Catriona D. Campbell, Anna J. MacDonald, Stephen D. Sarre
{"title":"Evaluation of genetic markers for the metabarcoding of Australian marsupials from predator scats","authors":"Catriona D. Campbell, Anna J. MacDonald, Stephen D. Sarre","doi":"10.1071/wr23134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong> Context</strong><p>DNA recovered from predator faeces (scats) can be used to determine the presence of fauna and shed light on their life histories and inter-species interactions. DNA metabarcoding, which involves concurrent amplification and sequencing of DNA from multiple taxa, represents an important advance by enabling the simultaneous detection of multiple species from such samples. Although an attractive proposition, metabarcoding requires ‘universally’ applicable genetic markers that can discriminate among a broad range of taxa, while also targeting sequences that are sufficiently short to be amplified from degraded DNA.</p><strong> Aims</strong><p>To identify, evaluate, and test metabarcoding DNA markers suitable for the detection of marsupials and other Australian fauna from terrestrial predator scats found in nature.</p><strong> Methods</strong><p>We apply a bioinformatic approach using publicly available DNA databases and a locally derived and marker-specific reference-DNA database to evaluate the diagnostic ability and likelihood of amplification of candidate metabarcoding markers for marsupials and other taxa that may be consumed by predators.</p><strong> Key results</strong><p>We identify two markers (12SV5 and 16SMam) that are suitable for use and successfully identify marsupial sequences at a high level of resolution. These markers work best in combination because they bring complementary levels of primer specificity and diagnostic ability in detecting multiple prey species as well as the predator. We also show that these samples work well in predator scats sampled from the wild in Tasmania.</p><strong> Conclusions</strong><p>These markers provide a useful tool for surveying mammalian predators and their prey and could also be applied to eDNA analyses from other sample types. Improvements to the reference database and further development of markers targeting different taxonomic groups will improve the resolution and usefulness of this approach.</p><strong> Implications</strong><p>Metabarcoding of predator scats provides a potent approach to non-invasive wildlife survey that offers the opportunity for the detection of multiple species across all vertebrates.</p>","PeriodicalId":23971,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Research","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wildlife Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/wr23134","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context
DNA recovered from predator faeces (scats) can be used to determine the presence of fauna and shed light on their life histories and inter-species interactions. DNA metabarcoding, which involves concurrent amplification and sequencing of DNA from multiple taxa, represents an important advance by enabling the simultaneous detection of multiple species from such samples. Although an attractive proposition, metabarcoding requires ‘universally’ applicable genetic markers that can discriminate among a broad range of taxa, while also targeting sequences that are sufficiently short to be amplified from degraded DNA.
Aims
To identify, evaluate, and test metabarcoding DNA markers suitable for the detection of marsupials and other Australian fauna from terrestrial predator scats found in nature.
Methods
We apply a bioinformatic approach using publicly available DNA databases and a locally derived and marker-specific reference-DNA database to evaluate the diagnostic ability and likelihood of amplification of candidate metabarcoding markers for marsupials and other taxa that may be consumed by predators.
Key results
We identify two markers (12SV5 and 16SMam) that are suitable for use and successfully identify marsupial sequences at a high level of resolution. These markers work best in combination because they bring complementary levels of primer specificity and diagnostic ability in detecting multiple prey species as well as the predator. We also show that these samples work well in predator scats sampled from the wild in Tasmania.
Conclusions
These markers provide a useful tool for surveying mammalian predators and their prey and could also be applied to eDNA analyses from other sample types. Improvements to the reference database and further development of markers targeting different taxonomic groups will improve the resolution and usefulness of this approach.
Implications
Metabarcoding of predator scats provides a potent approach to non-invasive wildlife survey that offers the opportunity for the detection of multiple species across all vertebrates.
背景从捕食者粪便(粪便)中提取的 DNA 可用于确定动物的存在,并揭示其生活史和物种间的相互作用。DNA 代谢编码(metabarcoding)涉及对多个分类群的 DNA 同时进行扩增和测序,能够从此类样本中同时检测多个物种,是一项重要的进步。尽管元标码是一个很有吸引力的提议,但它需要 "普遍 "适用的遗传标记,这些标记能够区分广泛的类群,同时还针对足够短的序列,以便从降解的 DNA 中扩增。目的识别、评估和测试元条码 DNA 标记,以从自然界中发现的陆生食肉动物粪便中检测有袋类动物和其他澳大利亚动物。方法我们采用一种生物信息学方法,利用公开的 DNA 数据库和本地衍生的、标记特异的参考 DNA 数据库,评估候选元条码标记对有袋类动物和其他可能被捕食者食用的类群的诊断能力和扩增可能性。主要结果我们确定了两个适合使用的标记(12SV5 和 16SMam),并成功地以高分辨率识别了有袋动物的序列。这些标记结合使用效果最佳,因为它们在检测多个猎物物种以及捕食者方面具有互补的引物特异性和诊断能力。我们还发现,这些样本在塔斯马尼亚野外采集的捕食者粪便样本中效果良好。结论这些标记为调查哺乳动物捕食者及其猎物提供了有用的工具,也可应用于其他样本类型的 eDNA 分析。参考数据库的改进和针对不同分类群标记的进一步开发将提高这种方法的分辨率和实用性。意义捕食者粪便的元标码为非侵入性野生动物调查提供了一种有效的方法,为检测所有脊椎动物中的多个物种提供了机会。
期刊介绍:
Wildlife Research represents an international forum for the publication of research and debate on the ecology, management and conservation of wild animals in natural and modified habitats. The journal combines basic research in wildlife ecology with advances in science-based management practice. Subject areas include: applied ecology; conservation biology; ecosystem management; management of over-abundant, pest and invasive species; global change and wildlife management; diseases and their impacts on wildlife populations; human dimensions of management and conservation; assessing management outcomes; and the implications of wildlife research for policy development. Readers can expect a range of papers covering well-structured field studies, manipulative experiments, and analytical and modelling studies. All articles aim to improve the practice of wildlife management and contribute conceptual advances to our knowledge and understanding of wildlife ecology.
Wildlife Research is a vital resource for wildlife scientists, students and managers, applied ecologists, conservation biologists, environmental consultants and NGOs and government policy advisors.
Wildlife Research is published with the endorsement of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the Australian Academy of Science.