Feasibility and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy with fundoplication in patients with achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.1 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Annals of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-14 DOI:10.20524/aog.2024.0890
Faisal Kamal, Muhammad Ali Khan, Wade Lee-Smith, Sachit Sharma, Ashu Acharya, Umer Farooq, Zahid Ejaz, Muhammad Aziz, Manesh Kumar Gangwani, Umar Hayat, Anand Kumar, Alexander Schlachterman, David Loren, Thomas Kowalski
{"title":"Feasibility and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy with fundoplication in patients with achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Faisal Kamal, Muhammad Ali Khan, Wade Lee-Smith, Sachit Sharma, Ashu Acharya, Umer Farooq, Zahid Ejaz, Muhammad Aziz, Manesh Kumar Gangwani, Umar Hayat, Anand Kumar, Alexander Schlachterman, David Loren, Thomas Kowalski","doi":"10.20524/aog.2024.0890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Achalasia can cause disabling symptoms that may substantially impair the quality of life. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has shown promising results in the management of achalasia. In this meta-analysis we have evaluated the feasibility and safety of single-session POEM with fundoplication (POEM+F) in patients with achalasia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed several databases from inception to July 08, 2022, to identify studies evaluating the feasibility and/or safety of single-session POEM+F for patients with achalasia. Our outcomes of interest included the technical success of POEM+F, adverse events, esophagitis and wrap integrity on follow-up upper endoscopy, total procedure time, and fundoplication time. Pooled rates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for outcomes were calculated using a random effect model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> statistic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 4 studies with 90 patients. Pooled rates (95%CI) of technical success and adverse events were 92% (83-96%) and 5% (2-11%), respectively. Pooled rates (95%CI) of esophagitis and wrap integrity on follow-up upper endoscopy were 18% (11-30%) and 85% (43-98%) respectively. Pooled mean procedure time and fundoplication time were 113.2 (98.7-127.6) and 55.3 (43.7-66.8) min, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis demonstrates the feasibility and safety of POEM+F in patients with achalasia. More studies with long-term follow up are required to further validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"37 4","pages":"403-409"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11226739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2024.0890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Achalasia can cause disabling symptoms that may substantially impair the quality of life. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has shown promising results in the management of achalasia. In this meta-analysis we have evaluated the feasibility and safety of single-session POEM with fundoplication (POEM+F) in patients with achalasia.

Methods: We reviewed several databases from inception to July 08, 2022, to identify studies evaluating the feasibility and/or safety of single-session POEM+F for patients with achalasia. Our outcomes of interest included the technical success of POEM+F, adverse events, esophagitis and wrap integrity on follow-up upper endoscopy, total procedure time, and fundoplication time. Pooled rates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for outcomes were calculated using a random effect model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I 2 statistic.

Results: We included 4 studies with 90 patients. Pooled rates (95%CI) of technical success and adverse events were 92% (83-96%) and 5% (2-11%), respectively. Pooled rates (95%CI) of esophagitis and wrap integrity on follow-up upper endoscopy were 18% (11-30%) and 85% (43-98%) respectively. Pooled mean procedure time and fundoplication time were 113.2 (98.7-127.6) and 55.3 (43.7-66.8) min, respectively.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrates the feasibility and safety of POEM+F in patients with achalasia. More studies with long-term follow up are required to further validate these findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贲门失弛缓症患者口腔内窥镜肌切开术加胃底折叠术的可行性和安全性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:贲门失弛缓症可引起致残性症状,严重影响生活质量。口周内镜下肌切开术(POEM)在治疗贲门失弛缓症方面取得了良好的效果。在这项荟萃分析中,我们评估了贲门失弛缓症患者单次口腔内镜肌切开术联合胃底折叠术(POEM+F)的可行性和安全性:我们查阅了从开始到2022年7月8日的多个数据库,以确定评估单次POEM+F治疗贲门失弛缓症患者的可行性和/或安全性的研究。我们关注的结果包括 POEM+F 的技术成功率、不良事件、随访上内镜检查中的食管炎和包裹完整性、总手术时间和胃底折叠术时间。采用随机效应模型计算了结果的汇总率和 95% 置信区间 (CI)。使用I 2统计量评估异质性:我们纳入了 4 项研究,共 90 名患者。技术成功率和不良事件的汇总率(95%CI)分别为 92% (83-96%) 和 5% (2-11%)。后续上内镜检查中食管炎和包裹完整性的汇总率(95%CI)分别为18%(11%-30%)和85%(43%-98%)。汇总的平均手术时间和胃底折叠术时间分别为113.2(98.7-127.6)分钟和55.3(43.7-66.8)分钟:这项荟萃分析证明了 POEM+F 在贲门失弛缓症患者中的可行性和安全性。要进一步验证这些研究结果,还需要更多的长期随访研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterology
Annals of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
期刊最新文献
Use of nailfold capillaroscopy for the early diagnosis of systemic sclerosis in patients with primary biliary cholangitis. Age of onset of inflammatory bowel disease is the strongest risk factor for the development of malignancy. All you need to know about the overlap between primary sclerosing cholangitis and inflammatory bowel disease. Early versus late drainage of pancreatic necrotic fluid collections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Effective endoscopic management of gastric neoplastic complications in patients with autoimmune gastritis: results of a monocentric study of 88 patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1