The impact of onset-to-cut time in surgery for stable acute type A aortic dissection-a single-centre retrospective cohort study.

0 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivae130
Leonard Pitts, Markus Kofler, Matteo Montagner, Roland Heck, Stephan Dominik Kurz, Alexandru Claudiu Paun, Volkmar Falk, Jörg Kempfert
{"title":"The impact of onset-to-cut time in surgery for stable acute type A aortic dissection-a single-centre retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Leonard Pitts, Markus Kofler, Matteo Montagner, Roland Heck, Stephan Dominik Kurz, Alexandru Claudiu Paun, Volkmar Falk, Jörg Kempfert","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivae130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The goal of this study was to investigate the impact of onset-to-cut time on mortality in patients undergoing surgery for stable acute type A aortic dissection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent surgery for acute type A aortic dissection between January 2006 and December 2021 and available onset-to-cut times were included. Patients with unstable aortic dissection (preoperative shock, intubation, resuscitation, coma, pericardial tamponade and local/systemic malperfusion syndromes) were excluded. After descriptive analysis, a multivariable binary logistic regression for 30-day mortality was performed. A receiver operating characteristic curve for onset-to-cut time and 30-day mortality was calculated. Restricted cubic splines were designed to investigate the association between onset-to-cut time and survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final cohort comprised 362 patients. The median onset-to-cut time was 543 (376-1155) min. The 30-day mortality was 9%. Only previous myocardial infarction (P = 0.018) and prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time (P < 0.001) were identified as independent risk factors for 30-day mortality. The corresponding area under the receiver operating characteristic curve showed a value of 0.49. Restricted cubic splines did not indicate an association between onset-to-cut time and survival (P = 0.316).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Onset-to-cut time in the setting of stable acute type A aortic dissection does not seem to be a valid predictor of 30-day mortality in patients undergoing surgery and stayed stable during the preoperative course.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11272170/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivae130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The goal of this study was to investigate the impact of onset-to-cut time on mortality in patients undergoing surgery for stable acute type A aortic dissection.

Methods: Patients who underwent surgery for acute type A aortic dissection between January 2006 and December 2021 and available onset-to-cut times were included. Patients with unstable aortic dissection (preoperative shock, intubation, resuscitation, coma, pericardial tamponade and local/systemic malperfusion syndromes) were excluded. After descriptive analysis, a multivariable binary logistic regression for 30-day mortality was performed. A receiver operating characteristic curve for onset-to-cut time and 30-day mortality was calculated. Restricted cubic splines were designed to investigate the association between onset-to-cut time and survival.

Results: The final cohort comprised 362 patients. The median onset-to-cut time was 543 (376-1155) min. The 30-day mortality was 9%. Only previous myocardial infarction (P = 0.018) and prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time (P < 0.001) were identified as independent risk factors for 30-day mortality. The corresponding area under the receiver operating characteristic curve showed a value of 0.49. Restricted cubic splines did not indicate an association between onset-to-cut time and survival (P = 0.316).

Conclusions: Onset-to-cut time in the setting of stable acute type A aortic dissection does not seem to be a valid predictor of 30-day mortality in patients undergoing surgery and stayed stable during the preoperative course.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
稳定型急性主动脉夹层手术中发病到切开时间的影响--一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
研究目的研究目的是调查发病至切口时间对接受手术治疗稳定型急性 A 型主动脉夹层患者死亡率的影响:纳入 2006 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 12 日期间因急性 A 型主动脉夹层接受手术治疗的患者,并提供发病至切口时间。排除不稳定型主动脉夹层患者(术前休克、插管、复苏、昏迷、心包填塞和局部/全身灌注不良综合征)。在进行描述性分析后,对三十天死亡率进行了多变量二元逻辑回归。计算了发病至切口时间和三十天死亡率的接收器操作特征曲线。设计了限制性三次样条,以研究发病至切口时间与生存率之间的关系:结果:最终队列中有 362 名患者。结果:最终队列由 362 名患者组成,发病到切割的中位时间为 543 (376-1155) 分钟。30天死亡率为9%。只有曾患心肌梗死(p = 0.018)和心肺旁路时间延长(p = 0.018)的患者死亡率较高:对于接受手术且术前病情保持稳定的患者来说,在病情稳定的急性 A 型主动脉夹层情况下,起始至切口时间似乎并不是预测 30 天死亡率的有效指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Return to work after parenting in thoracic surgery: a call to action. Value of observational studies in the outcome evaluation of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement. Prosthesis selection for reconstruction of superior vena cava: comparison of midterm patency rates. Prophylactic ablation during cardiac surgery in patients without atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. A case of superior trunk brachial plexus injury after right mini-thoracotomy mitral valve repair.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1