Making a case for playful assessment as asset-based assessment through conjecture mapping

IF 4.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Learning and Instruction Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101971
Yoon Jeon Kim, Kailea Saplan
{"title":"Making a case for playful assessment as asset-based assessment through conjecture mapping","authors":"Yoon Jeon Kim,&nbsp;Kailea Saplan","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The paper proposes a theoretical design framework for playful assessment, emphasizing learner agency, engagement, and creativity. It argues that assessment should be a continuous, inclusive, transparent, and collaborative process, aligned with principles of equitable learning. The framework introduces “The Four Freedoms of Play” as heuristics for playful assessment, emphasizing aspects like the freedom to experiment, the freedom to fail, the freedom to try on identities, and the freedom of effort. These freedoms align with current educational research findings and the importance of learners' agency, identity safety, and sense of belonging. In summary, playful stances in assessment can expand what assessment is by creating flexible and creative assessment opportunities that center learners’ agency and identity, ultimately leading to an asset-based learning culture.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 101971"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000987","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper proposes a theoretical design framework for playful assessment, emphasizing learner agency, engagement, and creativity. It argues that assessment should be a continuous, inclusive, transparent, and collaborative process, aligned with principles of equitable learning. The framework introduces “The Four Freedoms of Play” as heuristics for playful assessment, emphasizing aspects like the freedom to experiment, the freedom to fail, the freedom to try on identities, and the freedom of effort. These freedoms align with current educational research findings and the importance of learners' agency, identity safety, and sense of belonging. In summary, playful stances in assessment can expand what assessment is by creating flexible and creative assessment opportunities that center learners’ agency and identity, ultimately leading to an asset-based learning culture.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过猜想制图为基于资产的游戏性评估提供依据
本文提出了游戏性评价的理论设计框架,强调学习者的能动性、参与性和创造性。它认为,评估应该是一个持续的、包容的、透明的和协作的过程,与公平学习的原则相一致。该框架引入了 "游戏的四大自由 "作为游戏性评价的启发式方法,强调实验的自由、失败的自由、尝试身份的自由和努力的自由。这些自由与当前的教育研究成果以及学习者的能动性、身份安全和归属感的重要性相一致。总之,在评估中采取游戏的姿态,可以通过创造灵活的、创造性的评估机会,以学习者的能动性和身份为中心,拓展评估的内涵,最终形成一种以资产为基础的学习文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.
期刊最新文献
Competitive and non-competitive school climate and students’ well-being Comparison effects on self- and external ratings: Testing the generalizability of the 2I/E model to parents and teachers of academic track school students Testing the CONIC model: The interplay of conscientiousness and interest in predicting academic effort Metacognitive scaffolding for digital reading and mind-wandering in adults with and without ADHD Retrieval supports word learning in children with Down syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1