Unveiling the adverse effects of artificial intelligence on financial decisions via the AI-IMPACT model

IF 6.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Current Opinion in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-06-29 DOI:10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101843
Wendy De La Rosa , Christopher J. Bechler
{"title":"Unveiling the adverse effects of artificial intelligence on financial decisions via the AI-IMPACT model","authors":"Wendy De La Rosa ,&nbsp;Christopher J. Bechler","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is considerable enthusiasm for the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to improve financial well-being. Despite this enthusiasm, it is important to underscore AI's potential adverse effects on consumers' financial decisions. We introduce the AI-IMPACT model, a unifying theoretical framework for how AI can influence consumers' financial decisions. The model details how AI impacts the marketplace, affecting psychological processes and consumer traits core to financial decision-making (e.g., pain of payment, financial literacy). We use the AI-IMPACT model to illustrate one way AI can reduce financial well-being as its influence on the marketplace (e.g., facilitating biometric payment methods) decreases consumers' pain of payment, increasing spending. Lastly, we use the AI-IMPACT model to identify areas for future research at the intersection of AI and financial decision-making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 101843"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X24000563/pdfft?md5=5dc15b779294c9562c984507569e4333&pid=1-s2.0-S2352250X24000563-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X24000563","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is considerable enthusiasm for the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to improve financial well-being. Despite this enthusiasm, it is important to underscore AI's potential adverse effects on consumers' financial decisions. We introduce the AI-IMPACT model, a unifying theoretical framework for how AI can influence consumers' financial decisions. The model details how AI impacts the marketplace, affecting psychological processes and consumer traits core to financial decision-making (e.g., pain of payment, financial literacy). We use the AI-IMPACT model to illustrate one way AI can reduce financial well-being as its influence on the marketplace (e.g., facilitating biometric payment methods) decreases consumers' pain of payment, increasing spending. Lastly, we use the AI-IMPACT model to identify areas for future research at the intersection of AI and financial decision-making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过 AI-IMPACT 模型揭示人工智能对财务决策的不利影响
人们对人工智能(AI)改善财务状况的潜力充满热情。尽管如此,强调人工智能对消费者财务决策的潜在不利影响也很重要。我们介绍 AI-IMPACT 模型,这是一个关于人工智能如何影响消费者财务决策的统一理论框架。该模型详细阐述了人工智能如何影响市场,影响消费者的心理过程和金融决策的核心特征(如支付痛苦、金融知识)。我们使用 AI-IMPACT 模型来说明人工智能降低财务福祉的一种方式,因为人工智能对市场的影响(如促进生物识别支付方法)会降低消费者的支付痛苦,从而增加消费。最后,我们利用人工智能-IMPACT 模型确定了人工智能与金融决策交叉领域的未来研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Psychology
Current Opinion in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
293
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Psychology is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals and is a companion to the primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach to ensure they are a widely-read resource that is integral to scientists' workflows. Current Opinion in Psychology is divided into themed sections, some of which may be reviewed on an annual basis if appropriate. The amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. The topics covered will include: * Biological psychology * Clinical psychology * Cognitive psychology * Community psychology * Comparative psychology * Developmental psychology * Educational psychology * Environmental psychology * Evolutionary psychology * Health psychology * Neuropsychology * Personality psychology * Social psychology
期刊最新文献
A sender-message-receiver (SMeR) framework for communicating persuasive social norms – The case of climate change mitigation behavioral change Hype-free AI: How AI actually impacts psychology in research, the workplace, the marketplace, and beyond Editorial overview: Mapping the current state of affairs and future outlook of self-control and self-regulation research: From effortful inhibition to motivated and situated strategies From perception to projection: Exploring neuroaffective advances in understanding optimism bias and belief updating Effects of personality and gender on nudgeability for mental health-related behaviors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1