{"title":"Weak Z-structures for some combinatorial group constructions","authors":"M. Cárdenas, F.F. Lasheras, A. Quintero","doi":"10.1016/j.jpaa.2024.107761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Bestvina <span>[1]</span> introduced the notion of a (weak) <span><math><mi>Z</mi></math></span>-structure and (weak) <span><math><mi>Z</mi></math></span>-boundary for a torsion-free group, motivated by the notion of boundary for hyperbolic and <span><math><mi>C</mi><mi>A</mi><mi>T</mi><mo>(</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>)</mo></math></span> groups. Since then, some classes of groups have been shown to admit a (weak) <span><math><mi>Z</mi></math></span>-structure (see <span>[5]</span>, <span>[20]</span>, <span>[22]</span> for example); in fact, in all cases these groups are semistable at infinity and happen to have a pro-(finitely generated free) fundamental pro-group. The question whether or not every type <span><math><mi>F</mi></math></span> group admits such a structure remains open. In <span>[33]</span> it was shown that the property of admitting such a structure is closed under direct products and free products. Our main results are as follows.</p><p>THEOREM: Let <em>G</em> be a torsion-free and semistable at infinity finitely presented group with a pro-(finitely generated free) fundamental pro-group at each end. If <em>G</em> has a finite graph of groups decomposition in which all the groups involved are of type <span><math><mi>F</mi></math></span> and inward tame (in particular, if they all admit a weak <span><math><mi>Z</mi></math></span>-structure) then <em>G</em> admits a weak <span><math><mi>Z</mi></math></span>-structure.</p><p>COROLLARY: The class of those 1-ended and semistable at infinity torsion-free finitely presented groups which admit a weak <span><math><mi>Z</mi></math></span>-structure and have a pro-(finitely generated free) fundamental pro-group is closed under amalgamated products (resp. HNN-extensions) over finitely generated free groups.</p><p>On the other hand, given a finitely presented group <em>G</em> and a monomorphism <span><math><mi>φ</mi><mo>:</mo><mi>G</mi><mo>⟶</mo><mi>G</mi></math></span>, we may consider the ascending HNN-extension <span><math><mi>G</mi><msub><mrow><mo>⁎</mo></mrow><mrow><mi>φ</mi></mrow></msub><mo>=</mo><mo>〈</mo><mi>G</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>t</mi><mspace></mspace><mo>;</mo><mspace></mspace><msup><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msup><mi>g</mi><mi>t</mi><mo>=</mo><mi>φ</mi><mo>(</mo><mi>g</mi><mo>)</mo><mo>,</mo><mi>g</mi><mo>∈</mo><mi>G</mi><mo>〉</mo></math></span>. The results in <span>[26]</span> together with the Theorem above yield the following:</p><p>PROPOSITION: If a finitely presented torsion-free group <em>G</em> is of type <span><math><mi>F</mi></math></span> and inward tame, then any (1-ended) ascending HNN-extension <span><math><mi>G</mi><msub><mrow><mo>⁎</mo></mrow><mrow><mi>φ</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> admits a weak <span><math><mi>Z</mi></math></span>-structure.</p><p>In the particular case <span><math><mi>φ</mi><mo>∈</mo><mi>A</mi><mi>u</mi><mi>t</mi><mo>(</mo><mi>G</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span>, this ascending HNN-extension corresponds to a semidirect product <span><math><mi>G</mi><msub><mrow><mo>⋊</mo></mrow><mrow><mi>φ</mi></mrow></msub><mi>Z</mi></math></span>, and it has been shown in <span>[18]</span> that if <em>G</em> admits a <span><math><mi>Z</mi></math></span>-structure then so does <span><math><mi>G</mi><msub><mrow><mo>⋊</mo></mrow><mrow><mi>φ</mi></mrow></msub><mi>Z</mi></math></span>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022404924001580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Bestvina [1] introduced the notion of a (weak) -structure and (weak) -boundary for a torsion-free group, motivated by the notion of boundary for hyperbolic and groups. Since then, some classes of groups have been shown to admit a (weak) -structure (see [5], [20], [22] for example); in fact, in all cases these groups are semistable at infinity and happen to have a pro-(finitely generated free) fundamental pro-group. The question whether or not every type group admits such a structure remains open. In [33] it was shown that the property of admitting such a structure is closed under direct products and free products. Our main results are as follows.
THEOREM: Let G be a torsion-free and semistable at infinity finitely presented group with a pro-(finitely generated free) fundamental pro-group at each end. If G has a finite graph of groups decomposition in which all the groups involved are of type and inward tame (in particular, if they all admit a weak -structure) then G admits a weak -structure.
COROLLARY: The class of those 1-ended and semistable at infinity torsion-free finitely presented groups which admit a weak -structure and have a pro-(finitely generated free) fundamental pro-group is closed under amalgamated products (resp. HNN-extensions) over finitely generated free groups.
On the other hand, given a finitely presented group G and a monomorphism , we may consider the ascending HNN-extension . The results in [26] together with the Theorem above yield the following:
PROPOSITION: If a finitely presented torsion-free group G is of type and inward tame, then any (1-ended) ascending HNN-extension admits a weak -structure.
In the particular case , this ascending HNN-extension corresponds to a semidirect product , and it has been shown in [18] that if G admits a -structure then so does .