Beyond sarcopenia: frailty in chronic haemodialysis patients

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Clinical Kidney Journal Pub Date : 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1093/ckj/sfae069
Jean-Sébastien Souweine, Grégoire Pasquier, Marion Morena, Laure Patrier, Annie Rodriguez, Nathalie Raynal, Isabelle Ohresser, Racim Benomar, Maurice Hayot, Jacques Mercier, Farès Gouzi, Jean-Paul Cristol
{"title":"Beyond sarcopenia: frailty in chronic haemodialysis patients","authors":"Jean-Sébastien Souweine, Grégoire Pasquier, Marion Morena, Laure Patrier, Annie Rodriguez, Nathalie Raynal, Isabelle Ohresser, Racim Benomar, Maurice Hayot, Jacques Mercier, Farès Gouzi, Jean-Paul Cristol","doi":"10.1093/ckj/sfae069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Frailty, characterized by vulnerability, reduced reserves, and increased susceptibility to severe events, is a significant concern in chronic hemodialysis (CHD) patients. Sarcopenia, corresponding to the progressive loss of muscle mass and strength, may contribute to frailty by reducing functional capacity, mobility, and autonomy. However, consensus lacks on optimal frailty bedside index for CHD patients. This study investigated the influence of frailty on CHD patient survival and explored the associated factors. Methods One hundred and thirty-five patients were enrolled from January to April 2019 and then followed up prospectively until April 2022. At inclusion, frailty was assessed by Timed Up and Go (TUG) and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) tests including gait speed, standing balance and lower limb muscle strength. Results From a total of 114 prevalent CHD patients [66% men, age 67.6+/−15.1 years], 30 died during the follow-up period of 23.7 (16.8–34.3) months. Deceased patients were older, had more comorbidities and a higher sarcopenia prevalence (P < 0.05). The TUG test and SPPB scores were significantly reduced in deceased patients [SPPB Total score: 7.2+/−3.3 vs 9.4+/−2.5; TUG time (8.7+/−5.8 vs 13.8+/−10.5 (P < 0.05)]. Multivariate analysis showed that a higher SPPB score (total value > 9) was associated with a lower mortality risk (HR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.74–0.92; P < 0.03). Each component of the SPPB test was also associated with mortality in univariate analysis but only the SPPB balance test remained protective against mortality in multivariate analysis. Higher age, lower handgrip strength and lower protein catabolic rate were associated with SPPB total scores < 9, SPPB balance score and TUG time >10 sec. Conclusions Screening for frailty is crucial in CHD patients, and incorporating SPPB, especially the balance test, provides valuable insights. Diminished muscle strength and inadequate protein intake negatively influence SPPB score and balance in CHD patients. An effective identification and management of frailty can therefore improve outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03845452.","PeriodicalId":10435,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Kidney Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Kidney Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfae069","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Frailty, characterized by vulnerability, reduced reserves, and increased susceptibility to severe events, is a significant concern in chronic hemodialysis (CHD) patients. Sarcopenia, corresponding to the progressive loss of muscle mass and strength, may contribute to frailty by reducing functional capacity, mobility, and autonomy. However, consensus lacks on optimal frailty bedside index for CHD patients. This study investigated the influence of frailty on CHD patient survival and explored the associated factors. Methods One hundred and thirty-five patients were enrolled from January to April 2019 and then followed up prospectively until April 2022. At inclusion, frailty was assessed by Timed Up and Go (TUG) and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) tests including gait speed, standing balance and lower limb muscle strength. Results From a total of 114 prevalent CHD patients [66% men, age 67.6+/−15.1 years], 30 died during the follow-up period of 23.7 (16.8–34.3) months. Deceased patients were older, had more comorbidities and a higher sarcopenia prevalence (P < 0.05). The TUG test and SPPB scores were significantly reduced in deceased patients [SPPB Total score: 7.2+/−3.3 vs 9.4+/−2.5; TUG time (8.7+/−5.8 vs 13.8+/−10.5 (P < 0.05)]. Multivariate analysis showed that a higher SPPB score (total value > 9) was associated with a lower mortality risk (HR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.74–0.92; P < 0.03). Each component of the SPPB test was also associated with mortality in univariate analysis but only the SPPB balance test remained protective against mortality in multivariate analysis. Higher age, lower handgrip strength and lower protein catabolic rate were associated with SPPB total scores < 9, SPPB balance score and TUG time >10 sec. Conclusions Screening for frailty is crucial in CHD patients, and incorporating SPPB, especially the balance test, provides valuable insights. Diminished muscle strength and inadequate protein intake negatively influence SPPB score and balance in CHD patients. An effective identification and management of frailty can therefore improve outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03845452.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越 "肌肉疏松症":慢性血液透析患者的脆弱性
背景虚弱是慢性血液透析(CHD)患者的一个重要问题,其特点是易受伤害、储备减少以及更容易发生严重事件。肌肉疏松症与肌肉质量和力量的逐渐丧失相对应,可通过降低功能能力、活动能力和自主性而导致虚弱。然而,人们对 CHD 患者的最佳虚弱床旁指数缺乏共识。本研究调查了虚弱对心脏病患者生存的影响,并探讨了相关因素。方法 135 名患者于 2019 年 1 月至 4 月入组,然后进行前瞻性随访至 2022 年 4 月。入组时,通过定时起立行走(TUG)和短期体能测试(SPPB)评估虚弱程度,包括步态速度、站立平衡和下肢肌力。结果 在总共 114 名冠心病患者(66% 为男性,年龄为 67.6+/-15.1 岁)中,有 30 人在 23.7(16.8-34.3)个月的随访期间死亡。死亡患者年龄较大,合并症较多,肌少症发病率较高(P< 0.05)。死亡患者的 TUG 测试和 SPPB 分数明显降低 [SPPB 总分:7.2+/-3.3 vs 9.4+/-2.5;TUG 时间(8.7+/-5.8 vs 13.8+/-10.5 (P &;lt; 0.05)]。多变量分析显示,SPPB得分越高(总分> 9),死亡风险越低(HR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.74-0.92; P < 0.03)。在单变量分析中,SPPB 测试的每个组成部分也与死亡率有关,但在多变量分析中,只有 SPPB 平衡测试对死亡率仍有保护作用。较高的年龄、较低的握力和较低的蛋白质分解代谢率与 SPPB 总分 < 9、SPPB 平衡得分和 TUG 时间 >10 秒相关。结论 对冠心病患者进行体弱筛查至关重要,结合 SPPB,尤其是平衡测试,可提供有价值的见解。肌力减弱和蛋白质摄入不足会对心脏疾病患者的 SPPB 评分和平衡能力产生负面影响。因此,有效识别和处理虚弱问题可改善预后。临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT03845452。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Kidney Journal
Clinical Kidney Journal Medicine-Transplantation
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: About the Journal Clinical Kidney Journal: Clinical and Translational Nephrology (ckj), an official journal of the ERA-EDTA (European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association), is a fully open access, online only journal publishing bimonthly. The journal is an essential educational and training resource integrating clinical, translational and educational research into clinical practice. ckj aims to contribute to a translational research culture among nephrologists and kidney pathologists that helps close the gap between basic researchers and practicing clinicians and promote sorely needed innovation in the Nephrology field. All research articles in this journal have undergone peer review.
期刊最新文献
Apolipoprotein B-48 and late graft failure in kidney transplant recipients Cerebral white matter injury in hemodialysis patients: a cross-sectional tract-based spatial statistics and fixel-based analysis Efficacy and safety of telitacicept, a BLyS/APRIL dual inhibitor, in the treatment of IgA nephropathy: a retrospective case-control study Basiliximab induction alone vs. a dual ATG-Basiliximab approach in first live-donor non-sensitized kidney transplant recipients with low HLA matching Ten tips to carry out video consultations in nephrology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1