{"title":"Practices and politics of energy efficiency among householders in a low-energy building in Sweden","authors":"Hilda Wenander","doi":"10.1016/j.eist.2024.100876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The social practices of householders are crucial for the realisation of energy policies, but their political aspects have been overlooked in previous research. The aim of this paper is to deepen the understanding of the possibilities of householders for political participation in energy transitions in the home. By analysing the social practices of householders in a low-energy building, the paper demonstrates that engagement in energy efficiency is hindered by the materiality and a lack of knowledge of - as well as reliability on - the building's energy system. Yet, the householders consider their lack of knowledge as individual responsibilities. While the necessity to form a political agenda stems from the unmet needs for thermal comfort in the individual home, the political agency to change the lack of influence is developed in the collectivity between the householders. The contestation of individual responsibilities brings forward a politicisation and democratisation of the energy transition. The results of this paper thus support the acknowledgement of different forms of political participation in energy transitions to shape future democratic and just energy systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54294,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions","volume":"52 ","pages":"Article 100876"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210422424000662/pdfft?md5=a57eedbc41ffc60725a547ab4e739855&pid=1-s2.0-S2210422424000662-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210422424000662","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The social practices of householders are crucial for the realisation of energy policies, but their political aspects have been overlooked in previous research. The aim of this paper is to deepen the understanding of the possibilities of householders for political participation in energy transitions in the home. By analysing the social practices of householders in a low-energy building, the paper demonstrates that engagement in energy efficiency is hindered by the materiality and a lack of knowledge of - as well as reliability on - the building's energy system. Yet, the householders consider their lack of knowledge as individual responsibilities. While the necessity to form a political agenda stems from the unmet needs for thermal comfort in the individual home, the political agency to change the lack of influence is developed in the collectivity between the householders. The contestation of individual responsibilities brings forward a politicisation and democratisation of the energy transition. The results of this paper thus support the acknowledgement of different forms of political participation in energy transitions to shape future democratic and just energy systems.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions serves as a platform for reporting studies on innovations and socio-economic transitions aimed at fostering an environmentally sustainable economy, thereby addressing structural resource scarcity and environmental challenges, particularly those associated with fossil energy use and climate change. The journal focuses on various forms of innovation, including technological, organizational, economic, institutional, and political, as well as economy-wide and sectoral changes in areas such as energy, transport, agriculture, and water management. It endeavors to tackle complex questions concerning social, economic, behavioral-psychological, and political barriers and opportunities, along with their intricate interactions. With a multidisciplinary approach and methodological openness, the journal welcomes contributions from a wide array of disciplines within the social, environmental, and innovation sciences.