Evaluation of a Support Tool for Diabetes Control in primary care – A Qualitative study with primary care staff

IF 1 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes epidemiology and management Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1016/j.deman.2024.100228
Ricko Damberg Nissen, Jesper Bo Nielsen
{"title":"Evaluation of a Support Tool for Diabetes Control in primary care – A Qualitative study with primary care staff","authors":"Ricko Damberg Nissen,&nbsp;Jesper Bo Nielsen","doi":"10.1016/j.deman.2024.100228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In Denmark, the primary responsibility for treatment of patients with diabetes has shifted from hospitals to primary care. Thus, general practice has assumed responsibility for a complex and multifaceted disease. To address this situation a stratification tool to assist the nurses in primary care in their work with diabetes patients was developed.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>In the present study we evaluated this stratification tool.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The evaluation was based on 18 semi-structured interviews conducted with nurses employed in primary care across Denmark, and who had experience with the stratification tool. The data was subsequently analyzed by content and thematic analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The interviewees were generally positive towards the stratification tool. The analyses established three themes 1. Treatment, 2. Resources, and 3. Points of critique.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study indicates that a combined tool for risk stratification of patients with T2D and for subsequent risk communication is perceived as positive and supportive for quality in care. It is seen to potentially reduce the resources presently allocated to well-regulated and stable T2D patients. These resources will eventually be available for other patients. The positive reception by nurses supports that tools like the Diabetes Control Support Tool could be developed and implemented in general practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72796,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes epidemiology and management","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100228"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666970624000337/pdfft?md5=9c4c5a22cb9a7b99acc7e735767daafd&pid=1-s2.0-S2666970624000337-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes epidemiology and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666970624000337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In Denmark, the primary responsibility for treatment of patients with diabetes has shifted from hospitals to primary care. Thus, general practice has assumed responsibility for a complex and multifaceted disease. To address this situation a stratification tool to assist the nurses in primary care in their work with diabetes patients was developed.

Aim

In the present study we evaluated this stratification tool.

Method

The evaluation was based on 18 semi-structured interviews conducted with nurses employed in primary care across Denmark, and who had experience with the stratification tool. The data was subsequently analyzed by content and thematic analyses.

Results

The interviewees were generally positive towards the stratification tool. The analyses established three themes 1. Treatment, 2. Resources, and 3. Points of critique.

Conclusions

Our study indicates that a combined tool for risk stratification of patients with T2D and for subsequent risk communication is perceived as positive and supportive for quality in care. It is seen to potentially reduce the resources presently allocated to well-regulated and stable T2D patients. These resources will eventually be available for other patients. The positive reception by nurses supports that tools like the Diabetes Control Support Tool could be developed and implemented in general practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估基层医疗机构糖尿病控制支持工具--与基层医疗机构工作人员共同开展的定性研究
背景在丹麦,治疗糖尿病患者的主要责任已从医院转移到基层医疗机构。因此,全科医生承担起了治疗这种复杂、多方面疾病的责任。本研究对这一分层工具进行了评估。评估基于 18 个半结构式访谈,访谈对象是丹麦各地基层医疗机构的护士,他们都有使用分层工具的经验。结果受访者普遍对分层工具持肯定态度。分析确定了三个主题:1.待遇,2. 资源,3.结论我们的研究表明,对 T2D 患者进行风险分层和后续风险交流的综合工具被认为是积极的,有助于提高护理质量。它有可能减少目前分配给病情稳定的 T2D 患者的资源。这些资源最终将用于其他患者。护士们对该工具的积极评价表明,类似 "糖尿病控制支持工具 "这样的工具可以在全科实践中开发和使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes epidemiology and management
Diabetes epidemiology and management Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 days
期刊最新文献
Innovative immunotherapies and emerging treatments in type 1 diabetes management Autoantibodies in type 1 diabetes: Prevalence and clinical profiles Reply to increase in diabetic deaths during COVID-19 pandemic. Some comments High prevalence of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes, and identification of associated factors, in high-risk adults in Vietnam: A cross-sectional study editorial board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1