Using the refractive index of latent fingerprints for the quantification and characterisation of sample deposition

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL Forensic science international Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112124
Caroline Pollard, Kim Wolff
{"title":"Using the refractive index of latent fingerprints for the quantification and characterisation of sample deposition","authors":"Caroline Pollard,&nbsp;Kim Wolff","doi":"10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Latent fingerprints (LFPs) are predominantly used for personal identification, but in recent years research has shown their potential for drug screening. Despite this there is no standardised collection method to allow accurate drug test interpretation. We sought to help address this by characterising different variables related to sweat deposition in LFPs as the knowledge is limited. A series of experiments were conducted firstly to validate a novel tool called the Ridgeway (Intelligent Fingerprint Ltd. UK) to quantify the amount of sweat deposited from a LFP using the refractive index (RI). A significant positive correlation was observed between the Ridgeway score (Rs) and LFP mass [r = 0.868, p &lt; 0.01]. The Rs was used as means to investigate optimal sampling to characterise sample deposition for drug screening purposes. It was found with a consistent disposition pressure (300 – 400 g) and surface (glass slide) no significant difference was observed between the left and right index finger [left: p = 0.938; right: p = 0.838]. Significantly higher Rs [p&lt;0.01] were obtained when 10 cumulative LFPs were deposited compared to a single LFP, suggesting a larger sweat quantity. We also wanted to investigate optimal eccrine sweat sampling to confirm drug ingestion over drug contamination of the fingerprint. We found that wearing gloves did not significantly improve mean difference in Rs when compared to no gloves [p = 0.239]. To produce eccrine only LFPs, external contamination (e.g. sebaceous sweat) needs to be removed. Soap with lint free tissue was significantly better for this compared to antibacterial hand gel [p&lt;0.01]. Our findings showed that the Ridgeway tool effectively quantified LFPs at the point of deposition using a refractive index and enabled us to establish conditions for consistent LFP sampling.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12341,"journal":{"name":"Forensic science international","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073824002056/pdfft?md5=45d549354f662211959bf79a7ccac395&pid=1-s2.0-S0379073824002056-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic science international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073824002056","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Latent fingerprints (LFPs) are predominantly used for personal identification, but in recent years research has shown their potential for drug screening. Despite this there is no standardised collection method to allow accurate drug test interpretation. We sought to help address this by characterising different variables related to sweat deposition in LFPs as the knowledge is limited. A series of experiments were conducted firstly to validate a novel tool called the Ridgeway (Intelligent Fingerprint Ltd. UK) to quantify the amount of sweat deposited from a LFP using the refractive index (RI). A significant positive correlation was observed between the Ridgeway score (Rs) and LFP mass [r = 0.868, p < 0.01]. The Rs was used as means to investigate optimal sampling to characterise sample deposition for drug screening purposes. It was found with a consistent disposition pressure (300 – 400 g) and surface (glass slide) no significant difference was observed between the left and right index finger [left: p = 0.938; right: p = 0.838]. Significantly higher Rs [p<0.01] were obtained when 10 cumulative LFPs were deposited compared to a single LFP, suggesting a larger sweat quantity. We also wanted to investigate optimal eccrine sweat sampling to confirm drug ingestion over drug contamination of the fingerprint. We found that wearing gloves did not significantly improve mean difference in Rs when compared to no gloves [p = 0.239]. To produce eccrine only LFPs, external contamination (e.g. sebaceous sweat) needs to be removed. Soap with lint free tissue was significantly better for this compared to antibacterial hand gel [p<0.01]. Our findings showed that the Ridgeway tool effectively quantified LFPs at the point of deposition using a refractive index and enabled us to establish conditions for consistent LFP sampling.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用潜指纹的折射率对样品沉积进行定量和定性
潜伏指纹(LFP)主要用于个人身份鉴定,但近年来的研究表明,它在毒品筛查方面具有潜力。尽管如此,目前还没有标准化的采集方法来准确解释药物测试。由于知识有限,我们试图通过描述与 LFP 中汗液沉积有关的不同变量来帮助解决这一问题。我们首先进行了一系列实验,以验证一种名为 Ridgeway(英国智能指纹有限公司)的新型工具,该工具利用折射率 (RI) 量化 LFP 的汗液沉积量。在里奇韦评分(Rs)和 LFP 质量之间发现了明显的正相关性[r = 0.868, p < 0.01]。Rs 被用作研究最佳取样的手段,以确定用于药物筛选的样品沉积特征。结果发现,在配置压力(300 - 400 g)和表面(玻璃载玻片)一致的情况下,左手食指和右手食指之间没有观察到显著差异[左:p = 0.938;右:p = 0.838]。与单个 LFP 相比,10 个累积 LFP 的 Rs 明显更高 [p<0.01],这表明出汗量更大。我们还希望研究最理想的肾上腺汗液取样,以确认药物摄入而非指纹的药物污染。我们发现,与不戴手套相比,戴手套并不能显著改善 Rs 的平均差异 [p = 0.239]。要生成仅有肾上腺皮质的 LFP,需要去除外部污染(如皮脂腺汗液)。与抗菌洗手凝胶相比,使用不起毛纸巾的肥皂在这方面的效果明显更好 [p<0.01]。我们的研究结果表明,里奇韦工具能有效地利用折射率对沉积点的 LFP 进行量化,并使我们能够建立一致的 LFP 取样条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forensic science international
Forensic science international 医学-医学:法
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Forensic Science International is the flagship journal in the prestigious Forensic Science International family, publishing the most innovative, cutting-edge, and influential contributions across the forensic sciences. Fields include: forensic pathology and histochemistry, chemistry, biochemistry and toxicology, biology, serology, odontology, psychiatry, anthropology, digital forensics, the physical sciences, firearms, and document examination, as well as investigations of value to public health in its broadest sense, and the important marginal area where science and medicine interact with the law. The journal publishes: Case Reports Commentaries Letters to the Editor Original Research Papers (Regular Papers) Rapid Communications Review Articles Technical Notes.
期刊最新文献
Sensitivity assessment of the modified ABAcard® HemaTrace® and p30 immunochromatographic test cards Degradation and preservation of nitrites in whole blood Post mortem chiral analysis of MDMA and MDA in human blood and hair The 2 stages of cartridge primer toolmark production and the implied impact of cartridge manufacturing tolerances Letter to Editor regarding article “Ok Google, Start a Fire. IoT devices as witnesses and actors in fire investigations”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1