Social Innovation and the Financial Risk of EMNCs - The Contingent Role of Institutional Legitimacy

IF 3.9 3区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Management International Review Pub Date : 2024-05-29 DOI:10.1007/s11575-024-00545-5
Hasanul Banna, Md Imtiaz Mostafiz, Farhad Uddin Ahmed, Shlomo Y. Tarba
{"title":"Social Innovation and the Financial Risk of EMNCs - The Contingent Role of Institutional Legitimacy","authors":"Hasanul Banna, Md Imtiaz Mostafiz, Farhad Uddin Ahmed, Shlomo Y. Tarba","doi":"10.1007/s11575-024-00545-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper examines the influence of social innovation on financial risk of emerging economy multinational corporations (EMNCs). Traditionally, research has focussed on Western MNCs’ and their financial performance implications. However, the growing involvement of EMNCs in social innovation—albeit in environments characterized by institutional voids—and its effects on financial risk necessitate an in-depth examination. Drawing on <i>stakeholder theory</i>, we explored how EMNCs balance their social innovation initiatives with financial risks. To this end, we first examine how social innovation reduces the financial risk of EMNCs. Second, we examine the association between <i>excessive social innovation</i> and EMNCs’ financial risk. In addition, borrowing insights from institutional theory, we assess the role played by institutional legitimacy in this process, acknowledging institutional legitimacy’s potential to mitigate the financial risks associated with social innovation in emerging economies. We test our hypotheses based on data drawn from 90 EMNCs in 14 emerging economies, applying a panel regression model with robust standard errors and a rigorous robustness propensity score matching test. Our findings show that social innovation reduces EMNC financial risk, and challenge the assertions made regarding the potential negative implications of excessive social innovation on financial risk. Our results also demonstrate the intricate moderating effects of institutional legitimacy in balancing social innovation, excessive social innovation, and EMNC financial risk. Finally, we proffer critical implications for managers and policymakers in emerging economies.</p>","PeriodicalId":51434,"journal":{"name":"Management International Review","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management International Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-024-00545-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the influence of social innovation on financial risk of emerging economy multinational corporations (EMNCs). Traditionally, research has focussed on Western MNCs’ and their financial performance implications. However, the growing involvement of EMNCs in social innovation—albeit in environments characterized by institutional voids—and its effects on financial risk necessitate an in-depth examination. Drawing on stakeholder theory, we explored how EMNCs balance their social innovation initiatives with financial risks. To this end, we first examine how social innovation reduces the financial risk of EMNCs. Second, we examine the association between excessive social innovation and EMNCs’ financial risk. In addition, borrowing insights from institutional theory, we assess the role played by institutional legitimacy in this process, acknowledging institutional legitimacy’s potential to mitigate the financial risks associated with social innovation in emerging economies. We test our hypotheses based on data drawn from 90 EMNCs in 14 emerging economies, applying a panel regression model with robust standard errors and a rigorous robustness propensity score matching test. Our findings show that social innovation reduces EMNC financial risk, and challenge the assertions made regarding the potential negative implications of excessive social innovation on financial risk. Our results also demonstrate the intricate moderating effects of institutional legitimacy in balancing social innovation, excessive social innovation, and EMNC financial risk. Finally, we proffer critical implications for managers and policymakers in emerging economies.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会创新与新兴市场跨国公司的金融风险--制度合法性的权变作用
本文探讨了社会创新对新兴经济体跨国公司财务风险的影响。传统上,研究的重点是西方跨国公司及其财务业绩的影响。然而,新兴经济跨国公司越来越多地参与社会创新--尽管是在以制度空白为特征的环境中--及其对财务风险的影响需要进行深入研究。借鉴利益相关者理论,我们探讨了新兴市场跨国公司如何平衡其社会创新举措与财务风险。为此,我们首先研究了社会创新如何降低新兴市场跨国公司的财务风险。其次,我们研究了过度社会创新与新兴市场跨国公司财务风险之间的关联。此外,借鉴制度理论的见解,我们评估了制度合法性在这一过程中发挥的作用,承认制度合法性在降低新兴经济体社会创新相关财务风险方面的潜力。我们以 14 个新兴经济体中 90 家新兴市场跨国公司的数据为基础,运用带稳健标准误差的面板回归模型和严格的稳健性倾向得分匹配测试,检验了我们的假设。我们的研究结果表明,社会创新降低了新兴市场跨国公司的财务风险,并对有关过度社会创新可能对财务风险产生负面影响的论断提出了质疑。我们的研究结果还表明,在平衡社会创新、过度社会创新和跨国公司财务风险方面,制度合法性具有错综复杂的调节作用。最后,我们提出了对新兴经济体管理者和决策者的重要启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
11.60%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Management International Review publishes research-based articles that reflect significant advances in the key areas of International Management. Its target audience consists of scholars in International Business Administration. Management International Review is a double-blind refereed journal that aims at the advancement and dissemination of research in the fields of International Management. The scope of the journal comprises International Business, Cross-Cultural Management, and Comparative Management. The journal publishes research that builds or extends International Management theory so that it can contribute to International Management practice. Management International Review welcomes both theoretical and empirical work. Original papers are invited that are based on a solid theoretical basis and a rigorous methodology. In the area of empirical studies, the journal publishes both quantitative and qualitative research. To be published in Management International Review, a paper must make strong contributions and highlight the significance of those contributions to the field of International Management. The editors are especially interested in manuscripts that break new ground rather than papers that make only incremental contributions. Management International Review publishes articles and research notes. Every year, six issues are published. On average, two of these issues are Focused Issues, which concentrate on a specific subfield of International Management.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Strategic Orientations on the Born Globals’ Export Performance: An Ambidexterity Approach Strangers in a Strange Land: Legitimacy Formation by Polish Multinationals Venturing into Sub-Saharan Africa Market or Community? An Institutional Logics Interpretation of how MNE Subsidiaries Respond to Mandated Social Innovation in India MNCs’ Corporate Social Innovation in Emerging Markets: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Boundary Conditions Social Innovation and the Financial Risk of EMNCs - The Contingent Role of Institutional Legitimacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1