Gastrointestinal functions after laparoscopic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis: a pilot randomized clinical trial on effects of abdominal drain, prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis, and D3 lymphadenectomy with complete mesocolic excision.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY International Journal of Colorectal Disease Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1007/s00384-024-04657-0
Giuseppe S Sica, Leandro Siragusa, Brunella Maria Pirozzi, Roberto Sorge, Giorgia Baldini, Cristina Fiorani, Andrea Martina Guida, Vittoria Bellato, Marzia Franceschilli
{"title":"Gastrointestinal functions after laparoscopic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis: a pilot randomized clinical trial on effects of abdominal drain, prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis, and D3 lymphadenectomy with complete mesocolic excision.","authors":"Giuseppe S Sica, Leandro Siragusa, Brunella Maria Pirozzi, Roberto Sorge, Giorgia Baldini, Cristina Fiorani, Andrea Martina Guida, Vittoria Bellato, Marzia Franceschilli","doi":"10.1007/s00384-024-04657-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Routine use of abdominal drain or prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis is no longer part of current clinical practice in colorectal surgery. Nevertheless, in patients undergoing laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis (ICA), it may reduce perioperative abdominal contamination. Furthermore, in cancer patients, prolonged surgery with extensive dissection such as central vascular ligation and complete mesocolon excision with D3 lymphadenectomy (altogether radical right colectomy RRC) is called responsible for affecting postoperative ileus. The aim was to evaluate postoperative resumption of gastrointestinal functions in patients undergoing right hemicolectomy for cancer with ICA and standard D2 dissection or RRC, with or without abdominal drain and prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Monocentric factorial parallel arm randomized pilot trial including all consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and ICA for cancer, in 20 months. Patients were randomized on a 1:1:1 ratio to receive abdominal drain, prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis or neither (I level), and 1:1 to receive RRC or D2 colectomy (II level). Patients were not blinded. The primary aim was the resumption of gastrointestinal functions (time to first gas and stool, time to tolerated fluids and food). Secondary aims were length of stay and complications' rate.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov no. NCT04977882.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-seven patients were screened; according to sample size, 36 were randomized, 12 for each arm for postoperative management, and 18 for each arm according to surgical techniques. A difference in time to solid diet favored the group without drain or antibiotic independently from standard or RRC. Furthermore, when patients were divided with respect to surgical technique and into matched cohorts, no differences were seen for primary and secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Abdominal drainage and prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing right hemicolectomy for cancer with ICA seem to negatively affect the resumption of a solid diet after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with ICA for cancer. RRC does not seem to influence gastrointestinal function recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11227461/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-024-04657-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Routine use of abdominal drain or prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis is no longer part of current clinical practice in colorectal surgery. Nevertheless, in patients undergoing laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis (ICA), it may reduce perioperative abdominal contamination. Furthermore, in cancer patients, prolonged surgery with extensive dissection such as central vascular ligation and complete mesocolon excision with D3 lymphadenectomy (altogether radical right colectomy RRC) is called responsible for affecting postoperative ileus. The aim was to evaluate postoperative resumption of gastrointestinal functions in patients undergoing right hemicolectomy for cancer with ICA and standard D2 dissection or RRC, with or without abdominal drain and prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis.

Methods: Monocentric factorial parallel arm randomized pilot trial including all consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and ICA for cancer, in 20 months. Patients were randomized on a 1:1:1 ratio to receive abdominal drain, prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis or neither (I level), and 1:1 to receive RRC or D2 colectomy (II level). Patients were not blinded. The primary aim was the resumption of gastrointestinal functions (time to first gas and stool, time to tolerated fluids and food). Secondary aims were length of stay and complications' rate.

Clinicaltrials: gov no. NCT04977882.

Results: Fifty-seven patients were screened; according to sample size, 36 were randomized, 12 for each arm for postoperative management, and 18 for each arm according to surgical techniques. A difference in time to solid diet favored the group without drain or antibiotic independently from standard or RRC. Furthermore, when patients were divided with respect to surgical technique and into matched cohorts, no differences were seen for primary and secondary outcomes.

Conclusion: Abdominal drainage and prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing right hemicolectomy for cancer with ICA seem to negatively affect the resumption of a solid diet after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with ICA for cancer. RRC does not seem to influence gastrointestinal function recovery.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜右结肠切除术与体腔内吻合术后的胃肠功能:关于腹腔引流管、长期抗生素预防和D3淋巴结切除术与完整结肠系膜切除术效果的试验性随机临床试验。
目的:常规使用腹腔引流管或长期抗生素预防已不再是当前结直肠外科临床实践的一部分。尽管如此,对于接受腹腔镜右半结肠切除术和体腔内吻合术(ICA)的患者来说,使用腹腔引流管或延长抗生素预防性治疗可减少围手术期的腹腔污染。此外,在癌症患者中,长时间的手术和广泛的解剖,如中央血管结扎和完整的结肠系膜切除术以及 D3 淋巴腺切除术(完全根治性右结肠切除术 RRC)被认为是影响术后回肠的原因。该研究旨在评估因癌症接受右半结肠切除术的患者术后胃肠道功能恢复情况,这些患者接受了 ICA 和标准 D2 切除术或 RRC,并接受或不接受腹腔引流和长期抗生素预防治疗:方法:单中心因子平行臂随机试验,包括所有在 20 个月内连续接受腹腔镜右半结肠切除术和 ICA 的癌症患者。患者按1:1:1的比例随机接受腹腔引流、长期抗生素预防或两者都不接受(I级),按1:1的比例随机接受RRC或D2结肠切除术(II级)。患者不设盲法。主要目标是恢复胃肠道功能(首次排气和排便时间、可耐受液体和食物的时间)。次要目标是住院时间和并发症发生率。NCT04977882.Results:共筛选出57名患者,根据样本量随机分为36组,每组12人进行术后管理,每组18人根据手术技术进行术后管理。无引流管或抗生素组与标准组或 RRC 组在进食固体食物的时间上存在差异。此外,根据手术技术将患者分为匹配组后,在主要和次要结果上没有发现差异:结论:腹腔引流和长期抗生素预防似乎会对腹腔镜右半结肠癌ICA切除术后恢复固体饮食产生负面影响。RRC似乎不会影响胃肠功能的恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
206
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Colorectal Disease, Clinical and Molecular Gastroenterology and Surgery aims to publish novel and state-of-the-art papers which deal with the physiology and pathophysiology of diseases involving the entire gastrointestinal tract. In addition to original research articles, the following categories will be included: reviews (usually commissioned but may also be submitted), case reports, letters to the editor, and protocols on clinical studies. The journal offers its readers an interdisciplinary forum for clinical science and molecular research related to gastrointestinal disease.
期刊最新文献
Risk of metachronous colorectal cancer associated with polypectomy during endoscopic diagnosis of colorectal cancer. A multi-docking strategy for robotic LAR and deep pelvic surgery with the Hugo RAS system: experience from a tertiary referral center. Does the initial treatment of primary tumor impact prognosis after recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer? Results from a retrospective cohort analysis. Effect of powered circular stapler in colorectal anastomosis after left-sided colic resection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Subcutaneous infliximab in Crohn's disease patients with previous immunogenic failure of intravenous infliximab.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1