Predictive value of dynamic arterial elastance for vasopressor withdrawal: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Annals of Intensive Care Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1186/s13613-024-01345-8
Jorge Iván Alvarado-Sánchez, Sergio Salazar-Ruiz, Juan Daniel Caicedo-Ruiz, Juan José Diaztagle-Fernández, Yenny Rocio Cárdenas-Bolivar, Fredy Leonardo Carreño-Hernandez, Andrés Felipe Mora-Salamanca, Andrea Valentina Montañez-Nariño, María Valentina Stozitzky-Ríos, Carlos Santacruz-Herrera, Gustavo Adolfo Ospina-Tascón, Michael R Pinsky
{"title":"Predictive value of dynamic arterial elastance for vasopressor withdrawal: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Jorge Iván Alvarado-Sánchez, Sergio Salazar-Ruiz, Juan Daniel Caicedo-Ruiz, Juan José Diaztagle-Fernández, Yenny Rocio Cárdenas-Bolivar, Fredy Leonardo Carreño-Hernandez, Andrés Felipe Mora-Salamanca, Andrea Valentina Montañez-Nariño, María Valentina Stozitzky-Ríos, Carlos Santacruz-Herrera, Gustavo Adolfo Ospina-Tascón, Michael R Pinsky","doi":"10.1186/s13613-024-01345-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dynamic arterial elastance (Ea<sub>dyn</sub>) has been investigated for its ability to predict hypotension during the weaning of vasopressors. Our study focused on assessing Ea<sub>dyn</sub>'s performance in the context of critically ill adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit, regardless of diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Main body: </strong>Our study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis checklist. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023421462) on May 26, 2023. We included prospective observational studies from the MEDLINE and Embase databases through May 2023. Five studies involving 183 patients were included in the quantitative analysis. We extracted data related to patient clinical characteristics, and information about Ea<sub>dyn</sub> measurement methods, results, and norepinephrine dose. Most patients (76%) were diagnosed with septic shock, while the remaining patients required norepinephrine for other reasons. The average pressure responsiveness rate was 36.20%. The synthesized results yielded an area under the curve of 0.85, with a sensitivity of 0.87 (95% CI 0.74-0.93), specificity of 0.76 (95% CI 0.68-0.83), and diagnostic odds ratio of 19.07 (95% CI 8.47-42.92). Subgroup analyses indicated no variations in the Ea<sub>dyn</sub> based on norepinephrine dosage, the Ea<sub>dyn</sub> measurement device, or the Ea<sub>dyn</sub> diagnostic cutoff to predict cessation of vasopressor support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ea<sub>dyn</sub>, evaluated through subgroup analyses, demonstrated good predictive ability for the discontinuation of vasopressor support in critically ill patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"14 1","pages":"108"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11233481/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-024-01345-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dynamic arterial elastance (Eadyn) has been investigated for its ability to predict hypotension during the weaning of vasopressors. Our study focused on assessing Eadyn's performance in the context of critically ill adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit, regardless of diagnosis.

Main body: Our study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis checklist. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023421462) on May 26, 2023. We included prospective observational studies from the MEDLINE and Embase databases through May 2023. Five studies involving 183 patients were included in the quantitative analysis. We extracted data related to patient clinical characteristics, and information about Eadyn measurement methods, results, and norepinephrine dose. Most patients (76%) were diagnosed with septic shock, while the remaining patients required norepinephrine for other reasons. The average pressure responsiveness rate was 36.20%. The synthesized results yielded an area under the curve of 0.85, with a sensitivity of 0.87 (95% CI 0.74-0.93), specificity of 0.76 (95% CI 0.68-0.83), and diagnostic odds ratio of 19.07 (95% CI 8.47-42.92). Subgroup analyses indicated no variations in the Eadyn based on norepinephrine dosage, the Eadyn measurement device, or the Eadyn diagnostic cutoff to predict cessation of vasopressor support.

Conclusions: Eadyn, evaluated through subgroup analyses, demonstrated good predictive ability for the discontinuation of vasopressor support in critically ill patients.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动态动脉弹性对停用血管加压药的预测价值:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:动态动脉弹性(Eadyn)已被研究用于预测血管加压素断流期间的低血压。我们的研究重点是在重症监护室收治的成年重症患者中评估 Eadyn 的性能,无论其诊断结果如何:我们的研究是根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》清单进行的。研究方案于 2023 年 5 月 26 日在 PROSPERO(CRD42023421462)上注册。我们纳入了 MEDLINE 和 Embase 数据库中截至 2023 年 5 月的前瞻性观察研究。定量分析共纳入了 5 项研究,涉及 183 名患者。我们提取了与患者临床特征相关的数据,以及有关 Eadyn 测量方法、结果和去甲肾上腺素剂量的信息。大多数患者(76%)被诊断为脓毒性休克,其余患者因其他原因需要去甲肾上腺素。平均压力反应率为 36.20%。综合结果得出的曲线下面积为 0.85,灵敏度为 0.87(95% CI 0.74-0.93),特异性为 0.76(95% CI 0.68-0.83),诊断几率比为 19.07(95% CI 8.47-42.92)。亚组分析表明,基于去甲肾上腺素剂量、Eadyn测量设备或Eadyn诊断临界值的Eadyn在预测停止血管加压支持方面没有差异:通过亚组分析评估的 Eadyn 对重症患者停止血管加压支持具有良好的预测能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
期刊最新文献
Alteplase in COVID-19 severe hypoxemic respiratory failure: the TRISTARDS multicenter randomized trial. Angiopoietin-2 as a prognostic biomarker in septic adult patients: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Editorial: Severe bleeding events among critically ill patients with hematological malignancies. Changes in portal pulsatility index induced by a fluid challenge in patients with haemodynamic instability and systemic venous congestion: a prospective cohort study. Corticosteroid treatment in COVID-19 patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: benefit from rational use - authors' reply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1