Deformity correction from the convexity of the curve in neuromuscular scoliosis.

Q1 Medicine Journal of spine surgery Pub Date : 2024-06-21 Epub Date: 2024-05-09 DOI:10.21037/jss-23-128
José María Hernández Mateo, Jaime Flores Gallardo, Oscar Riquelme García, Azucena García Martín, Cristina Igualada Blázquez, María Coro Solans López, Laura Muñoz Núñez, Luis Alejandro Esparragoza Cabrera
{"title":"Deformity correction from the convexity of the curve in neuromuscular scoliosis.","authors":"José María Hernández Mateo, Jaime Flores Gallardo, Oscar Riquelme García, Azucena García Martín, Cristina Igualada Blázquez, María Coro Solans López, Laura Muñoz Núñez, Luis Alejandro Esparragoza Cabrera","doi":"10.21037/jss-23-128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>\"Convex Pedicle Screw Technique\" reduces the theoretical risk of neurovascular injury. Our aim is to evaluate the efficacy of this technique in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective study of 12 patients who underwent a Convex Pedicle Screw Technique and were diagnosed with NMS. Patients who had undergone previous spinal surgery were excluded. The minimum follow-up required was 24 months. Demographic data, intraoperative data, neurovascular complications and neurophysiological events requiring implant repositioning, as well as pre- and postoperative radiological variables were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve patients diagnosed with NMS underwent surgery. The median operative time was 217 minutes. Mean blood loss was 3.8±1.1 g/dL hemoglobin (Hb). The median postoperative stay was 8.8±4 days. A reduction of the Cobb angle in primary curve of 49.1% (from 52.8°±18° to 26.5°±12.6°; P<0.001) and in secondary curve of 25.2% (from 27.8°±18.9° to 18.3°±13.3°; P=0.10) was achieved. Coronal balance improved by 69.4% (7.5±46.2 <i>vs.</i> 2.3±20.9 mm; P=0.72) and sagittal balance by 75% (from -14.1±71.8 <i>vs.</i> -3.5±48.6 mm; P=0.50). There were no neurovascular complications. There were no intraoperative neurophysiological events requiring implant repositioning, nor during reduction maneuvers. No infections were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The correction of the deformity from convexity in NMS achieves similar results to other techniques, and a very low complication rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"10 2","pages":"224-231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11224787/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-23-128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: "Convex Pedicle Screw Technique" reduces the theoretical risk of neurovascular injury. Our aim is to evaluate the efficacy of this technique in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS).

Methods: Retrospective study of 12 patients who underwent a Convex Pedicle Screw Technique and were diagnosed with NMS. Patients who had undergone previous spinal surgery were excluded. The minimum follow-up required was 24 months. Demographic data, intraoperative data, neurovascular complications and neurophysiological events requiring implant repositioning, as well as pre- and postoperative radiological variables were collected.

Results: Twelve patients diagnosed with NMS underwent surgery. The median operative time was 217 minutes. Mean blood loss was 3.8±1.1 g/dL hemoglobin (Hb). The median postoperative stay was 8.8±4 days. A reduction of the Cobb angle in primary curve of 49.1% (from 52.8°±18° to 26.5°±12.6°; P<0.001) and in secondary curve of 25.2% (from 27.8°±18.9° to 18.3°±13.3°; P=0.10) was achieved. Coronal balance improved by 69.4% (7.5±46.2 vs. 2.3±20.9 mm; P=0.72) and sagittal balance by 75% (from -14.1±71.8 vs. -3.5±48.6 mm; P=0.50). There were no neurovascular complications. There were no intraoperative neurophysiological events requiring implant repositioning, nor during reduction maneuvers. No infections were reported.

Conclusions: The correction of the deformity from convexity in NMS achieves similar results to other techniques, and a very low complication rate.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经肌肉性脊柱侧凸的曲线畸形矫正。
背景介绍"凸面椎弓根螺钉技术 "可降低神经血管损伤的理论风险。我们的目的是评估该技术对神经肌肉性脊柱侧凸(NMS)患者的疗效:方法:对 12 名接受凸面椎弓根螺钉技术并被诊断为 NMS 的患者进行回顾性研究。之前接受过脊柱手术的患者被排除在外。最短随访时间为 24 个月。研究人员收集了患者的人口统计学数据、术中数据、神经血管并发症、需要重新定位植入物的神经电生理事件以及术前和术后的放射学变量:12名确诊为NMS的患者接受了手术。中位手术时间为 217 分钟。平均失血量为 3.8±1.1 g/dL 血红蛋白(Hb)。术后中位住院时间为 8.8±4 天。主要曲线的Cobb角缩小了49.1%(从52.8°±18°缩小到26.5°±12.6°;Pvs.无神经血管并发症。术中没有发生需要重新定位植入物的神经生理事件,在缩小操作过程中也没有发生神经生理事件。无感染报告:结论:NMS凸畸形的矫正效果与其他技术相似,并发症发生率极低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of spine surgery
Journal of spine surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
A comparative cadaveric biomechanical study of bilateral FacetFuse® transfacet pedicle screws versus bilateral or unilateral pedicle screw-rod construct. Advancing the design of interspinous fixation devices for improved biomechanical performance: dual vs. single-locking set screw mechanisms and symmetrical vs. asymmetrical plate designs. Best practices guidelines in the postoperative management of patients who underwent cervical and lumbar fusions. Blood loss during three column osteotomies: influence on outcomes and mitigation strategies. Bone graft substitutes used in anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a contemporary systematic review of fusion rates and complications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1