection control practices to reduce healthcare-associated infections and prevent infectious diseases: A systematic review","authors":"Elina Koota ,&nbsp;Johanna Kaartinen ,&nbsp;Hanna-Leena Melender","doi":"10.1016/j.colegn.2024.04.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Educational interventions can decrease the rates of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). We do not know current evidence on what kind of educational interventions are the most effective to reduce HAIs and infectious diseases. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the impact of educational interventions for health and social care professionals on infection control practices to reduce HAIs and prevent infectious diseases.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched for papers published between January 1, 2006 and November 16, 2021, using the CINAHL, Medic, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised controlled trials and ROBINS-I for quasi-experimental studies. Data were analysed using a deductive content analysis with The Guideline for Reporting Evidence-based Practice Educational interventions and Teaching checklist and The Classification Rubric for Evidence-based Practice Assessment Tools in Education as frameworks.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>The data included 12 studies. Educational interventions on infection control practices have been developed as single, one-time interventions on a local basis. Two studies reported statistically significant outcomes in three of the areas evaluated, which were skills, knowledge, and self-efficacy for the first study, and benefits to the patient, behaviours, and knowledge for the second one. Benefits to the patient were evaluated in seven studies, and out of these, five showed statistically significant improvement.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There is currently no evidence of long-term learning paths or comparisons of different interventions to determine the most effective way to educate healthcare professionals. Statistically significant findings indicate that educational interventions on infection control practices should include both theoretical and practical learning activities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55241,"journal":{"name":"Collegian","volume":"31 4","pages":"Pages 218-231"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769624000283/pdfft?md5=c11a41dbbcc870683b2560377a6575a8&pid=1-s2.0-S1322769624000283-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegian","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769624000283","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Educational interventions can decrease the rates of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). We do not know current evidence on what kind of educational interventions are the most effective to reduce HAIs and infectious diseases. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the impact of educational interventions for health and social care professionals on infection control practices to reduce HAIs and prevent infectious diseases.

Methods

We searched for papers published between January 1, 2006 and November 16, 2021, using the CINAHL, Medic, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised controlled trials and ROBINS-I for quasi-experimental studies. Data were analysed using a deductive content analysis with The Guideline for Reporting Evidence-based Practice Educational interventions and Teaching checklist and The Classification Rubric for Evidence-based Practice Assessment Tools in Education as frameworks.

Findings

The data included 12 studies. Educational interventions on infection control practices have been developed as single, one-time interventions on a local basis. Two studies reported statistically significant outcomes in three of the areas evaluated, which were skills, knowledge, and self-efficacy for the first study, and benefits to the patient, behaviours, and knowledge for the second one. Benefits to the patient were evaluated in seven studies, and out of these, five showed statistically significant improvement.

Conclusions

There is currently no evidence of long-term learning paths or comparisons of different interventions to determine the most effective way to educate healthcare professionals. Statistically significant findings indicate that educational interventions on infection control practices should include both theoretical and practical learning activities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对专业人员的感染控制措施教育干预对减少医护人员相关感染和预防传染病的影响:系统回顾
背景教育干预可以降低医疗相关感染(HAIs)的发生率。目前我们还不知道哪种教育干预措施对减少 HAIs 和传染病最有效。本系统综述旨在研究针对医疗和社会护理专业人员的教育干预措施对感染控制实践的影响,以减少 HAIs 和预防传染病。对随机对照试验采用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具进行质量评估,对准实验研究采用 ROBINS-I 进行质量评估。数据分析采用演绎式内容分析法,以《循证实践教育干预措施报告指南》和《教学检查表》以及《循证实践教育评估工具分类标准》为框架。有关感染控制实践的教育干预措施都是在当地开展的一次性干预措施。有两项研究在三个评估领域取得了有统计学意义的结果,第一项研究的评估领域是技能、知识和自我效能,第二项研究的评估领域是对患者的益处、行为和知识。结论目前还没有证据表明,长期学习路径或不同干预措施的比较可以确定教育医护专业人员的最有效方法。具有统计学意义的研究结果表明,有关感染控制实践的教育干预措施应包括理论和实践学习活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Collegian
Collegian NURSING-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Collegian: The Australian Journal of Nursing Practice, Scholarship and Research is the official journal of Australian College of Nursing (ACN). The journal aims to reflect the broad interests of nurses and the nursing profession, and to challenge nurses on emerging areas of interest. It publishes research articles and scholarly discussion of nursing practice, policy and professional issues. Papers published in the journal are peer reviewed by a double blind process using reviewers who meet high standards of academic and clinical expertise. Invited papers that contribute to nursing knowledge and debate are published at the discretion of the Editor. The journal, online only from 2016, is available to members of ACN and also by separate subscription. ACN believes that each and every nurse in Australia should have the opportunity to grow their career through quality education, and further our profession through representation. ACN is the voice of influence, providing the nursing expertise and experience required when government and key stakeholders are deciding the future of health.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Staff perceptions of the potential for nurses to address service gaps within a homeless health service in Sydney, Australia: Results of a cross-sectional survey Workplace violence against nurses in rural governmental hospitals in Jordan Implementation of evidence-based practice in paediatric nursing care: Facilitators and barriers Weaning small babies from incubator to cot: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1