Storage, pattern and driving factors of soil organic carbon in the desert rangelands of northern Xinjiang, north-west China

IF 1.8 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Frontiers of Earth Science Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1007/s11707-022-0978-1
Huixia Liu, Zongjiu Sun, Yuxuan Cui, Yiqiang Dong, Panxing He, Shazhou An, Xianhua Zhang
{"title":"Storage, pattern and driving factors of soil organic carbon in the desert rangelands of northern Xinjiang, north-west China","authors":"Huixia Liu, Zongjiu Sun, Yuxuan Cui, Yiqiang Dong, Panxing He, Shazhou An, Xianhua Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s11707-022-0978-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil organic carbon (SOC) is a critical variable used to determine the carbon balance. However, large uncertainties arise when predicting the SOC stock in soil profiles in Chinese grasslands, especially on desert rangelands. Recent studies have shown that desert ecosystems may be potential carbon sinks under global climate change. Because of the high spatial heterogeneity, time-consuming sampling methods, and difficult acquisition process, the relationships the SOC storage and distribution have with driving factors in desert rangelands remain poorly understood. Here, we investigated and developed an SOC database from 3162 soil samples (collected at depths of 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm) across 527 sites, as well as the climate conditions, vegetation types, and edaphic factors associated with the sampling sites in the desert rangelands of northern Xinjiang, north-west China. This study aims to determine the SOC magnitude and drivers in desert rangelands. Our findings demonstrate that the SOC and SOC density (SOCD) were 0.05–37.13 g·kg<sup>−1</sup> and 19.23–9740.62 g·m<sup>−2</sup>, respectively, with average values of 6.81 ± 5.31 g·kg<sup>−1</sup> and 1670.38 ± 1202.52 g·m<sup>−2</sup>, respectively. The spatial distributions of SOC and SOCD all showed gradually decreasing trends from south-west to north-east. High-SOC areas were mainly distributed in the piedmont lowlands of the Ili valley, while low-SOC regions were mainly concentrated in the north-west area of Altay. The redundancy analysis results revealed that all environmental factors accounted for approximately 37.6% of the spatial variability in SOC; climate factors, vegetation factors, and soil properties explained 15.0%, 1.7%, and 12.3%, respectively. The structural equation model (SEM) further indicated that evapotranspiration, average annual precipitation, and the SWC were the dominant factors affecting SOC accumulation, mainly through direct effects, although indirect effects were also delivered by the vegetation factors. Taken together, the results obtained herein updated the SOC data pool available for desert rangelands and clarified the main driving factors of SOC variations. This study provided supporting data for the sustainable use and management of desert rangelands and the global ecosystem carbon budget.</p>","PeriodicalId":48927,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Earth Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Earth Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-022-0978-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil organic carbon (SOC) is a critical variable used to determine the carbon balance. However, large uncertainties arise when predicting the SOC stock in soil profiles in Chinese grasslands, especially on desert rangelands. Recent studies have shown that desert ecosystems may be potential carbon sinks under global climate change. Because of the high spatial heterogeneity, time-consuming sampling methods, and difficult acquisition process, the relationships the SOC storage and distribution have with driving factors in desert rangelands remain poorly understood. Here, we investigated and developed an SOC database from 3162 soil samples (collected at depths of 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm) across 527 sites, as well as the climate conditions, vegetation types, and edaphic factors associated with the sampling sites in the desert rangelands of northern Xinjiang, north-west China. This study aims to determine the SOC magnitude and drivers in desert rangelands. Our findings demonstrate that the SOC and SOC density (SOCD) were 0.05–37.13 g·kg−1 and 19.23–9740.62 g·m−2, respectively, with average values of 6.81 ± 5.31 g·kg−1 and 1670.38 ± 1202.52 g·m−2, respectively. The spatial distributions of SOC and SOCD all showed gradually decreasing trends from south-west to north-east. High-SOC areas were mainly distributed in the piedmont lowlands of the Ili valley, while low-SOC regions were mainly concentrated in the north-west area of Altay. The redundancy analysis results revealed that all environmental factors accounted for approximately 37.6% of the spatial variability in SOC; climate factors, vegetation factors, and soil properties explained 15.0%, 1.7%, and 12.3%, respectively. The structural equation model (SEM) further indicated that evapotranspiration, average annual precipitation, and the SWC were the dominant factors affecting SOC accumulation, mainly through direct effects, although indirect effects were also delivered by the vegetation factors. Taken together, the results obtained herein updated the SOC data pool available for desert rangelands and clarified the main driving factors of SOC variations. This study provided supporting data for the sustainable use and management of desert rangelands and the global ecosystem carbon budget.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国西北部新疆北部荒漠牧场土壤有机碳的储存、模式及驱动因素
土壤有机碳(SOC)是确定碳平衡的关键变量。然而,在预测中国草地(尤其是荒漠牧场)土壤剖面中的 SOC 储量时,存在很大的不确定性。最近的研究表明,在全球气候变化的情况下,荒漠生态系统可能是潜在的碳汇。由于空间异质性高、采样方法耗时长、获取过程困难,人们对荒漠牧场中 SOC 储量和分布与驱动因素的关系仍然知之甚少。在此,我们对中国西北部新疆北部荒漠牧场的527个地点的3162个土壤样本(采集深度为0-10厘米和10-20厘米),以及与采样地点相关的气候条件、植被类型和环境因子进行了调查,并建立了SOC数据库。本研究旨在确定荒漠牧场的 SOC 量级和驱动因素。研究结果表明,SOC和SOC密度(SOCD)分别为0.05-37.13 g-kg-1和19.23-9740.62 g-m-2,平均值分别为6.81 ± 5.31 g-kg-1和1670.38 ± 1202.52 g-m-2。SOC 和 SOCD 的空间分布均呈自西南向东北逐渐降低的趋势。高 SOC 区域主要分布在伊犁河谷的山麓低地,而低 SOC 区域主要集中在阿勒泰西北部地区。冗余分析结果显示,所有环境因素约占 SOC 空间变异的 37.6%;气候因素、植被因素和土壤特性分别解释了 15.0%、1.7% 和 12.3%。结构方程模型(SEM)进一步表明,蒸散量、年平均降水量和 SWC 是影响 SOC 积累的主导因素,主要通过直接效应产生影响,但植被因子也会产生间接效应。综上所述,本研究的结果更新了沙漠牧场的 SOC 数据库,并阐明了 SOC 变化的主要驱动因素。这项研究为荒漠牧场的可持续利用和管理以及全球生态系统碳预算提供了支持数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers of Earth Science
Frontiers of Earth Science GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
627
期刊介绍: Frontiers of Earth Science publishes original, peer-reviewed, theoretical and experimental frontier research papers as well as significant review articles of more general interest to earth scientists. The journal features articles dealing with observations, patterns, processes, and modeling of both innerspheres (including deep crust, mantle, and core) and outerspheres (including atmosphere, hydrosphere, and biosphere) of the earth. Its aim is to promote communication and share knowledge among the international earth science communities
期刊最新文献
Case studies of hailstorms in Shandong Province using hail size discrimination algorithm based on dual Polarimetric parameters Experimental analysis of dust deposition and physical weathering intensity in the Gobi Desert Sedimentary architecture of a sandy braided river with seasonal hydrodynamic variations: insights from the Permian Lower Shihezi Formation, Ordos Basin, China Projected changes of runoff in the Upper Yellow River Basin under shared socioeconomic pathways Applying 3D geological modeling to predict favorable areas for coalbed methane accumulation: a case study in the Qinshui Basin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1