Navigating the non-compliance effects on system optimal route guidance using reinforcement learning

IF 7.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1016/j.trc.2024.104721
Hyunsoo Yun , Eui-jin Kim , Seung Woo Ham , Dong-Kyu Kim
{"title":"Navigating the non-compliance effects on system optimal route guidance using reinforcement learning","authors":"Hyunsoo Yun ,&nbsp;Eui-jin Kim ,&nbsp;Seung Woo Ham ,&nbsp;Dong-Kyu Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.trc.2024.104721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We consider a scenario where the transportation management center (TMC) guides future autonomous vehicles (AVs) toward optimal routes, aiming to bring the network in line with the system optimal (SO) principle. However, achieving this requires a joint decision-making process, while users may be non-compliant with the TMC’s route guidance for personal gain. This paper models a future transportation network with a microscopic simulation, to introduce a novel concept of mixed equilibrium. In this framework, AVs follow the TMC’s SO route guidance, while users can dynamically choose to either comply or manually override this autonomy based on their own judgment. We initially model a fully compliant scenario, where the centralized Q-network, analogous to a TMC, is trained using reinforcement learning (RL) to minimize total system travel time (TSTT), providing optimal routes to users. Subsequently, we extend the problem setting to a multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) scenario, where users can comply or deviate from the TMC’s guidance based on their own decision-making. Through neural fictitious self-play (NFSP), we employ a modulating hyperparameter to investigate the impact of varying degrees of non-compliance on the overall system. Results indicate that our RL approach holds significant potential for addressing the dynamic system optimal assignment problem. Remarkably, the TMC’s route guidance retains the essence of SO while integrating some level of non-compliance. However, we also demonstrate that dominant user-centric decision-making may lead to system inefficiencies while creating disparities among users. Our framework serves as an innovative tool in an AV-dominant future, offering a realistic perspective on network performance that aids in formulating effective traffic management strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54417,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968090X24002420/pdfft?md5=9dc535009d27953f74f5e574dc779a57&pid=1-s2.0-S0968090X24002420-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968090X24002420","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We consider a scenario where the transportation management center (TMC) guides future autonomous vehicles (AVs) toward optimal routes, aiming to bring the network in line with the system optimal (SO) principle. However, achieving this requires a joint decision-making process, while users may be non-compliant with the TMC’s route guidance for personal gain. This paper models a future transportation network with a microscopic simulation, to introduce a novel concept of mixed equilibrium. In this framework, AVs follow the TMC’s SO route guidance, while users can dynamically choose to either comply or manually override this autonomy based on their own judgment. We initially model a fully compliant scenario, where the centralized Q-network, analogous to a TMC, is trained using reinforcement learning (RL) to minimize total system travel time (TSTT), providing optimal routes to users. Subsequently, we extend the problem setting to a multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) scenario, where users can comply or deviate from the TMC’s guidance based on their own decision-making. Through neural fictitious self-play (NFSP), we employ a modulating hyperparameter to investigate the impact of varying degrees of non-compliance on the overall system. Results indicate that our RL approach holds significant potential for addressing the dynamic system optimal assignment problem. Remarkably, the TMC’s route guidance retains the essence of SO while integrating some level of non-compliance. However, we also demonstrate that dominant user-centric decision-making may lead to system inefficiencies while creating disparities among users. Our framework serves as an innovative tool in an AV-dominant future, offering a realistic perspective on network performance that aids in formulating effective traffic management strategies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用强化学习解决不合规对系统最优路线引导的影响问题
我们考虑的情景是,交通管理中心(TMC)引导未来的自动驾驶汽车(AV)驶向最优路线,目的是使网络符合系统最优(SO)原则。然而,实现这一目标需要一个共同决策过程,而用户可能会为了个人利益而不遵守交通管理中心的路线指引。本文通过微观模拟对未来交通网络进行建模,引入了混合平衡的新概念。在这一框架中,自动驾驶汽车遵循 TMC 的 SO 路线指引,而用户则可以根据自己的判断动态选择遵守或手动推翻这一自主权。我们最初模拟了一个完全服从的场景,在这个场景中,集中式 Q 网络(类似于 TMC)通过强化学习(RL)进行训练,以最小化系统总行驶时间(TSTT),为用户提供最优路线。随后,我们将问题设置扩展到多代理强化学习(MARL)场景,用户可以根据自己的决策遵守或偏离 TMC 的指导。通过神经虚构自我游戏(NFSP),我们采用了一个调节超参数来研究不同程度的不遵守行为对整个系统的影响。结果表明,我们的 RL 方法在解决动态系统优化分配问题方面具有巨大潜力。值得注意的是,TMC 的路线指引保留了 SO 的精髓,同时也融入了一定程度的不遵守行为。不过,我们也证明,以用户为中心的主导决策可能会导致系统效率低下,同时造成用户之间的差异。我们的框架是未来以视听设备为主导的创新工具,为网络性能提供了一个现实的视角,有助于制定有效的交通管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
12.00%
发文量
332
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part C (TR_C) is dedicated to showcasing high-quality, scholarly research that delves into the development, applications, and implications of transportation systems and emerging technologies. Our focus lies not solely on individual technologies, but rather on their broader implications for the planning, design, operation, control, maintenance, and rehabilitation of transportation systems, services, and components. In essence, the intellectual core of the journal revolves around the transportation aspect rather than the technology itself. We actively encourage the integration of quantitative methods from diverse fields such as operations research, control systems, complex networks, computer science, and artificial intelligence. Join us in exploring the intersection of transportation systems and emerging technologies to drive innovation and progress in the field.
期刊最新文献
A User-Driven Prioritisation Process implementation and optimisation for ATFM hotspot resolution Scenario-level knowledge transfer for motion planning of autonomous driving via successor representation Pricing for multi-modal pickup and delivery problems with heterogeneous users LFF: An attention allocation-based following behavior framework in lane-free environments T3C: A traffic-communication coupling control approach for autonomous intersection management system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1