Diagnosis of giant cell arteritis by 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients on glucocorticoid therapy: importance of delayed imaging.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY Clinical and experimental rheumatology Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.55563/clinexprheumatol/db8p4e
Vicente Aldasoro, Vicky Betech-Antar, Santos Castañeda, Eugenio de Miguel, Juan José Rosales, María José García-Velloso
{"title":"Diagnosis of giant cell arteritis by 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients on glucocorticoid therapy: importance of delayed imaging.","authors":"Vicente Aldasoro, Vicky Betech-Antar, Santos Castañeda, Eugenio de Miguel, Juan José Rosales, María José García-Velloso","doi":"10.55563/clinexprheumatol/db8p4e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study is to analyse the diagnostic value of positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) despite glucocorticoid (GC) therapy before PET acquisition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients with strongly suspected GCA according to 2022 EULAR/ACR criteria were included. The physician diagnosis of GCA after 6 months of follow-up was the gold standard. PET was performed at baseline and 6 months later. In patients with negative results at 60 min, delayed imaging was performed at 180 min.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six patients were included with a median (IQR) age of 70.5 (57-88) years. Baseline PET was positive in all but one: 18 patients at 60 min and 7 patients after delayed imaging at 180 min. The median (IQR) GC dose at the time of baseline PET was 45 mg/d (26.2-45) of prednisone equivalent with a median exposure of 14 days (7-76.2). At 6 months of follow-up, PET was performed in 22 patients, with positive results in 16. Delayed imaging was performed in 6 patients due to negative PET at 60 min, with positive results in all cases, despite treatment with GC and/or biological therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients on GC therapy, delayed imaging protocols applying procedural recommendations for vascular quantification could improve diagnostic accuracy. Therefore, we suggest performing imaging only at 180 min in patients who have been on GCs for more than 3 days as well as in those with highly suspected GCA but negative findings in baseline PET at 60 min.</p>","PeriodicalId":10274,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/db8p4e","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to analyse the diagnostic value of positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) despite glucocorticoid (GC) therapy before PET acquisition.

Methods: Consecutive patients with strongly suspected GCA according to 2022 EULAR/ACR criteria were included. The physician diagnosis of GCA after 6 months of follow-up was the gold standard. PET was performed at baseline and 6 months later. In patients with negative results at 60 min, delayed imaging was performed at 180 min.

Results: Twenty-six patients were included with a median (IQR) age of 70.5 (57-88) years. Baseline PET was positive in all but one: 18 patients at 60 min and 7 patients after delayed imaging at 180 min. The median (IQR) GC dose at the time of baseline PET was 45 mg/d (26.2-45) of prednisone equivalent with a median exposure of 14 days (7-76.2). At 6 months of follow-up, PET was performed in 22 patients, with positive results in 16. Delayed imaging was performed in 6 patients due to negative PET at 60 min, with positive results in all cases, despite treatment with GC and/or biological therapy.

Conclusions: In patients on GC therapy, delayed imaging protocols applying procedural recommendations for vascular quantification could improve diagnostic accuracy. Therefore, we suggest performing imaging only at 180 min in patients who have been on GCs for more than 3 days as well as in those with highly suspected GCA but negative findings in baseline PET at 60 min.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糖皮质激素治疗患者的 18F-FDG PET/CT 巨细胞动脉炎诊断:延迟成像的重要性。
研究目的本研究旨在分析正电子发射断层扫描(PET)在巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)患者中的诊断价值,这些患者在 PET 采集前曾接受过糖皮质激素(GC)治疗:方法:根据 2022 年 EULAR/ACR 标准,连续纳入强烈怀疑为 GCA 的患者。随访6个月后医生诊断为GCA是金标准。在基线和6个月后进行PET检查。对于 60 分钟后结果为阴性的患者,则在 180 分钟后进行延迟成像:共纳入 26 名患者,中位(IQR)年龄为 70.5(57-88)岁。除一名患者外,其他患者的基线 PET 均为阳性:其中 18 名患者在 60 分钟时 PET 呈阳性,7 名患者在 180 分钟延迟成像后 PET 呈阳性。基线 PET 时的 GC 剂量中位数(IQR)为 45 毫克/天(26.2-45)泼尼松当量,中位暴露时间为 14 天(7-76.2)。随访 6 个月时,对 22 名患者进行了 PET 检测,其中 16 人检测结果呈阳性。6名患者因60分钟后PET呈阴性而进行了延迟成像,尽管接受了GC和/或生物治疗,但所有病例的结果均为阳性:结论:对于接受 GC 治疗的患者,延迟成像方案应用血管定量的程序建议可提高诊断准确性。因此,我们建议对服用 GC 超过 3 天的患者以及高度怀疑 GCA 但在 60 分钟时基线 PET 结果为阴性的患者仅在 180 分钟时进行成像。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
18.90%
发文量
377
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology is a bi-monthly international peer-reviewed journal which has been covering all clinical, experimental and translational aspects of musculoskeletal, arthritic and connective tissue diseases since 1983.
期刊最新文献
Markedly elevated serum IL-6 levels predict relapse within six months of treatment initiation in Still's disease. Clinical spectrum of small-vessel vasculitis related to cocaine consumption: data from an Italian cohort. Outcome measure in childhood Sjögren's disease: where do we stand? Biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis in a patient with ankylosing spondylitis: a rare coincidence of two diseases at different stages of life. A proposed clinical tool to identify high-risk patients for monogenic lupus: a pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1