Entecavir vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B patients with severe acute exacerbation.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1097/MEG.0000000000002709
Chih-Yang Lin, Wei-Chih Sun, Chia-Ming Lu, Wen-Chi Chen, Feng-Woei Tsay, Tzun-Jiun Tsai, Feng-Yu Kuo, Wei-Lun Tsai
{"title":"Entecavir vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B patients with severe acute exacerbation.","authors":"Chih-Yang Lin, Wei-Chih Sun, Chia-Ming Lu, Wen-Chi Chen, Feng-Woei Tsay, Tzun-Jiun Tsai, Feng-Yu Kuo, Wei-Lun Tsai","doi":"10.1097/MEG.0000000000002709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy of different nucleos(t)ide analogs in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (CHB) with severe acute exacerbation (SAE) remained unclear. Thus, this study aimed to compare the short-term efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and entecavir (ETV) in patients having CHB with SAE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed consecutive patients with treatment-naive CHB receiving TDF (n = 36) or ETV (n = 65) for SAE. The primary endpoint was overall mortality or receipt of liver transplantation (LT) by 24 weeks. The secondary endpoints are the comparison of ETV vs. TDF influences on renal function and virological and biochemical responses at 4, 12, 24, and 48 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. By 24 weeks, 8 (22%) patients in the TDF group and 10 (15%) patients in the ETV group had either died (n = 15) or received LT (n = 3) ( P  = 0.367). Cox-regression multivariate analysis revealed age ( P  = 0.003), baseline international normalized ratio of prothrombin time ( P  = 0.024), and early presence of hepatic encephalopathy ( P  = 0.003) as independent factors associated with mortality or LT. The two groups of patients achieved comparable biochemical and virological responses at 48 weeks. No significant difference was found in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between the TDF and the ETV groups. However, a significant reduction in the eGFR at 48 weeks, as compared with the baseline, was found in each group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TDF and ETV achieved similar short-term clinical outcomes and treatment responses in CHB patients with SAE.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000002709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of different nucleos(t)ide analogs in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (CHB) with severe acute exacerbation (SAE) remained unclear. Thus, this study aimed to compare the short-term efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and entecavir (ETV) in patients having CHB with SAE.

Methods: We analyzed consecutive patients with treatment-naive CHB receiving TDF (n = 36) or ETV (n = 65) for SAE. The primary endpoint was overall mortality or receipt of liver transplantation (LT) by 24 weeks. The secondary endpoints are the comparison of ETV vs. TDF influences on renal function and virological and biochemical responses at 4, 12, 24, and 48 weeks.

Results: The baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. By 24 weeks, 8 (22%) patients in the TDF group and 10 (15%) patients in the ETV group had either died (n = 15) or received LT (n = 3) ( P  = 0.367). Cox-regression multivariate analysis revealed age ( P  = 0.003), baseline international normalized ratio of prothrombin time ( P  = 0.024), and early presence of hepatic encephalopathy ( P  = 0.003) as independent factors associated with mortality or LT. The two groups of patients achieved comparable biochemical and virological responses at 48 weeks. No significant difference was found in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between the TDF and the ETV groups. However, a significant reduction in the eGFR at 48 weeks, as compared with the baseline, was found in each group.

Conclusion: TDF and ETV achieved similar short-term clinical outcomes and treatment responses in CHB patients with SAE.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
恩替卡韦与富马酸替诺福韦酯在治疗严重急性恶化的慢性乙型肝炎患者中的对比。
背景:不同核苷(t)ide类似物治疗伴有严重急性加重(SAE)的慢性乙型肝炎病毒(CHB)的疗效仍不明确。因此,本研究旨在比较富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯(TDF)和恩替卡韦(ETV)对伴有 SAE 的 CHB 患者的短期疗效:我们分析了连续接受TDF(36例)或ETV(65例)治疗的SAE裸眼CHB患者。主要终点是24周内的总死亡率或接受肝移植(LT)的情况。次要终点是比较 ETV 与 TDF 对肾功能的影响以及 4、12、24 和 48 周的病毒学和生化反应:结果:两组的基线特征相当。到24周时,TDF组有8名(22%)患者死亡(n = 15)或接受LT治疗(n = 3),ETV组有10名(15%)患者死亡(P = 0.367)。Cox回归多变量分析显示,年龄(P = 0.003)、凝血酶原时间基线国际标准化比率(P = 0.024)和早期肝性脑病(P = 0.003)是与死亡或LT相关的独立因素。两组患者在 48 周时的生化反应和病毒学反应相当。TDF组和ETV组的估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)无明显差异。然而,与基线相比,每组患者在 48 周时的 eGFR 都有明显下降:结论:TDF和ETV对患有SAE的慢性乙型肝炎患者的短期临床疗效和治疗反应相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1