Effect of Acupuncture for Methadone Reduction : A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 19.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Annals of Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-09 DOI:10.7326/M23-2721
Liming Lu, Chen Chen, Yiming Chen, Yu Dong, Rouhao Chen, Xiaojing Wei, Chenyang Tao, Cui Li, Yuting Wang, Baochao Fan, Xiaorong Tang, Shichao Xu, Zhiqiu He, Guodong Mo, Yiliang Liu, Hong Gu, Xiang Li, Fang Cao, Hongxia Xu, Yuqing Zhang, Guowei Li, Xinxia Liu, Jingchun Zeng, Chunzhi Tang, Nenggui Xu
{"title":"Effect of Acupuncture for Methadone Reduction : A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Liming Lu, Chen Chen, Yiming Chen, Yu Dong, Rouhao Chen, Xiaojing Wei, Chenyang Tao, Cui Li, Yuting Wang, Baochao Fan, Xiaorong Tang, Shichao Xu, Zhiqiu He, Guodong Mo, Yiliang Liu, Hong Gu, Xiang Li, Fang Cao, Hongxia Xu, Yuqing Zhang, Guowei Li, Xinxia Liu, Jingchun Zeng, Chunzhi Tang, Nenggui Xu","doi":"10.7326/M23-2721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) is effective for managing opioid use disorder, but adverse effects mean that optimal therapy occurs with the lowest dose that controls opioid craving.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the efficacy of acupuncture versus sham acupuncture on methadone dose reduction.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicenter, 2-group, randomized, sham-controlled trial. (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2200058123).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>6 MMT clinics in China.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adults aged 65 years or younger with opioid use disorder who attended clinic daily and had been using MMT for at least 6 weeks.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Acupuncture or sham acupuncture 3 times a week for 8 weeks.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>The 2 primary outcomes were the proportion of participants who achieved a reduction in methadone dose of 20% or more compared with baseline and opioid craving, which was measured by the change from baseline on a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 118 eligible participants, 60 were randomly assigned to acupuncture and 58 were randomly assigned to sham acupuncture (2 did not receive acupuncture). At week 8, more patients reduced their methadone dose 20% or more with acupuncture than with sham acupuncture (37 [62%] vs. 16 [29%]; risk difference, 32% [97.5% CI, 13% to 52%]; <i>P</i> < 0.001). In addition, acupuncture was more effective in decreasing opioid craving than sham acupuncture with a mean difference of -11.7 mm VAS (CI, -18.7 to -4.8 mm; <i>P</i> < 0.001). No serious adverse events occurred. There were no notable differences between study groups when participants were asked which type of acupuncture they received.</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>Fixed acupuncture protocol limited personalization and only 12 weeks of follow-up after stopping acupuncture.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Eight weeks of acupuncture were superior to sham acupuncture in reducing methadone dose and decreasing opioid craving.</p><p><strong>Primary funding source: </strong>National Natural Science Foundation of China.</p>","PeriodicalId":7932,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Internal Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":19.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7326/M23-2721","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) is effective for managing opioid use disorder, but adverse effects mean that optimal therapy occurs with the lowest dose that controls opioid craving.

Objective: To assess the efficacy of acupuncture versus sham acupuncture on methadone dose reduction.

Design: Multicenter, 2-group, randomized, sham-controlled trial. (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2200058123).

Setting: 6 MMT clinics in China.

Participants: Adults aged 65 years or younger with opioid use disorder who attended clinic daily and had been using MMT for at least 6 weeks.

Intervention: Acupuncture or sham acupuncture 3 times a week for 8 weeks.

Measurements: The 2 primary outcomes were the proportion of participants who achieved a reduction in methadone dose of 20% or more compared with baseline and opioid craving, which was measured by the change from baseline on a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS).

Results: Of 118 eligible participants, 60 were randomly assigned to acupuncture and 58 were randomly assigned to sham acupuncture (2 did not receive acupuncture). At week 8, more patients reduced their methadone dose 20% or more with acupuncture than with sham acupuncture (37 [62%] vs. 16 [29%]; risk difference, 32% [97.5% CI, 13% to 52%]; P < 0.001). In addition, acupuncture was more effective in decreasing opioid craving than sham acupuncture with a mean difference of -11.7 mm VAS (CI, -18.7 to -4.8 mm; P < 0.001). No serious adverse events occurred. There were no notable differences between study groups when participants were asked which type of acupuncture they received.

Limitation: Fixed acupuncture protocol limited personalization and only 12 weeks of follow-up after stopping acupuncture.

Conclusion: Eight weeks of acupuncture were superior to sham acupuncture in reducing methadone dose and decreasing opioid craving.

Primary funding source: National Natural Science Foundation of China.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针灸减少美沙酮的效果:随机临床试验。
背景:美沙酮维持治疗(MMT)可有效控制阿片类药物使用障碍,但其不良反应意味着最佳治疗需要使用能控制阿片类药物渴求的最低剂量:评估针灸与假针灸对减少美沙酮剂量的疗效:设计:多中心、两组、随机、假对照试验。(中国临床试验注册中心:ChiCTR2200058123):地点:中国 6 家 MMT 诊所:干预措施:针灸或假针灸 3 次:干预措施:针灸或假针灸,每周3次,持续8周:两个主要结果是美沙酮剂量比基线减少20%或更多的参与者比例和阿片类药物渴求度,渴求度以100毫米视觉模拟量表(VAS)与基线相比的变化来衡量:在 118 名符合条件的参与者中,60 人被随机分配到针灸治疗,58 人被随机分配到假针灸治疗(2 人未接受针灸治疗)。第 8 周时,与假针灸相比,更多患者在针灸后将美沙酮剂量减少了 20% 或更多(37 [62%] vs. 16 [29%];风险差异,32% [97.5% CI,13% to 52%];P P 局限性:固定的针灸方案限制了个性化治疗,停止针灸后只有 12 周的随访:结论:在减少美沙酮剂量和降低阿片类药物渴求方面,八周针灸优于假针灸:国家自然科学基金委员会
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Internal Medicine
Annals of Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
23.90
自引率
1.80%
发文量
1136
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians (ACP), Annals of Internal Medicine is the premier internal medicine journal. Annals of Internal Medicine’s mission is to promote excellence in medicine, enable physicians and other health care professionals to be well informed members of the medical community and society, advance standards in the conduct and reporting of medical research, and contribute to improving the health of people worldwide. To achieve this mission, the journal publishes a wide variety of original research, review articles, practice guidelines, and commentary relevant to clinical practice, health care delivery, public health, health care policy, medical education, ethics, and research methodology. In addition, the journal publishes personal narratives that convey the feeling and the art of medicine.
期刊最新文献
In subclinical AF, the benefit of apixaban vs. aspirin on stroke or systemic embolism trended higher with CHA2DS2-VASc >4. In symptomatic knee OA, adding oral methotrexate to usual analgesia reduced pain at 6 mo. In T2D, SGLT-2 inhibitor effects on CV and kidney outcomes were consistent regardless of GLP-1 receptor agonist use. Patient Travel Patterns and Concordance With Geographic Market Boundaries. Patients surviving COVID-19 had lower risk for long COVID in the Omicron vs. earlier eras.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1