A systematic review of the role of terrestrial vertebrates in ecological integrity assessment

IF 5.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Pub Date : 2024-06-20 DOI:10.1016/j.indic.2024.100426
Karen Lorena Velásquez-C , Octavio Pérez-Maqueo , Roger Guevara , Luis D. Verde Arregoitia , Mariana Munguía-Carrara
{"title":"A systematic review of the role of terrestrial vertebrates in ecological integrity assessment","authors":"Karen Lorena Velásquez-C ,&nbsp;Octavio Pérez-Maqueo ,&nbsp;Roger Guevara ,&nbsp;Luis D. Verde Arregoitia ,&nbsp;Mariana Munguía-Carrara","doi":"10.1016/j.indic.2024.100426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Natural systems face human pressures, demanding urgently Ecological Integrity (EI) assessments. EI assessments identify the state of an ecosystem through biotic and abiotic indicators. Fauna is a key element in the functioning of ecosystems, and therefore, their inclusion in the indicator stock may enhance EI evaluations. We conducted a systematic literature review to evaluate the use of terrestrial vertebrate-derived information as indicators of EI. Fifty-eight publications used information on terrestrial vertebrates as EI. Birds (39) were the group most frequently used as an indicator, followed by mammals (16), amphibians (5), and reptiles (3). Species composition was the most frequently evaluated element of EI, and community metrics such as richness, diversity, indicator species, and abundance stand out as the most frequently used for evaluating the relation of the EI to a terrestrial vertebrate group. The Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) and indices derived from it were the most frequently used to identify the state of integrity of an ecosystem using vertebrates. Few studies have developed a conceptual model that explains the causal relationship between EI and metrics associated with terrestrial vertebrates. EI assessments are a valuable tool for identifying the state of a system. However, it is necessary to complement them with faunal indicators that include various taxonomic groups. The inclusion of more than one taxonomic group would allow for the identification of changes at different levels and generate biological hypotheses of relationships between measurable variables at the faunal level and their incorporation into IE analysis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36171,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972724000941/pdfft?md5=ceea6a2c0a63abedb1bf6e651bff9e0f&pid=1-s2.0-S2665972724000941-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972724000941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Natural systems face human pressures, demanding urgently Ecological Integrity (EI) assessments. EI assessments identify the state of an ecosystem through biotic and abiotic indicators. Fauna is a key element in the functioning of ecosystems, and therefore, their inclusion in the indicator stock may enhance EI evaluations. We conducted a systematic literature review to evaluate the use of terrestrial vertebrate-derived information as indicators of EI. Fifty-eight publications used information on terrestrial vertebrates as EI. Birds (39) were the group most frequently used as an indicator, followed by mammals (16), amphibians (5), and reptiles (3). Species composition was the most frequently evaluated element of EI, and community metrics such as richness, diversity, indicator species, and abundance stand out as the most frequently used for evaluating the relation of the EI to a terrestrial vertebrate group. The Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) and indices derived from it were the most frequently used to identify the state of integrity of an ecosystem using vertebrates. Few studies have developed a conceptual model that explains the causal relationship between EI and metrics associated with terrestrial vertebrates. EI assessments are a valuable tool for identifying the state of a system. However, it is necessary to complement them with faunal indicators that include various taxonomic groups. The inclusion of more than one taxonomic group would allow for the identification of changes at different levels and generate biological hypotheses of relationships between measurable variables at the faunal level and their incorporation into IE analysis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
陆生脊椎动物在生态完整性评估中的作用系统回顾
自然系统面临着人类的压力,迫切需要进行生态完整性(EI)评估。生态完整性评估通过生物和非生物指标来确定生态系统的状态。动物是生态系统运作的关键因素,因此,将它们纳入指标种群可加强生态完整性评估。我们进行了一次系统的文献综述,以评估陆生脊椎动物衍生信息作为生态影响指标的使用情况。有 58 篇文献使用陆生脊椎动物的信息作为生态影响指标。鸟类(39 种)是最常用的指标,其次是哺乳动物(16 种)、两栖动物(5 种)和爬行动物(3 种)。物种组成是最常被评估的生态完整性要素,而群落指标,如丰富度、多样性、指示物种和丰度,则是最常被用于评估生态完整性与陆生脊椎动物群关系的指标。生物完整性指数(IBI)及其衍生指数最常用于利用脊椎动物确定生态系统的完整性状态。很少有研究建立了一个概念模型来解释 EI 与陆生脊椎动物相关指标之间的因果关系。EI 评估是确定系统状态的重要工具。然而,有必要使用包括不同分类群的动物指标对其进行补充。纳入一个以上的分类群组可识别不同层面的变化,并就动物层面可测量变量之间的关系提出生物假设,并将其纳入生态影响指数分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
57 days
期刊最新文献
Decoding the mystery of Bangladesh's jute decline: A climate crisis or plastic predicament Perceived accessibility matters: Unveiling key urban parameters through traditional and technology-driven participation methods Water provision benefits from karst ecosystems: An example for Watuputih groundwater basin, North Kendeng Mountain, Indonesia Towards net-zero carbon emissions: A systematic review of carbon sustainability reporting based on GHG protocol framework Ecosystem services driving factors and ecological conservation pattern construction, Qinghai-Tibet Plateau
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1