Modelling level 1 situation awareness in driving: A cognitive architecture approach

IF 7.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1016/j.trc.2024.104737
Umair Rehman , Shi Cao , Carolyn G. MacGregor
{"title":"Modelling level 1 situation awareness in driving: A cognitive architecture approach","authors":"Umair Rehman ,&nbsp;Shi Cao ,&nbsp;Carolyn G. MacGregor","doi":"10.1016/j.trc.2024.104737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The goal of this research is to computationally model and simulate the situation awareness (SA) of drivers. A computational model in a cognitive architecture was developed that can interact with a driving simulator to infer quantitative predictions of drivers’ SA. The model uses the Queueing Network Adaptive Control of Thought-Rational (QN-ACTR) framework as a foundation and integrates a dynamic visual sampling model (SEEV) to create QN-ACTR-SA, which simulates attention allocation patterns of human drivers at SA Level 1 (i.e., perception of critical elements). QN-ACTR-SA also incorporates a driver model that can interact with a driving simulator. A validation study was conducted to determine whether Level 1 SA results produced with the QN-ACTR-SA model correspond to empirical data collected from human drivers (14 participants) for the same tasks. Both QN-ACTR-SA and human participants were probed for SA using two approaches: within-task queries using the Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique (SAGAT) and post-experiment questions. A comparative assessment demonstrated that QN-ACTR-SA could reasonably simulate drivers’ Level 1 SA for two driving conditions: easy (with few vehicles and signboards) and complex (with dense traffic and signboards). QN-ACTR-SA fit for human SAGAT scores (possible range 0–100) resulted in a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 5.0% and the root means square error (RMSE) of 3.5. Model fit for post-experiment human SA results was MAPE of 6.7% and RMSE of 6.1. Limitations of QN-ACTR-SA as a predictive model and areas of future research are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54417,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968090X24002584","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The goal of this research is to computationally model and simulate the situation awareness (SA) of drivers. A computational model in a cognitive architecture was developed that can interact with a driving simulator to infer quantitative predictions of drivers’ SA. The model uses the Queueing Network Adaptive Control of Thought-Rational (QN-ACTR) framework as a foundation and integrates a dynamic visual sampling model (SEEV) to create QN-ACTR-SA, which simulates attention allocation patterns of human drivers at SA Level 1 (i.e., perception of critical elements). QN-ACTR-SA also incorporates a driver model that can interact with a driving simulator. A validation study was conducted to determine whether Level 1 SA results produced with the QN-ACTR-SA model correspond to empirical data collected from human drivers (14 participants) for the same tasks. Both QN-ACTR-SA and human participants were probed for SA using two approaches: within-task queries using the Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique (SAGAT) and post-experiment questions. A comparative assessment demonstrated that QN-ACTR-SA could reasonably simulate drivers’ Level 1 SA for two driving conditions: easy (with few vehicles and signboards) and complex (with dense traffic and signboards). QN-ACTR-SA fit for human SAGAT scores (possible range 0–100) resulted in a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 5.0% and the root means square error (RMSE) of 3.5. Model fit for post-experiment human SA results was MAPE of 6.7% and RMSE of 6.1. Limitations of QN-ACTR-SA as a predictive model and areas of future research are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模拟驾驶中的 1 级情境意识:认知结构方法
本研究的目标是对驾驶员的情境意识(SA)进行计算建模和模拟。研究人员开发了一个认知架构的计算模型,该模型可与驾驶模拟器进行交互,从而对驾驶员的态势感知进行定量预测。该模型以队列网络自适应理性思维控制(QN-ACTR)框架为基础,并集成了动态视觉采样模型(SEEV),从而创建了 QN-ACTR-SA,该模型模拟了处于 SA 1 级(即感知关键要素)的人类驾驶员的注意力分配模式。QN-ACTR-SA 还包含一个可与驾驶模拟器互动的驾驶员模型。我们进行了一项验证研究,以确定 QN-ACTR-SA 模型产生的 1 级 SA 结果是否与从人类驾驶员(14 名参与者)处收集的相同任务的经验数据相符。QN-ACTR-SA 和人类参与者都使用两种方法对 SA 进行了测试:使用态势感知整体评估技术 (SAGAT) 进行任务内查询和实验后提问。对比评估结果表明,QN-ACTR-SA 可以合理地模拟驾驶员在两种驾驶条件下的 1 级 SA:简单(车辆少、有标志牌)和复杂(交通密集、有标志牌)。QN-ACTR-SA 对人类 SAGAT 分数(可能范围 0-100)的拟合结果是,平均绝对百分比误差 (MAPE) 为 5.0%,均方根误差 (RMSE) 为 3.5。实验后人类 SA 结果的模型拟合 MAPE 为 6.7%,RMSE 为 6.1。讨论了 QN-ACTR-SA 作为预测模型的局限性和未来研究领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
12.00%
发文量
332
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part C (TR_C) is dedicated to showcasing high-quality, scholarly research that delves into the development, applications, and implications of transportation systems and emerging technologies. Our focus lies not solely on individual technologies, but rather on their broader implications for the planning, design, operation, control, maintenance, and rehabilitation of transportation systems, services, and components. In essence, the intellectual core of the journal revolves around the transportation aspect rather than the technology itself. We actively encourage the integration of quantitative methods from diverse fields such as operations research, control systems, complex networks, computer science, and artificial intelligence. Join us in exploring the intersection of transportation systems and emerging technologies to drive innovation and progress in the field.
期刊最新文献
An environmentally-aware dynamic planning of electric vehicles for aircraft towing considering stochastic aircraft arrival and departure times Network-wide speed–flow estimation considering uncertain traffic conditions and sparse multi-type detectors: A KL divergence-based optimization approach Revealing the impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on intercity truck transport: New insights from big data analytics MATNEC: AIS data-driven environment-adaptive maritime traffic network construction for realistic route generation A qualitative AI security risk assessment of autonomous vehicles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1