Parkinson's Disease Inequities in Daily Cognitive Activities: An Intersectional Approach.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Ethnicity & Disease Pub Date : 2024-07-02 eCollection Date: 2024-02-01 DOI:10.18865/ed.34.2.113
Paris B Adkins-Jackson, Nicole Taikeff, Josephine Akingbulu, Justina F Avila-Rieger, Caitlin A Corona-Long
{"title":"Parkinson's Disease Inequities in Daily Cognitive Activities: An Intersectional Approach.","authors":"Paris B Adkins-Jackson, Nicole Taikeff, Josephine Akingbulu, Justina F Avila-Rieger, Caitlin A Corona-Long","doi":"10.18865/ed.34.2.113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Intersectionality approaches to examining differences in Parkinson's disease (PD) based on racialized group, gender identity, and socioeconomic status (SES) are not well covered in the literature. Additionally, the differences in daily cognitive activities for persons diagnosed with PD by racialized group, gender, and SES are undetermined. This study was conducted to explore the differences in PD daily cognitive activities for diverse racialized groups by gender and SES.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a secondary analysis of the Michael J. Fox Foundation's Fox Insight online clinical dataset. Persons with PD were partitioned into 16 racialized by gender groups (Black women, Indigenous men, Latina/x women, Asian men, etc.) that were used in within-group comparisons of low-, middle-, and high-SES-a new variable comprising education and income.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intersectional analyses revealed most items differed between low-SES and high-SES except for items associated with Black and Indigenous men, for whom significant differential item functioning was found between mid-SES and high-SES.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings revealed that within-group differences exist and may be missed in research in which social factors are adjusted for instead of included in the model.</p>","PeriodicalId":50495,"journal":{"name":"Ethnicity & Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11223038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnicity & Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18865/ed.34.2.113","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Intersectionality approaches to examining differences in Parkinson's disease (PD) based on racialized group, gender identity, and socioeconomic status (SES) are not well covered in the literature. Additionally, the differences in daily cognitive activities for persons diagnosed with PD by racialized group, gender, and SES are undetermined. This study was conducted to explore the differences in PD daily cognitive activities for diverse racialized groups by gender and SES.

Methods: This study was a secondary analysis of the Michael J. Fox Foundation's Fox Insight online clinical dataset. Persons with PD were partitioned into 16 racialized by gender groups (Black women, Indigenous men, Latina/x women, Asian men, etc.) that were used in within-group comparisons of low-, middle-, and high-SES-a new variable comprising education and income.

Results: Intersectional analyses revealed most items differed between low-SES and high-SES except for items associated with Black and Indigenous men, for whom significant differential item functioning was found between mid-SES and high-SES.

Conclusions: These findings revealed that within-group differences exist and may be missed in research in which social factors are adjusted for instead of included in the model.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
帕金森病患者在日常认知活动中的不平等:交叉方法。
目的:文献中没有很好地涵盖基于种族群体、性别认同和社会经济地位(SES)的交叉性方法来研究帕金森病(PD)的差异。此外,不同种族、性别和社会经济地位的帕金森病患者在日常认知活动方面的差异也尚未确定。本研究旨在探讨不同种族群体在帕金森病日常认知活动方面的性别和社会经济地位差异:本研究是对迈克尔-J-福克斯基金会的福克斯洞察在线临床数据集进行的二次分析。将患有帕金森病的人按性别分为 16 个种族化群体(黑人女性、土著男性、拉丁裔/x 女性、亚裔男性等),用于低、中、高社会经济地位组内比较--社会经济地位是由教育程度和收入组成的新变量:交叉分析表明,除与黑人和土著男性相关的项目外,大多数项目在低社会经济地位和高社会经济地位之间存在差异,在中社会经济地位和高社会经济地位之间,黑人和土著男性的项目功能存在显著差异:这些研究结果表明,群体内差异是存在的,在研究中可能会忽略社会因素,而不是将其纳入模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethnicity & Disease
Ethnicity & Disease 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ethnicity & Disease is an international journal that exclusively publishes information on the causal and associative relationships in the etiology of common illnesses through the study of ethnic patterns of disease. Topics focus on: ethnic differentials in disease rates;impact of migration on health status; social and ethnic factors related to health care access and health; and metabolic epidemiology. A major priority of the journal is to provide a forum for exchange between the United States and the developing countries of Europe, Africa, Asia, and Latin America.
期刊最新文献
Multilevel Determinants of Long COVID and Potential for Telehealth Intervention. Physical Activity Engagement among Black Immigrants and African American Adults in the 2010 to 2018 NHIS Study. Racial and Ethnic Differences in Emotional Reactions to the Flint Water Crisis among Michigan Women in Communities Outside of Flint. Social Vulnerability May Underlie Racial Disparities in Peripartum Cardiomyopathy Outcomes. Youth Perspectives on the Flint Water Crisis and Its Health Effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1