Vaccine hesitancy throughout the COVID-19 vaccination trajectory among immigrant and non-immigrant older adults: a cohort study

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Public Health Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2024.06.007
C. Zlotnick , O. Cohen Castel
{"title":"Vaccine hesitancy throughout the COVID-19 vaccination trajectory among immigrant and non-immigrant older adults: a cohort study","authors":"C. Zlotnick ,&nbsp;O. Cohen Castel","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2024.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The aims of this study were to examine vaccine hesitancy for COVID-19 vaccinations, comparing immigrant and non-immigrant older adults (aged ≥60 years), after accounting for group-level and individual-level characteristics, and the interaction between immigrant and socio-economic status.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>This study used a retrospective cohort design.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Analyses were conducted using R version 4.3.2. Logistic regression models had the dependent variables of obtained any COVID-19 vaccinations vs not and obtained all four required COVID-19 vaccinations vs not. The linear regression model's dependent variable was the interval in days between the COVID-19 vaccination availability and the date of obtaining the first COVID-19 vaccination.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the cohort of older adults (<em>n</em> = 35,109), immigrants were less likely than non-immigrants to obtain a single COVID-19 vaccination (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) or the full series of required COVID-19 vaccinations (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001); however, immigrants vs non-immigrants delayed only in obtaining the first vaccination (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) but not the remaining required COVID-19 vaccinations. In the linear regression model, a longer interval before obtaining the first COVID-19 vaccination was associated with immigrant status (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), lower socio-economic status (SES; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), and the interaction between immigrant status and low SES (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), while a shorter interval was associated with preventive behaviours of obtaining seasonal influenza (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) or pneumococcal (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) vaccinations previously.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Immigrant status in general, and especially when combined with low SES, is a major risk factor for vaccination hesitancy. Reorienting immigrants to embrace preventive healthcare behaviours is key. Culturally appropriate communication campaigns may improve the dissemination of effective vaccination-related information to immigrant communities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350624002488","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The aims of this study were to examine vaccine hesitancy for COVID-19 vaccinations, comparing immigrant and non-immigrant older adults (aged ≥60 years), after accounting for group-level and individual-level characteristics, and the interaction between immigrant and socio-economic status.

Study design

This study used a retrospective cohort design.

Methods

Analyses were conducted using R version 4.3.2. Logistic regression models had the dependent variables of obtained any COVID-19 vaccinations vs not and obtained all four required COVID-19 vaccinations vs not. The linear regression model's dependent variable was the interval in days between the COVID-19 vaccination availability and the date of obtaining the first COVID-19 vaccination.

Results

In the cohort of older adults (n = 35,109), immigrants were less likely than non-immigrants to obtain a single COVID-19 vaccination (P < 0.001) or the full series of required COVID-19 vaccinations (P < 0.001); however, immigrants vs non-immigrants delayed only in obtaining the first vaccination (P < 0.001) but not the remaining required COVID-19 vaccinations. In the linear regression model, a longer interval before obtaining the first COVID-19 vaccination was associated with immigrant status (P < 0.001), lower socio-economic status (SES; P < 0.001), and the interaction between immigrant status and low SES (P < 0.001), while a shorter interval was associated with preventive behaviours of obtaining seasonal influenza (P < 0.001) or pneumococcal (P < 0.001) vaccinations previously.

Conclusions

Immigrant status in general, and especially when combined with low SES, is a major risk factor for vaccination hesitancy. Reorienting immigrants to embrace preventive healthcare behaviours is key. Culturally appropriate communication campaigns may improve the dissemination of effective vaccination-related information to immigrant communities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
移民和非移民老年人在整个 COVID-19 疫苗接种过程中的犹豫不决:一项队列研究。
研究目的本研究旨在比较移民和非移民老年人(年龄≥60岁)对接种COVID-19疫苗的犹豫不决,并考虑群体和个人层面的特征,以及移民和社会经济地位之间的相互作用:研究设计:本研究采用回顾性队列设计:方法:使用 R 4.3.2 版本进行分析。逻辑回归模型的因变量为接种过任何COVID-19疫苗与未接种过COVID-19疫苗,以及接种过所有四种COVID-19疫苗与未接种过COVID-19疫苗。线性回归模型的因变量是 COVID-19 疫苗接种可用性与首次接种 COVID-19 疫苗日期之间的天数间隔:结果:在老年人组群(n = 35109)中,移民比非移民更不可能接种一次 COVID-19 疫苗(P 结论:移民和非移民接种 COVID-19 疫苗的可能性更小,而非移民接种 COVID-19 疫苗的可能性更大:总体而言,移民身份,尤其是与低社会经济地位相结合时,是导致疫苗接种犹豫不决的主要风险因素。重新引导移民接受预防性保健行为是关键。与文化相适应的宣传活动可改善向移民社区传播有效疫苗接种相关信息的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
期刊最新文献
Do current policies reflect current evidence on the relationship between occupational risks and preterm birth, and are they consistent? A policy content analysis. Prevalence and patterns of gender disparity in workplace violence among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The burden of lung cancer and mortality attributable to occupational risk factors between 1990 and 2019 in Brazil and federative units. Comparing higher-dose and single standard-dose influenza vaccines in preventing cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis with 68,713 patients. Parent-child interaction, appetite self-regulation, and BMIz in Chinese preschoolers: a mediation analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1