Sucharat Limpanopparat, Erin Gibson, Dr Andrew Harris
{"title":"User engagement, attitudes, and the effectiveness of chatbots as a mental health intervention: A systematic review","authors":"Sucharat Limpanopparat, Erin Gibson, Dr Andrew Harris","doi":"10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In recent years, chatbots developed for mental health intervention purposes have been widely implemented to solve the challenges of workforce shortage and accessibility issues faced by traditional health services. Nevertheless, research assessing the technologies’ potential and risks remains sporadic.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This review aims to synthesise the existing research on engagement, user attitude, and effectiveness of psychological chatbot interventions.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A systematic review was conducted using relevant peer-reviewed literature since 2010. These studies were derived from six databases: PubMed<em>, PsycINFO</em>, <em>Web of</em> <em>Science</em>, <em>Science Direct, Scopus</em> and <em>IEEE Xplore</em>.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Engagement level with chatbots that complied with digital intervention standards, lead to positive mental health outcomes. Although users had some uncertainties about the usability of these tools, positive attitudes towards chatbots regarding user experience and acceptability were frequently identified due to the chatbots' psychological capabilities and unique functions. High levels of outcome efficacy were found for those with depression. The differences in demographics, psychological approaches, and featured technologies could also influence the extent of mental health chatbot performances.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p><em>P</em>ositive attitudes and engagement with chatbots, as well as positive mental health outcomes, shows chatbot technology is a promising modality for mental health intervention. However, implementing them amongst some demographics or with novel features should be carefully considered. Further research using mainstream mental health chatbots and evaluating them simultaneously with standardised measures of engagement, user attitude, and effectiveness is necessary for intervention development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100324,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","volume":"2 2","pages":"Article 100081"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000410/pdfft?md5=28fa4639b941c7cab725c225999b1bd0&pid=1-s2.0-S2949882124000410-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
In recent years, chatbots developed for mental health intervention purposes have been widely implemented to solve the challenges of workforce shortage and accessibility issues faced by traditional health services. Nevertheless, research assessing the technologies’ potential and risks remains sporadic.
Purpose
This review aims to synthesise the existing research on engagement, user attitude, and effectiveness of psychological chatbot interventions.
Method
A systematic review was conducted using relevant peer-reviewed literature since 2010. These studies were derived from six databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, Web ofScience, Science Direct, Scopus and IEEE Xplore.
Results
Engagement level with chatbots that complied with digital intervention standards, lead to positive mental health outcomes. Although users had some uncertainties about the usability of these tools, positive attitudes towards chatbots regarding user experience and acceptability were frequently identified due to the chatbots' psychological capabilities and unique functions. High levels of outcome efficacy were found for those with depression. The differences in demographics, psychological approaches, and featured technologies could also influence the extent of mental health chatbot performances.
Conclusion
Positive attitudes and engagement with chatbots, as well as positive mental health outcomes, shows chatbot technology is a promising modality for mental health intervention. However, implementing them amongst some demographics or with novel features should be carefully considered. Further research using mainstream mental health chatbots and evaluating them simultaneously with standardised measures of engagement, user attitude, and effectiveness is necessary for intervention development.
背景近年来,以心理健康干预为目的开发的聊天机器人得到广泛应用,以解决传统医疗服务面临的劳动力短缺和可及性问题。本综述旨在综合现有的关于心理聊天机器人干预的参与度、用户态度和有效性的研究。这些研究来自六个数据库:PubMed、PsycINFO、Web of Science、Science Direct、Scopus 和 IEEE Xplore。ResultsEngagement level with chatbots that comply with digital intervention standards, lead to positive mental health outcomes.虽然用户对这些工具的可用性存在一些不确定性,但由于聊天机器人的心理能力和独特功能,用户经常对聊天机器人的用户体验和可接受性持积极态度。抑郁症患者的疗效水平很高。人口统计学、心理学方法和特色技术的差异也会影响心理健康聊天机器人的表现程度。 结论对聊天机器人的积极态度和参与度以及积极的心理健康结果表明,聊天机器人技术是一种很有前景的心理健康干预方式。然而,在某些人群中使用聊天机器人或使用新功能时应慎重考虑。有必要使用主流心理健康聊天机器人开展进一步研究,并同时使用参与度、用户态度和有效性的标准化测量方法对其进行评估,以促进干预措施的开发。