The use of venous blood gas in assessing arterial acid-base and oxygenation status - an analysis of aggregated data from multiple studies evaluating the venous to arterial conversion (v-TAC) method.

Expert review of respiratory medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1080/17476348.2024.2378021
Lisha Shastri, Lars Pilegaard Thomsen, Marianne Toftegaard, Gitte Boier Tygesen, Ulla Møller Weinreich, Beate Agnieszka Rychwicka-Kielek, Michael Gordon Davies, Magnus Ekström, Harald Rittger, Anne-Maree Kelly, Søren Risom Kristensen, Søren Kjærgaard, Panagiotis Kamperidis, Ari Manuel, Kjeld Asbjørn Damgaard, Steen Andreassen, Stephen Edward Rees
{"title":"The use of venous blood gas in assessing arterial acid-base and oxygenation status - an analysis of aggregated data from multiple studies evaluating the venous to arterial conversion (v-TAC) method.","authors":"Lisha Shastri, Lars Pilegaard Thomsen, Marianne Toftegaard, Gitte Boier Tygesen, Ulla Møller Weinreich, Beate Agnieszka Rychwicka-Kielek, Michael Gordon Davies, Magnus Ekström, Harald Rittger, Anne-Maree Kelly, Søren Risom Kristensen, Søren Kjærgaard, Panagiotis Kamperidis, Ari Manuel, Kjeld Asbjørn Damgaard, Steen Andreassen, Stephen Edward Rees","doi":"10.1080/17476348.2024.2378021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several methods exist to reduce the number of arterial blood gases (ABGs). One method, Roche v-TAC, has been evaluated in different patient groups. This paper aggregates data from these studies, in different patient categories using common analysis criteria.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We included studies evaluating v-TAC based on paired arterial and peripheral venous blood samples. Bland-Altman analysis compared measured and calculated arterial values of pH, PCO<sub>2</sub>, and PO<sub>2</sub>. Subgroup analyses were performed for normal, chronic hypercapnia and chronic base excess, acute hyper- and hypocapnia, and acute and chronic base deficits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>811 samples from 12 studies were included. Bias and limits of agreement for measured and calculated values: pH 0.001 (-0.029 to 0.031), PCO<sub>2</sub> -0.08 (-0.65 to 0.49) kPa, and PO<sub>2</sub> 0.04 (-1.71 to 1.78) kPa, with similar values for all sub-group analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These data suggest that v-TAC analysis may have a role in replacing ABGs, avoiding arterial puncture. Substantial data exist in patients with chronic hypercapnia and chronic base excess, acute hyper- and hypocapnia, and in patients with relatively normal acid-base status, with similar bias and precision across groups and across study data. Limited data exist for patients with acute and chronic base deficits.</p>","PeriodicalId":94007,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of respiratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2024.2378021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several methods exist to reduce the number of arterial blood gases (ABGs). One method, Roche v-TAC, has been evaluated in different patient groups. This paper aggregates data from these studies, in different patient categories using common analysis criteria.

Research design and methods: We included studies evaluating v-TAC based on paired arterial and peripheral venous blood samples. Bland-Altman analysis compared measured and calculated arterial values of pH, PCO2, and PO2. Subgroup analyses were performed for normal, chronic hypercapnia and chronic base excess, acute hyper- and hypocapnia, and acute and chronic base deficits.

Results: 811 samples from 12 studies were included. Bias and limits of agreement for measured and calculated values: pH 0.001 (-0.029 to 0.031), PCO2 -0.08 (-0.65 to 0.49) kPa, and PO2 0.04 (-1.71 to 1.78) kPa, with similar values for all sub-group analyses.

Conclusion: These data suggest that v-TAC analysis may have a role in replacing ABGs, avoiding arterial puncture. Substantial data exist in patients with chronic hypercapnia and chronic base excess, acute hyper- and hypocapnia, and in patients with relatively normal acid-base status, with similar bias and precision across groups and across study data. Limited data exist for patients with acute and chronic base deficits.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用静脉血气评估动脉酸碱和氧合状态--对评估静脉到动脉转换(v-TAC)方法的多项研究的汇总数据进行分析。
背景:有几种方法可以减少动脉血气(ABGs)的次数。罗氏 v-TAC 方法已在不同患者群体中进行了评估。本文采用共同的分析标准,汇总了来自不同患者类别的研究数据:研究设计:我们纳入了基于配对动脉血和外周静脉血样本对 v-TAC 进行评估的研究。对正常、慢性高碳酸血症和慢性碱过量、急性高碳酸血症和低碳酸血症以及急性和慢性碱缺乏进行了分组分析:共纳入了 12 项研究的 811 个样本。测量值和计算值的偏差和一致限度:pH 0.001(-0.029 至 0.031),PCO2 -0.08(-0.65 至 0.49)kPa,PO20.04(-1.71 至 1.78)kPa,所有亚组分析的数值相似:这些数据表明,v-TAC 分析可替代 ABGs,避免动脉穿刺。在慢性高碳酸血症和慢性碱中毒患者、急性高碳酸血症和低碳酸血症患者以及酸碱状态相对正常的患者中存在大量数据,不同组别和不同研究数据的偏差和精确度相似。急性和慢性碱基缺乏患者的数据有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advancements and challenges in the management of pneumonia in elderly patients with COPD. Compatibility of the global lung function 2012 spirometry reference values in children, adolescents and young adults: a systematic review. Recent advances in the use of liquid biopsy for the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. What is the future of inhaled antibiotics for bronchiectasis? Effects of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator potentiators on clinical outcomes of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1