Behaviour of Braced and Unbraced Multi-storey Steel Framed Buildings on Flat and Sloping Terrain

IF 1.1 4区 工程技术 Q3 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY International Journal of Steel Structures Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1007/s13296-024-00866-z
Palash Dey, Sylvia Wahengbam, Ainal Hoque Gazi
{"title":"Behaviour of Braced and Unbraced Multi-storey Steel Framed Buildings on Flat and Sloping Terrain","authors":"Palash Dey, Sylvia Wahengbam, Ainal Hoque Gazi","doi":"10.1007/s13296-024-00866-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In recent days, emerging nations have needed new and enhanced infrastructure projects to support their growing populations. There is a daily rise in the demand for residential land as the population expands. In addition to flat land, sloping land in hilly areas must be considered to satisfy the demand for housing land. Moreover, vertical development in the form of multi-storey buildings is the only solution to the problem. In this context the effects of various forms of bracing on the seismic performance of two hill building configurations, such as stepback and stepback-setback, were investigated and compared to a building standing on level ground. A time history dynamic analysis was performed to assess structural responses in terms of seismic parameters such as fundamental time period, top storey lateral displacement, storey drift, base shear, and torsion. The building standing on leveled and sloping ground have been modelled with bracings placed at three different locations, namely at the corners, the mid-edge, and the centre of the building. Buildings standing on sloping land are found to be extremely vulnerable to earthquakes due to irregularities in elevation. X-braced frames, V braced frames, and inverted V braced frames have all been examined in order to identify the best bracing system that significantly improved the seismic resilience of building frames. The Stepback-setback X-braced frame, positioned at the center of the building model, demonstrated the highest percentage decrease in lateral displacement compared to the control model during the El Centro earthquake: 16.27% along and 15.55% across the slope line, respectively. Similar trends were observed for the Northridge and Loma Prieta earthquakes. This highlights the effectiveness of the setback-stepback model with a centrally placed X-bracing system as the preferred choice for buildings on sloping ground due to its superior seismic resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":596,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Steel Structures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Steel Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-024-00866-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent days, emerging nations have needed new and enhanced infrastructure projects to support their growing populations. There is a daily rise in the demand for residential land as the population expands. In addition to flat land, sloping land in hilly areas must be considered to satisfy the demand for housing land. Moreover, vertical development in the form of multi-storey buildings is the only solution to the problem. In this context the effects of various forms of bracing on the seismic performance of two hill building configurations, such as stepback and stepback-setback, were investigated and compared to a building standing on level ground. A time history dynamic analysis was performed to assess structural responses in terms of seismic parameters such as fundamental time period, top storey lateral displacement, storey drift, base shear, and torsion. The building standing on leveled and sloping ground have been modelled with bracings placed at three different locations, namely at the corners, the mid-edge, and the centre of the building. Buildings standing on sloping land are found to be extremely vulnerable to earthquakes due to irregularities in elevation. X-braced frames, V braced frames, and inverted V braced frames have all been examined in order to identify the best bracing system that significantly improved the seismic resilience of building frames. The Stepback-setback X-braced frame, positioned at the center of the building model, demonstrated the highest percentage decrease in lateral displacement compared to the control model during the El Centro earthquake: 16.27% along and 15.55% across the slope line, respectively. Similar trends were observed for the Northridge and Loma Prieta earthquakes. This highlights the effectiveness of the setback-stepback model with a centrally placed X-bracing system as the preferred choice for buildings on sloping ground due to its superior seismic resilience.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
平地和坡地上有支撑和无支撑多层钢结构建筑的行为
近年来,新兴国家需要新建和扩建基础设施项目,以支持其不断增长的人口。随着人口的增长,对住宅用地的需求也与日俱增。除了平地,还必须考虑丘陵地区的坡地,以满足对住宅用地的需求。此外,多层建筑形式的垂直发展是解决问题的唯一办法。在这种情况下,研究了各种形式的支撑对两种山地建筑结构(如后退式和后退-后退式)抗震性能的影响,并与平地建筑进行了比较。进行了时间历程动态分析,以评估地震参数方面的结构响应,如基本时间周期、顶层侧向位移、层间漂移、基底剪力和扭转。对平地和坡地上的建筑物进行了建模,并在三个不同位置(即建筑物的四角、中间边缘和中心)设置了支撑。由于标高不规则,位于坡地上的建筑物极易受到地震的影响。我们对 X 型支撑框架、V 型支撑框架和倒 V 型支撑框架进行了研究,以找出能显著提高建筑框架抗震能力的最佳支撑系统。在埃尔森特罗地震中,位于建筑模型中心的后退-后置 X 支撑框架与对照模型相比,侧向位移减少的百分比最高:沿斜坡线和跨斜坡线分别减少 16.27% 和 15.55%。在北岭和洛马普列塔地震中也观察到了类似的趋势。这凸显了后退-后退模型的有效性,该模型采用中心放置的 X 支撑系统,具有卓越的抗震能力,是坡地建筑的首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Steel Structures
International Journal of Steel Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
122
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Steel Structures provides an international forum for a broad classification of technical papers in steel structural research and its applications. The journal aims to reach not only researchers, but also practicing engineers. Coverage encompasses such topics as stability, fatigue, non-linear behavior, dynamics, reliability, fire, design codes, computer-aided analysis and design, optimization, expert systems, connections, fabrications, maintenance, bridges, off-shore structures, jetties, stadiums, transmission towers, marine vessels, storage tanks, pressure vessels, aerospace, and pipelines and more.
期刊最新文献
Global Response Reconstruction of a Full-Scale 3D Structure Model Using Limited Multi-Response Data Stress Concentration Around Cutouts in Spirally Welded Steel Columns Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Welding Parameters on Material Properties of SS 316L Stainless Steel Welded Joints Experimental and Analytical Study on the Seismic Performance of PEC T-Shaped Columns Assembled Frames with ALC Open-Hole Wall A Parametric Investigation on Ultra-low Cycle Fatigue Damage of Steel Bridge Piers Under Horizontal Bi-directional Seismic Excitations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1