{"title":"Cancellation for (G,n)-complexes and the Swan Finiteness Obstruction","authors":"John Nicholson","doi":"10.1093/imrn/rnae141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In previous work, we related homotopy types of finite $(G,n)$-complexes when $G$ has periodic cohomology to projective ${\\mathbb{Z}} G$-modules representing the Swan finiteness obstruction. We use this to determine when $X \\vee S^{n} \\simeq Y \\vee S^{n}$ implies $X \\simeq Y$ for finite $(G,n)$-complexes $X$ and $Y$, and give lower bounds on the number of homotopically distinct pairs when this fails. The proof involves constructing projective ${\\mathbb{Z}} G$-modules as lifts of locally free modules over orders in products of quaternion algebras, whose existence follows from the Eichler mass formula. In the case $n=2$, difficulties arise that lead to a new approach to finding a counterexample to Wall’s D2 problem.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/imrn/rnae141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In previous work, we related homotopy types of finite $(G,n)$-complexes when $G$ has periodic cohomology to projective ${\mathbb{Z}} G$-modules representing the Swan finiteness obstruction. We use this to determine when $X \vee S^{n} \simeq Y \vee S^{n}$ implies $X \simeq Y$ for finite $(G,n)$-complexes $X$ and $Y$, and give lower bounds on the number of homotopically distinct pairs when this fails. The proof involves constructing projective ${\mathbb{Z}} G$-modules as lifts of locally free modules over orders in products of quaternion algebras, whose existence follows from the Eichler mass formula. In the case $n=2$, difficulties arise that lead to a new approach to finding a counterexample to Wall’s D2 problem.