Creating legitimacy for cultured meat in Germany: The role of social cohesion

IF 5.7 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1016/j.eist.2024.100871
D. Weckowska , D. Weiss , V. Fiala , F. Nemeczek , F. Voss , C. Dreher
{"title":"Creating legitimacy for cultured meat in Germany: The role of social cohesion","authors":"D. Weckowska ,&nbsp;D. Weiss ,&nbsp;V. Fiala ,&nbsp;F. Nemeczek ,&nbsp;F. Voss ,&nbsp;C. Dreher","doi":"10.1016/j.eist.2024.100871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Few studies on legitimation of new technologies were able to provide insights into the longitudinal changes in legitimacy outcomes and the social dynamics that underpin such outcomes. Using a novel mixed-methods approach, combining Natural Language Processing with a qualitative text analysis, and drawing on the concept of social cohesion to investigate the social relations among actors, the study offers new insights into the legitimation of cultured meat in Germany. Using 424 newspaper articles, we identify four topics in the public discourse related to cultured meat and positive average sentiment on each topic over the period 2011–2021. Furthermore, we find the actors, groups, and social relations that shape the observed legitimacy outcomes. The empirical findings are used to develop propositions about the role of social cohesion in legitimacy creation. The study paves the way for future studies on social cohesion dynamics in socio-technical change.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54294,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210422424000613/pdfft?md5=4e77aa587461d1a062379153b0fd5aef&pid=1-s2.0-S2210422424000613-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210422424000613","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Few studies on legitimation of new technologies were able to provide insights into the longitudinal changes in legitimacy outcomes and the social dynamics that underpin such outcomes. Using a novel mixed-methods approach, combining Natural Language Processing with a qualitative text analysis, and drawing on the concept of social cohesion to investigate the social relations among actors, the study offers new insights into the legitimation of cultured meat in Germany. Using 424 newspaper articles, we identify four topics in the public discourse related to cultured meat and positive average sentiment on each topic over the period 2011–2021. Furthermore, we find the actors, groups, and social relations that shape the observed legitimacy outcomes. The empirical findings are used to develop propositions about the role of social cohesion in legitimacy creation. The study paves the way for future studies on social cohesion dynamics in socio-technical change.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在德国为养殖肉类创造合法性:社会凝聚力的作用
很少有关于新技术合法性的研究能够深入探讨合法性结果的纵向变化以及支撑这种结果的社会动态。本研究采用了一种新颖的混合方法,将自然语言处理与定性文本分析相结合,并借鉴社会凝聚力的概念来调查参与者之间的社会关系,从而为德国养殖肉类的合法化提供了新的见解。通过使用 424 篇报纸文章,我们确定了 2011-2021 年间与养殖肉类相关的公共话语中的四个主题以及每个主题的积极平均情感。此外,我们还发现了影响所观察到的合法性结果的参与者、群体和社会关系。我们利用实证研究结果提出了关于社会凝聚力在合法性创造中的作用的命题。这项研究为今后研究社会技术变革中的社会凝聚力动态铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
90
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions serves as a platform for reporting studies on innovations and socio-economic transitions aimed at fostering an environmentally sustainable economy, thereby addressing structural resource scarcity and environmental challenges, particularly those associated with fossil energy use and climate change. The journal focuses on various forms of innovation, including technological, organizational, economic, institutional, and political, as well as economy-wide and sectoral changes in areas such as energy, transport, agriculture, and water management. It endeavors to tackle complex questions concerning social, economic, behavioral-psychological, and political barriers and opportunities, along with their intricate interactions. With a multidisciplinary approach and methodological openness, the journal welcomes contributions from a wide array of disciplines within the social, environmental, and innovation sciences.
期刊最新文献
The dynamics of change towards sustainability in developing countries: Evidence from Ghana's Waste-to-Energy transition Ideas behind transformative innovation policy: Economists confronting missions and sustainability transition in Finland Hibernation of off-grid solar e-waste in Kenya: An unintended response to an emerging waste issue Learning to (not quite) buy nothing: Digital gift economies and household innovations reducing consumption Developing the industrial capacity for energy transitions: Resource formation for offshore wind in Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1