Exploring stakeholder perceptions and policy implications for strategic managment of large‐size classes: A systematic literature review

IF 2.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Review of Education Pub Date : 2024-06-20 DOI:10.1002/rev3.3481
Homa Molavi
{"title":"Exploring stakeholder perceptions and policy implications for strategic managment of large‐size classes: A systematic literature review","authors":"Homa Molavi","doi":"10.1002/rev3.3481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inevitably having large‐size classes creates a huge number of challenges but also benefits that motivate the higher education institutes to recruit large‐size student bodies. This paper aims to identify the focus of scholars in this field, how the concerns have been addressed as well as a pedagogic basis for large‐class management and delivery, then further to determine gaps in the existing literature of large‐size classes. Using PRISMA, this research systematically reviews 131 articles between 1976 and 2024 on an international basis. Building upon the findings of the systematic literature review (SLR), the study introduces the Input‐Process‐Output‐Outcome (IPOO) model of education. Then, the research discusses a range of strategies proposed in academic research to effectively address the challenges posed by large class sizes. These strategies include pedagogical approaches/strategies, perception and behaviour‐based means, technological tools/strategies, and perception‐driven digitised strategies. The article identifies research gaps in the existing literature, particularly regarding stakeholders' perceptions of large class sizes. It emphasises the need for further investigation into the diverse perspectives held by stakeholders regarding the pros and cons of large class environments. The findings underscore the importance of challenging negative and neutral perceptions of large class sizes. Additionally, the study highlights the role of marketing strategies in shaping perceptions of class size and suggests avenues for future research in education business. Finally, the results of the bibliometric analysis reveal specific geographical or disciplinary focuses. The study provides insights for policymakers on developing effective policies to manage large class sizes and suggests future research avenues in education business and policy.<jats:boxed-text content-type=\"box\" position=\"anchor\"><jats:caption>Context and implications</jats:caption>Rationale for this studyMotivated by the increasing prevalence of large class sizes in higher education institutions (HEIs) globally, driven by factors such as massification and marketisation. It aims to examine (dis)advantages associated with large classes while considering the diverse perspectives of stakeholders involved. Conducting a SLR and introducing the IPOO model, it aims to pinpoint gaps in managing large classes effectively.Why the new findings matterThe study addresses research gaps, particularly in understanding how perceptions shape educational practices. By highlighting the need to challenge negative perceptions, it emphasises their impact on outcomes and institutional strategies. Additionally, it identifies the role of marketing strategies in shaping perceptions and provides insights for education business.Implications for policy makers, stakeholders and the general publicThe study's implications span education sectors: practitioners can glean insights for managing large classes. Policymakers can utilise this research to inform the development of policies pertaining to class size regulations and resource allocation, ensuring that HEIs receive the necessary support to address challenges arising from large class sizes. Researchers are prompted to study perceptions surrounding class sizes. Funders can support research on class size perceptions, aiding evidence‐based decision making and resource distribution. Finally, the general public can benefit from increased awareness of the complexities surrounding class size dynamics, fostering a broader understanding of the challenges faced by educators and institutions in delivering quality education in large class settings.</jats:boxed-text>","PeriodicalId":45076,"journal":{"name":"Review of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inevitably having large‐size classes creates a huge number of challenges but also benefits that motivate the higher education institutes to recruit large‐size student bodies. This paper aims to identify the focus of scholars in this field, how the concerns have been addressed as well as a pedagogic basis for large‐class management and delivery, then further to determine gaps in the existing literature of large‐size classes. Using PRISMA, this research systematically reviews 131 articles between 1976 and 2024 on an international basis. Building upon the findings of the systematic literature review (SLR), the study introduces the Input‐Process‐Output‐Outcome (IPOO) model of education. Then, the research discusses a range of strategies proposed in academic research to effectively address the challenges posed by large class sizes. These strategies include pedagogical approaches/strategies, perception and behaviour‐based means, technological tools/strategies, and perception‐driven digitised strategies. The article identifies research gaps in the existing literature, particularly regarding stakeholders' perceptions of large class sizes. It emphasises the need for further investigation into the diverse perspectives held by stakeholders regarding the pros and cons of large class environments. The findings underscore the importance of challenging negative and neutral perceptions of large class sizes. Additionally, the study highlights the role of marketing strategies in shaping perceptions of class size and suggests avenues for future research in education business. Finally, the results of the bibliometric analysis reveal specific geographical or disciplinary focuses. The study provides insights for policymakers on developing effective policies to manage large class sizes and suggests future research avenues in education business and policy.Context and implicationsRationale for this studyMotivated by the increasing prevalence of large class sizes in higher education institutions (HEIs) globally, driven by factors such as massification and marketisation. It aims to examine (dis)advantages associated with large classes while considering the diverse perspectives of stakeholders involved. Conducting a SLR and introducing the IPOO model, it aims to pinpoint gaps in managing large classes effectively.Why the new findings matterThe study addresses research gaps, particularly in understanding how perceptions shape educational practices. By highlighting the need to challenge negative perceptions, it emphasises their impact on outcomes and institutional strategies. Additionally, it identifies the role of marketing strategies in shaping perceptions and provides insights for education business.Implications for policy makers, stakeholders and the general publicThe study's implications span education sectors: practitioners can glean insights for managing large classes. Policymakers can utilise this research to inform the development of policies pertaining to class size regulations and resource allocation, ensuring that HEIs receive the necessary support to address challenges arising from large class sizes. Researchers are prompted to study perceptions surrounding class sizes. Funders can support research on class size perceptions, aiding evidence‐based decision making and resource distribution. Finally, the general public can benefit from increased awareness of the complexities surrounding class size dynamics, fostering a broader understanding of the challenges faced by educators and institutions in delivering quality education in large class settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索利益相关者对大班战略管理的看法和政策影响:系统文献综述
大班教学不可避免地会带来大量挑战,但同时也会带来好处,促使高等教育机构招收大班学生。本文旨在确定学者们在这一领域的关注点、如何解决这些问题以及大班管理和授课的教学基础,然后进一步确定现有大班文献中的不足之处。本研究采用 PRISMA 方法,系统回顾了 1976 年至 2024 年间的 131 篇国际性文章。在系统文献综述(SLR)结果的基础上,本研究介绍了教育的投入-过程-产出-结果(IPOO)模型。然后,研究讨论了学术研究中提出的一系列策略,以有效应对大班额带来的挑战。这些策略包括教学方法/策略、基于感知和行为的手段、技术工具/策略以及感知驱动的数字化策略。文章指出了现有文献中的研究空白,特别是利益相关者对大班额的看法。文章强调,有必要进一步调查利益相关者对大班环境利弊的不同看法。研究结果强调了挑战对大班额的负面和中性看法的重要性。此外,研究还强调了营销策略在形成对大班额的看法方面所起的作用,并提出了未来教育商业研究的途径。最后,文献计量分析的结果揭示了特定的地域或学科重点。本研究为政策制定者提供了制定有效政策管理大班额的见解,并提出了教育商业和政策方面的未来研究途径。 本研究的背景和意义 本研究的背景和意义 本研究的背景和意义 本研究的背景和意义 本研究的背景和意义 本研究的背景和意义 本研究的背景和意义 本研究的背景和意义 本研究的背景和意义 本研究的背景和意义 本研究的背景和意义 本研究的背景和意义 本研究的背景和意义 本研究的背景和意义 本研究的背景和意义 本研究的背景和意义 本研究的背景和意义研究的背景和意义本研究旨在探讨与大班额相关的(不)优势,同时考虑相关利益方的不同观点。这项研究填补了研究空白,尤其是在了解观念如何影响教育实践方面。通过强调挑战负面观念的必要性,它强调了负面观念对结果和机构战略的影响。对政策制定者、利益相关者和公众的启示这项研究对各教育部门都有启示:从业人员可以从中汲取管理大班的经验。政策制定者可以利用这项研究,为制定有关班级规模规定和资源分配的政策提供信息,确保高等院校获得必要的支持,以应对大班额带来的挑战。促使研究人员研究有关班级规模的看法。资助者可以支持有关班级规模认知的研究,从而有助于循证决策和资源分配。最后,提高公众对班级规模动态的复杂性的认识,促进公众更广泛地了解教育工作者和教育机构在大班环境下提供优质教育所面临的挑战,也会使公众从中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Review of Education
Review of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
63
期刊最新文献
The status of culturally relevant teacher education in the European context: A systematic review of research Effectiveness of language‐sensitive subject teaching: Heterogeneity and quality of the evidence and implications for future research Evaluation of the effectiveness of critical thinking training on critical thinking skills and academic achievement by using mixed‐meta method Research on teachers of colour and minoritised teachers in majoritarian education systems: A scoping review of the literature in the last two decades Generative AI in education and research: A systematic mapping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1