Risk factors of a positive resection margin in locoregional appendix cancer and its impact on survival: The national cancer database analysis

Surgical Oncology Insight Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1016/j.soi.2024.100072
Ekaterina Baron, Chih Ching Wu, Andrei Nikiforchin, Raquel Abengozar Mingorance, Stephanie C. Carr, Jessica A. Wernberg, Rohit Sharma
{"title":"Risk factors of a positive resection margin in locoregional appendix cancer and its impact on survival: The national cancer database analysis","authors":"Ekaterina Baron,&nbsp;Chih Ching Wu,&nbsp;Andrei Nikiforchin,&nbsp;Raquel Abengozar Mingorance,&nbsp;Stephanie C. Carr,&nbsp;Jessica A. Wernberg,&nbsp;Rohit Sharma","doi":"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The impact of a positive resection margin (RM+) in appendiceal cancer (AC) remains unclear, with small studies suggesting it does not worsen survival in low-grade subtypes. We aimed to evaluate RM+ rates, its risk factors, and survival outcomes across different AC histologies.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database (2004–2019) and including stage I-III AC cases. Surgical and survival outcomes were compared between RM+ and RM- groups, with logistic regression analyzing the association of RM+ and its predictors. Subgroup analysis was performed for low/high tumor grade (LG/HG), mucinous/non-mucinous pathology (MAC/NMAC), and signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 6800 patients identified, 737 (10.8 %) had RM+, while 6063 (89.2 %) had RM-. RM+ rates varied across AC histologies: 10.9 % in LG-MAC, 17.0 % in HG-MAC, 7.8 % in LG-NMAC, 13.9 % in HG-NMAC, and 17.9 % in SRC. RM+ correlated with significantly worse survival in LG-MAC (HR 1.67), HG-MAC (HR 1.83), LG-NMAC (HR 2.04), and SRC (HR 2.37) but not in HG-NMAC after adjusting to other factors. Predictors of RM+ included pT stage, preoperative chemotherapy in LG tumors and pT stage and positive lymph nodes in HG tumors whereas more extensive resection was associated with RM- in both LG and HG.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>RM+ worsens survival in most AC subtypes, highlighting the importance of achieving negative margins. Extensive resection, like right hemicolectomy, can improve RM- rate, but factors such as pT stage, lymph node status, and preoperative chemotherapy also affect RM+. Surgeons should prioritize achieving RM- in all AC histologies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101191,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology Insight","volume":"1 3","pages":"Article 100072"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950247024000811/pdfft?md5=bea5968875967fb0b29097f4858ba440&pid=1-s2.0-S2950247024000811-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Oncology Insight","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950247024000811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The impact of a positive resection margin (RM+) in appendiceal cancer (AC) remains unclear, with small studies suggesting it does not worsen survival in low-grade subtypes. We aimed to evaluate RM+ rates, its risk factors, and survival outcomes across different AC histologies.

Methods

We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database (2004–2019) and including stage I-III AC cases. Surgical and survival outcomes were compared between RM+ and RM- groups, with logistic regression analyzing the association of RM+ and its predictors. Subgroup analysis was performed for low/high tumor grade (LG/HG), mucinous/non-mucinous pathology (MAC/NMAC), and signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC).

Results

Among 6800 patients identified, 737 (10.8 %) had RM+, while 6063 (89.2 %) had RM-. RM+ rates varied across AC histologies: 10.9 % in LG-MAC, 17.0 % in HG-MAC, 7.8 % in LG-NMAC, 13.9 % in HG-NMAC, and 17.9 % in SRC. RM+ correlated with significantly worse survival in LG-MAC (HR 1.67), HG-MAC (HR 1.83), LG-NMAC (HR 2.04), and SRC (HR 2.37) but not in HG-NMAC after adjusting to other factors. Predictors of RM+ included pT stage, preoperative chemotherapy in LG tumors and pT stage and positive lymph nodes in HG tumors whereas more extensive resection was associated with RM- in both LG and HG.

Conclusion

RM+ worsens survival in most AC subtypes, highlighting the importance of achieving negative margins. Extensive resection, like right hemicolectomy, can improve RM- rate, but factors such as pT stage, lymph node status, and preoperative chemotherapy also affect RM+. Surgeons should prioritize achieving RM- in all AC histologies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部阑尾癌切除边缘阳性的风险因素及其对生存的影响:国家癌症数据库分析
导言切除边缘阳性(RM+)对阑尾癌(AC)的影响仍不明确,一些小型研究表明它不会恶化低级别亚型的生存率。我们利用全国癌症数据库(2004-2019 年)开展了一项多中心回顾性队列研究,其中包括 I-III 期阑尾癌病例。比较了RM+组和RM-组的手术和生存结果,并通过逻辑回归分析了RM+与其预测因素的关联。对低/高肿瘤分级(LG/HG)、粘液性/非粘液性病理(MAC/NMAC)和标志环细胞癌(SRC)进行了亚组分析。结果在6800例已确定的患者中,737例(10.8%)为RM+,6063例(89.2%)为RM-。不同组织学的 AC RM+ 率各不相同:LG-MAC为10.9%,HG-MAC为17.0%,LG-NMAC为7.8%,HG-NMAC为13.9%,SRC为17.9%。在 LG-MAC(HR 1.67)、HG-MAC(HR 1.83)、LG-NMAC(HR 2.04)和 SRC(HR 2.37)中,RM+ 与明显较差的存活率相关,但在调整其他因素后,在 HG-NMAC 中则不相关。RM+的预测因素包括LG肿瘤的pT分期和术前化疗,以及HG肿瘤的pT分期和淋巴结阳性,而在LG和HG中,更广泛的切除与RM-有关。广泛切除(如右半结肠切除术)可提高RM-率,但pT分期、淋巴结状态和术前化疗等因素也会影响RM+。外科医生应优先考虑在所有 AC 组织学中实现 RM-。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A review and update of nipple sparing mastectomy with technical considerations Tumor hilar proximity may be predictive of recurrence, survival, stage, and grade in patients with renal cell carcinoma Disparities in outcomes and costs of gastrectomy for gastric cancer among patients with depression and anxiety Incidence and timing of recurrence after adjuvant Palbociclib in completely resected retroperitoneal liposarcoma Validation of nomograms predicting survival in patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC for peritoneal dissemination of mucinous appendiceal cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1