Beyond the shot: Exploring secondary transfer of gunshot residue on common surfaces and the impact of hand cleaning methods

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL Forensic science international Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112135
Derya DEMİRCİOĞLU , Mahmut Şerif YILDIRIM , Emre ERKAN , Merve ÇAPACI , Ali Rıza TÜMER , Ramazan AKÇAN
{"title":"Beyond the shot: Exploring secondary transfer of gunshot residue on common surfaces and the impact of hand cleaning methods","authors":"Derya DEMİRCİOĞLU ,&nbsp;Mahmut Şerif YILDIRIM ,&nbsp;Emre ERKAN ,&nbsp;Merve ÇAPACI ,&nbsp;Ali Rıza TÜMER ,&nbsp;Ramazan AKÇAN","doi":"10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Understanding the presence, transfer dynamics and depletion of gunshot residues (GSR) on various surfaces is crucial for preserving evidence, reconstructing shooting incidents, and linking suspects to crime scenes. This study aims to explore the transfer and loss of GSR on commonly encountered surfaces such as ceramic, glass, metal, paper, and plastic, as well as the influence of different common hand cleaning methods on secondary transfer. Using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) combined with energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) and automated detection software, we quantified highly indicative three-component characteristic particles (lead, barium, and antimony) on cups made from ceramic, glass, metal, paper, and plastic. Furthermore, we evaluated the amount of secondary transferred particles on these surfaces following various post-discharge hand cleaning methods: washing with water and soap, washing with only water, wiping with wet wipes, or using paper towels.</p><p>The results demonstrate that counts of secondarily transferred GSR particles vary significantly among surfaces. Specifically, the transferred GSR count was highest on paper, followed by plastic, ceramic, metal, and glass respectively. Post-discharge hand cleaning methods, including washing with water and soap, washing with only water, cleaning with wet wipes, or with paper towel, resulted in substantial loss of GSR count on transferred surfaces. Among these methods, washing with water and soap showed the highest depletion. The empirical evidence provided by our results underscores the importance of considering surface properties, post-shooting activities, and the methods of sample collection and analysis when interpreting transferred GSR analysis. Despite challenges, these insights enhance our ability to link suspects to shooting crimes through careful consideration of the entire context.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12341,"journal":{"name":"Forensic science international","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic science international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073824002160","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the presence, transfer dynamics and depletion of gunshot residues (GSR) on various surfaces is crucial for preserving evidence, reconstructing shooting incidents, and linking suspects to crime scenes. This study aims to explore the transfer and loss of GSR on commonly encountered surfaces such as ceramic, glass, metal, paper, and plastic, as well as the influence of different common hand cleaning methods on secondary transfer. Using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) combined with energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) and automated detection software, we quantified highly indicative three-component characteristic particles (lead, barium, and antimony) on cups made from ceramic, glass, metal, paper, and plastic. Furthermore, we evaluated the amount of secondary transferred particles on these surfaces following various post-discharge hand cleaning methods: washing with water and soap, washing with only water, wiping with wet wipes, or using paper towels.

The results demonstrate that counts of secondarily transferred GSR particles vary significantly among surfaces. Specifically, the transferred GSR count was highest on paper, followed by plastic, ceramic, metal, and glass respectively. Post-discharge hand cleaning methods, including washing with water and soap, washing with only water, cleaning with wet wipes, or with paper towel, resulted in substantial loss of GSR count on transferred surfaces. Among these methods, washing with water and soap showed the highest depletion. The empirical evidence provided by our results underscores the importance of considering surface properties, post-shooting activities, and the methods of sample collection and analysis when interpreting transferred GSR analysis. Despite challenges, these insights enhance our ability to link suspects to shooting crimes through careful consideration of the entire context.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
枪声之外:探索枪弹残留物在普通表面的二次转移以及手部清洁方法的影响。
了解各种表面上枪击残留物(GSR)的存在、转移动态和损耗情况对于保存证据、重建枪击事件以及将犯罪嫌疑人与犯罪现场联系起来至关重要。本研究旨在探索枪弹残留物在陶瓷、玻璃、金属、纸张和塑料等常见表面上的转移和损耗情况,以及不同的常用手工清洁方法对二次转移的影响。我们使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)结合能量色散 X 射线分析(EDX)和自动检测软件,对陶瓷、玻璃、金属、纸张和塑料杯子上高度指示性的三组分特征颗粒(铅、钡和锑)进行了量化。此外,我们还评估了出院后采用各种手部清洁方法(用水和肥皂清洗、仅用水清洗、用湿纸巾擦拭或使用纸巾)后这些表面上二次转移颗粒的数量。结果表明,不同表面上二次转移的 GSR 粒子计数差异很大。具体来说,转移的 GSR 计数在纸张上最高,其次分别是塑料、陶瓷、金属和玻璃。出院后的手部清洁方法,包括用水和肥皂清洗、只用水清洗、用湿纸巾或纸巾清洁,都会导致转移表面的 GSR 计数大量减少。在这些方法中,用水和肥皂清洗的损失最大。我们的研究结果提供的经验证据强调了在解释转移的 GSR 分析时考虑表面特性、拍摄后的活动以及样本采集和分析方法的重要性。尽管存在挑战,但这些见解提高了我们通过仔细考虑整个背景将犯罪嫌疑人与枪击犯罪联系起来的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forensic science international
Forensic science international 医学-医学:法
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Forensic Science International is the flagship journal in the prestigious Forensic Science International family, publishing the most innovative, cutting-edge, and influential contributions across the forensic sciences. Fields include: forensic pathology and histochemistry, chemistry, biochemistry and toxicology, biology, serology, odontology, psychiatry, anthropology, digital forensics, the physical sciences, firearms, and document examination, as well as investigations of value to public health in its broadest sense, and the important marginal area where science and medicine interact with the law. The journal publishes: Case Reports Commentaries Letters to the Editor Original Research Papers (Regular Papers) Rapid Communications Review Articles Technical Notes.
期刊最新文献
Sensitivity assessment of the modified ABAcard® HemaTrace® and p30 immunochromatographic test cards Degradation and preservation of nitrites in whole blood Post mortem chiral analysis of MDMA and MDA in human blood and hair The 2 stages of cartridge primer toolmark production and the implied impact of cartridge manufacturing tolerances Letter to Editor regarding article “Ok Google, Start a Fire. IoT devices as witnesses and actors in fire investigations”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1