Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Osteoporotic Agents across CKD Stages: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Kidney & blood pressure research Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1159/000540235
Tahereh Sabaghian, Parisa Delkash, Maryam Rahmannia, Amir Hashem Shahidi Bonjar, Rosella Centis, Lia D'Ambrosio, Giovanni Sotgiu, Mohammad Javad Nasiri, Giovanni Battista Migliori
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Osteoporotic Agents across CKD Stages: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.","authors":"Tahereh Sabaghian, Parisa Delkash, Maryam Rahmannia, Amir Hashem Shahidi Bonjar, Rosella Centis, Lia D'Ambrosio, Giovanni Sotgiu, Mohammad Javad Nasiri, Giovanni Battista Migliori","doi":"10.1159/000540235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Osteoporosis poses a significant health concern, especially for individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD). CKD disrupts mineral and bone metabolism, heightening the risk of fractures and complicating the management of osteoporosis. While anti-osteoporotic interventions aim to address bone health in CKD patients, ongoing research is essential to understand the comparative efficacy and safety of these medications, particularly in different CKD stages, notably in stages 4 and 5.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane CENTRAL for randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy and safety of osteoporosis interventions in CKD up to June 15, 2024. The analysis utilized the pooled odds ratio (OR) along with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI), employing Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software, version 3.0. To assess heterogeneity in the results of individual studies, we used Cochran's Q statistic and the I2 statistic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 12 randomized controlled trials involving 31,027 participants, revealing a significantly lower risk of vertebral fractures with anti-osteoporotic agents (teriparatide, denosumab, romosozumab, raloxifene) compared to placebo (pooled OR, 0.28 [95% CI, 0.22-0.36]). Stratification by CKD stages showed a lower risk in Stages 1-3 but no significant reduction in stages 4 and 5. Teriparatide, denosumab, and romosozumab were effective in lowering fracture risk, whereas Raloxifene showed no significant effect. The lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip BMD showed no significant differences between anti-osteoporotic agents (denosumab, raloxifene, risedronate, alendronate, teriparatide) and placebo. However, romosozumab demonstrated a significantly greater BMD change in all kidney function categories. No reported side effects were observed in CKD stages 1-5 across the trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our meta-analysis highlights the effectiveness of anti-osteoporotic agents in lowering vertebral fracture risk in CKD patients, particularly in stages 1-3. However, this benefit is not apparent in stages 4 and 5, necessitating further research. Despite the absence of reported side effects in CKD patients, clinicians should carefully assess the suitability of these medications, considering individual risks and benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":17813,"journal":{"name":"Kidney & blood pressure research","volume":" ","pages":"581-587"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney & blood pressure research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540235","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Osteoporosis poses a significant health concern, especially for individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD). CKD disrupts mineral and bone metabolism, heightening the risk of fractures and complicating the management of osteoporosis. While anti-osteoporotic interventions aim to address bone health in CKD patients, ongoing research is essential to understand the comparative efficacy and safety of these medications, particularly in different CKD stages, notably in stages 4 and 5.

Methods: We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane CENTRAL for randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy and safety of osteoporosis interventions in CKD up to June 15, 2024. The analysis utilized the pooled odds ratio (OR) along with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI), employing Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software, version 3.0. To assess heterogeneity in the results of individual studies, we used Cochran's Q statistic and the I2 statistic.

Results: We analyzed 12 randomized controlled trials involving 31,027 participants, revealing a significantly lower risk of vertebral fractures with anti-osteoporotic agents (teriparatide, denosumab, romosozumab, raloxifene) compared to placebo (pooled OR, 0.28 [95% CI, 0.22-0.36]). Stratification by CKD stages showed a lower risk in Stages 1-3 but no significant reduction in stages 4 and 5. Teriparatide, denosumab, and romosozumab were effective in lowering fracture risk, whereas Raloxifene showed no significant effect. The lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip BMD showed no significant differences between anti-osteoporotic agents (denosumab, raloxifene, risedronate, alendronate, teriparatide) and placebo. However, romosozumab demonstrated a significantly greater BMD change in all kidney function categories. No reported side effects were observed in CKD stages 1-5 across the trials.

Conclusions: Our meta-analysis highlights the effectiveness of anti-osteoporotic agents in lowering vertebral fracture risk in CKD patients, particularly in stages 1-3. However, this benefit is not apparent in stages 4 and 5, necessitating further research. Despite the absence of reported side effects in CKD patients, clinicians should carefully assess the suitability of these medications, considering individual risks and benefits.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同 CKD 阶段抗骨质疏松药物的有效性和安全性:随机临床试验的 Meta 分析。
导言:骨质疏松症是一个重大的健康问题,尤其是对慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者而言。慢性肾脏病会破坏矿物质和骨代谢,增加骨折风险,并使骨质疏松症的治疗复杂化。虽然抗骨质疏松干预措施旨在解决 CKD 患者的骨骼健康问题,但要了解这些药物的比较疗效和安全性,特别是在不同的 CKD 阶段,尤其是第 4 和第 5 阶段,持续的研究是必不可少的:我们检索了 PubMed/MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane CENTRAL 中截至 2024 年 6 月 15 日评估 CKD 骨质疏松症干预疗效和安全性的随机对照试验。分析采用了综合荟萃分析软件(3.0 版),使用了汇总的几率比(OR)和相应的 95% 置信区间(CI)。为了评估单项研究结果的异质性,我们使用了 Cochran's Q 统计量和 I2 统计量:我们对涉及 31,027 名参与者的 12 项随机对照试验进行了分析,结果显示,与安慰剂相比,抗骨质疏松药物(特立帕肽、地诺单抗、罗莫单抗、雷洛昔芬)的椎体骨折风险明显降低(汇总 OR 值为 0.28 [95% CI,0.22 至 0.36])。按 CKD 阶段进行分层显示,1-3 阶段的风险较低,但 4 和 5 阶段的风险没有显著降低。特立帕肽、地诺单抗和罗莫索单抗可有效降低骨折风险,而雷洛昔芬则无明显效果。抗骨质疏松药物(地诺单抗、雷洛昔芬、利塞膦酸钠、阿仑膦酸钠、特立帕肽)与安慰剂在腰椎、股骨颈和全髋骨密度方面无明显差异。不过,在所有肾功能类别中,Romosozumab 的 BMD 变化都明显更大。在所有试验中,均未观察到CKD 1至5期患者出现副作用:我们的荟萃分析强调了抗骨质疏松药物在降低 CKD 患者椎体骨折风险方面的有效性,尤其是在 1-3 期患者中。然而,这种益处在第 4 期和第 5 期并不明显,因此有必要进行进一步研究。尽管没有关于 CKD 患者副作用的报道,但临床医生应仔细评估这些药物的适用性,同时考虑个人的风险和益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Kidney & blood pressure research
Kidney & blood pressure research 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal comprises both clinical and basic studies at the interface of nephrology, hypertension and cardiovascular research. The topics to be covered include the structural organization and biochemistry of the normal and diseased kidney, the molecular biology of transporters, the physiology and pathophysiology of glomerular filtration and tubular transport, endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cell function and blood pressure control, as well as water, electrolyte and mineral metabolism. Also discussed are the (patho)physiology and (patho) biochemistry of renal hormones, the molecular biology, genetics and clinical course of renal disease and hypertension, the renal elimination, action and clinical use of drugs, as well as dialysis and transplantation. Featuring peer-reviewed original papers, editorials translating basic science into patient-oriented research and disease, in depth reviews, and regular special topic sections, ''Kidney & Blood Pressure Research'' is an important source of information for researchers in nephrology and cardiovascular medicine.
期刊最新文献
Severe coronary artery calcifications in chronic kidney disease patients, coupled with inflammation and bone mineral disease derangement, promote major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) through vascular remodeling. Tandem upregulation of ion transporters in thick ascending limb of Henle's loop of young Milan hypertensive strain of rats. Comprehensive Analysis of RNA Methylation Regulated gene signature and Immune Infiltration in Ischemia/Reperfusion-Induced Acute Kidney Injury. Renal and vascular functional decline in aged low birth weight murine adults. Association between Monocyte-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Inflammation in Chronic Kidney Disease : A Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1