Golf cart-related neurosurgical injuries.

Surgical neurology international Pub Date : 2024-06-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.25259/SNI_185_2024
Annelisse Torres-Urquia, Orlando De Jesus
{"title":"Golf cart-related neurosurgical injuries.","authors":"Annelisse Torres-Urquia, Orlando De Jesus","doi":"10.25259/SNI_185_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Head and spine injuries sustained following golf cart accidents have been rarely analyzed. This study aimed to describe a series of patients sustaining golf cart injuries requiring neurosurgical management for head or spine injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The University of Puerto Rico Neurosurgery database was used to retrospectively identify and investigate patients who sustained a golf cart-related injury requiring a neurosurgical evaluation during 15 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis identified 25 patients with golf cart-related injuries requiring neurosurgical management with a median age of 16 (interquartile range 13-34). Seventeen patients (68%) were female. The primary mechanism of injury was ejection from the cart in 84% of the patients (<i>n</i> = 21). The most frequent head injury was a skull fracture in 80% of patients (<i>n</i> = 20). Intracranial hemorrhage was present in 76% of patients (<i>n</i> = 19), with brain contusions (<i>n</i> = 16, 64%) being the most common. Eighteen patients (72%) were admitted for surgery or neurological monitoring. The median hospital length of stay among hospitalized patients was 5.5 days. Ten patients (40%) were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a median stay of 8.5 days. Four patients (16%) required surgery for their injuries. At discharge, 80% of patients (<i>n</i> = 20) had a good outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that children and adolescents are at high risk for golf cart-related neurosurgical injuries. This form of transportation can produce considerable neurological injuries, the primary mechanism of injury being ejection from the cart. Approximately three-quarters of the patients need hospital admission, with half requiring an ICU stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":94217,"journal":{"name":"Surgical neurology international","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11225500/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical neurology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_185_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Head and spine injuries sustained following golf cart accidents have been rarely analyzed. This study aimed to describe a series of patients sustaining golf cart injuries requiring neurosurgical management for head or spine injuries.

Methods: The University of Puerto Rico Neurosurgery database was used to retrospectively identify and investigate patients who sustained a golf cart-related injury requiring a neurosurgical evaluation during 15 years.

Results: The analysis identified 25 patients with golf cart-related injuries requiring neurosurgical management with a median age of 16 (interquartile range 13-34). Seventeen patients (68%) were female. The primary mechanism of injury was ejection from the cart in 84% of the patients (n = 21). The most frequent head injury was a skull fracture in 80% of patients (n = 20). Intracranial hemorrhage was present in 76% of patients (n = 19), with brain contusions (n = 16, 64%) being the most common. Eighteen patients (72%) were admitted for surgery or neurological monitoring. The median hospital length of stay among hospitalized patients was 5.5 days. Ten patients (40%) were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a median stay of 8.5 days. Four patients (16%) required surgery for their injuries. At discharge, 80% of patients (n = 20) had a good outcome.

Conclusion: This study showed that children and adolescents are at high risk for golf cart-related neurosurgical injuries. This form of transportation can produce considerable neurological injuries, the primary mechanism of injury being ejection from the cart. Approximately three-quarters of the patients need hospital admission, with half requiring an ICU stay.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与高尔夫球车有关的神经外科损伤。
背景:很少有人对高尔夫球车事故造成的头部和脊柱损伤进行分析。本研究旨在描述一系列因头部或脊柱受伤而需要神经外科治疗的高尔夫球车受伤患者:方法:使用波多黎各大学神经外科数据库,回顾性地识别和调查 15 年间因高尔夫球车受伤而需要进行神经外科评估的患者:分析确定了 25 名需要接受神经外科治疗的高尔夫球车相关损伤患者,中位年龄为 16 岁(四分位间范围为 13-34 岁)。17名患者(68%)为女性。84%的患者(21 人)受伤的主要原因是被高尔夫球车抛出。最常见的头部损伤是颅骨骨折,占患者总数的 80%(20 人)。76%的患者(19 人)出现颅内出血,最常见的是脑挫伤(16 人,64%)。18名患者(72%)入院接受手术或神经监测。住院患者的中位住院时间为 5.5 天。10名患者(40%)住进了重症监护室(ICU),中位住院时间为8.5天。四名患者(16%)因伤需要手术治疗。出院时,80%的患者(20 人)疗效良好:这项研究表明,儿童和青少年是高尔夫球车相关神经外科损伤的高危人群。这种交通方式会造成严重的神经损伤,主要损伤机制是被高尔夫球车抛出。大约四分之三的患者需要入院治疗,其中一半需要入住重症监护室。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A case of spontaneous direct vertebral artery - External vertebral venous plexus fistula in the upper cervical portion. Before blaming glucocorticoids for prolonged postoperative hypotension, alternative explanations must be carefully ruled out. Hybrid open-endovascular onyx embolization of spinal type IVb perimedullary spinal arteriovenous fistula through direct posterior spinal vein access: A case report. Liberal use of ketamine is on the rise! A critical warning!! Occurrence of malignant cerebral infarction following intracranial hematoma evacuation in traumatic brain injury: A case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1