Optimizing Readability of Patient-Facing Hand Surgery Education Materials Using Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT) 3.5

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.05.007
{"title":"Optimizing Readability of Patient-Facing Hand Surgery Education Materials Using Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT) 3.5","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.05.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To address patient health literacy, the American Medical Association and the National Institutes of Health recommend that readability of patient education materials should not exceed an eighth grade reading level. However, patient-facing materials often remain above the recommended average reading level. Current online calculators provide readability scores; however, they lack the ability to provide text-specific feedback, which may streamline the process of simplifying patient materials. The purpose of this study was to evaluate Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT) 3.5 as a tool for optimizing patient-facing hand surgery education materials through reading level analysis and simplification.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The readability of 18 patient-facing hand surgery education materials was compared by a traditional online calculator for reading level and ChatGPT 3.5. The original excerpts were then entered into ChatGPT 3.5 and simplified by the artificial intelligence tool. The simplified excerpts were scored by the same calculators.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The readability scores for the original excerpts from the online calculator and ChatGPT 3.5 were similar. The simplified excerpts’ scores were lower than the originals, with a mean of 7.28, less than the maximum recommended 8.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The use of ChatGPT 3.5 for the purpose of simplification and readability analysis of patient-facing hand surgery materials is efficient and may help facilitate the conveyance of important health information. ChatGPT 3.5 rendered readability scores comparable with traditional readability calculators, in addition to excerpt-specific feedback. It was also able to simplify materials to the recommended grade levels.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><div>By confirming ChatGPT3.5’s ability to assess and simplify patient education materials, this study offers a practical solution for potentially improving patient comprehension, engagement, and health outcomes in clinical settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":"49 10","pages":"Pages 986-991"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036350232400234X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To address patient health literacy, the American Medical Association and the National Institutes of Health recommend that readability of patient education materials should not exceed an eighth grade reading level. However, patient-facing materials often remain above the recommended average reading level. Current online calculators provide readability scores; however, they lack the ability to provide text-specific feedback, which may streamline the process of simplifying patient materials. The purpose of this study was to evaluate Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT) 3.5 as a tool for optimizing patient-facing hand surgery education materials through reading level analysis and simplification.

Methods

The readability of 18 patient-facing hand surgery education materials was compared by a traditional online calculator for reading level and ChatGPT 3.5. The original excerpts were then entered into ChatGPT 3.5 and simplified by the artificial intelligence tool. The simplified excerpts were scored by the same calculators.

Results

The readability scores for the original excerpts from the online calculator and ChatGPT 3.5 were similar. The simplified excerpts’ scores were lower than the originals, with a mean of 7.28, less than the maximum recommended 8.

Conclusions

The use of ChatGPT 3.5 for the purpose of simplification and readability analysis of patient-facing hand surgery materials is efficient and may help facilitate the conveyance of important health information. ChatGPT 3.5 rendered readability scores comparable with traditional readability calculators, in addition to excerpt-specific feedback. It was also able to simplify materials to the recommended grade levels.

Clinical relevance

By confirming ChatGPT3.5’s ability to assess and simplify patient education materials, this study offers a practical solution for potentially improving patient comprehension, engagement, and health outcomes in clinical settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用 Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer 3.5 优化面向患者的手外科教育材料的可读性。
目的:为提高患者的健康素养,美国医学会和美国国立卫生研究院建议,患者教育材料的可读性不应超过八年级的阅读水平。然而,面向患者的材料往往高于建议的平均阅读水平。目前的在线计算器可提供可读性评分;但它们缺乏提供特定文本反馈的能力,而这可能会简化简化患者材料的过程。本研究的目的是评估 Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer(ChatGPT)3.5,将其作为通过阅读水平分析和简化来优化面向患者的手外科教育材料的工具:通过传统的在线阅读水平计算器和 ChatGPT 3.5 比较了 18 种面向患者的手外科教育材料的可读性。然后将原始摘录输入 ChatGPT 3.5,并通过人工智能工具进行简化。结果:在线计算器和 ChatGPT 3.5 对原始摘录的可读性评分相似。简化摘录的得分低于原文,平均为 7.28 分,低于建议的最高分 8.Conclusions:使用 ChatGPT 3.5 对面向患者的手外科材料进行简化和可读性分析是有效的,有助于促进重要健康信息的传达。ChatGPT 3.5 提供的可读性评分与传统的可读性计算器相当,此外还提供了针对特定节选的反馈。它还能将材料简化到建议的年级水平:本研究证实了 ChatGPT3.5 评估和简化患者教育材料的能力,为临床环境中提高患者理解能力、参与度和健康结果提供了实用的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
10.50%
发文量
402
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Biomechanics of a Scapholunate Bridge Augmentation Technique Using All-Suture, Knotless Anchors. Hand Surgery in Patients with a History of Lymphedema: A Review of Current Concepts and Opinions. Hand Surgery Landscape Article-Peer Review in Upper-Extremity Surgery: Essential Strategies for Reviewers. Postoperative Immobilization After Foveal Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies. The Yield of Postoperative Clinical Follow-Up Following Minor Hand Surgery: Is a Face-to-Face Encounter Necessary?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1