Sparing confirmatory testing in primary aldosteronism (SCIPA): a multicenter retrospective diagnostic accuracy study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM BMC Endocrine Disorders Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1186/s12902-024-01638-w
Albert Macaire C Ong Lopez, Leo E Tiu, Diana Collen Dimayuga, Oliver Allan C Dampil, Erick S Mendoza, Michael L Villa, Andrea Marie Macabuag-Oliva
{"title":"Sparing confirmatory testing in primary aldosteronism (SCIPA): a multicenter retrospective diagnostic accuracy study.","authors":"Albert Macaire C Ong Lopez, Leo E Tiu, Diana Collen Dimayuga, Oliver Allan C Dampil, Erick S Mendoza, Michael L Villa, Andrea Marie Macabuag-Oliva","doi":"10.1186/s12902-024-01638-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA) is comprehensive, which includes case-detection testing, case confirmation followed by subtype classification. In certain instances, such as in the setting of spontaneous hypokalemia, suppressed renin activity (PRA) plus plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) of > 15 ng/dL, one may not proceed with confirmatory tests. However, the quality of evidence behind this approach is very low. This study sought to evaluate the proposed \"simplified confirmatory pathway\" that can spare confirmatory testing for primary aldosteronism by evaluating the diagnostic performances of the various pre-specified PAC thresholds in combination with findings of suppressed renin and spontaneous hypokalemia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a multi-center, retrospective diagnostic accuracy cohort-selected cross-sectional study. A total of 133 participants aged 18 years and above underwent saline infusion test between January 2010 to March 2024. The outcome measures comprise of the diagnostic performances of the different index test combinations (baseline PAC, baseline PRA and presence of spontaneous hypokalemia): sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic accuracy. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 29.0.1.0 & MedCalc 20.218.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 133 patients who underwent saline infusion test, 88 (66.17%) were diagnosed with PA. A PAC of > 25 ng/dL plus PRA < 1.0 ng/dL/hr with spontaneous hypokalemia showed the highest specificity at 100% (95% CI 90.51%, 100.00%) and positive predictive value at 100% (85.18 - 100.00%). The minimum acceptable combination criteria were determined to be a PAC of > 20 ng/dL plus PRA < 0.6 ng/dL/hr, and presence of spontaneous hypokalemia. It has high specificity (94.59%; 95% CI 81.81%, 99.34%), positive predictive value (93.55%, 95% CI 78.49%, 98.29%), and moderate positive likelihood ratio (LR+) (6.39, 95% CI 1.61, 25.38) CONCLUSION: A hypertensive patient with spontaneous hypokalemia and screening findings of PAC > 20 ng/dL and suppressed PRA of < 0.6 ng/ml/hr, may be classified as \"overt primary aldosteronism confirmed\" and may not need to proceed with dynamic confirmatory testing.</p><p><strong>Protocol registration number: </strong>SRCTN34186253.</p>","PeriodicalId":9152,"journal":{"name":"BMC Endocrine Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11229226/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Endocrine Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-024-01638-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA) is comprehensive, which includes case-detection testing, case confirmation followed by subtype classification. In certain instances, such as in the setting of spontaneous hypokalemia, suppressed renin activity (PRA) plus plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) of > 15 ng/dL, one may not proceed with confirmatory tests. However, the quality of evidence behind this approach is very low. This study sought to evaluate the proposed "simplified confirmatory pathway" that can spare confirmatory testing for primary aldosteronism by evaluating the diagnostic performances of the various pre-specified PAC thresholds in combination with findings of suppressed renin and spontaneous hypokalemia.

Methods: This is a multi-center, retrospective diagnostic accuracy cohort-selected cross-sectional study. A total of 133 participants aged 18 years and above underwent saline infusion test between January 2010 to March 2024. The outcome measures comprise of the diagnostic performances of the different index test combinations (baseline PAC, baseline PRA and presence of spontaneous hypokalemia): sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic accuracy. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 29.0.1.0 & MedCalc 20.218.

Results: Of the 133 patients who underwent saline infusion test, 88 (66.17%) were diagnosed with PA. A PAC of > 25 ng/dL plus PRA < 1.0 ng/dL/hr with spontaneous hypokalemia showed the highest specificity at 100% (95% CI 90.51%, 100.00%) and positive predictive value at 100% (85.18 - 100.00%). The minimum acceptable combination criteria were determined to be a PAC of > 20 ng/dL plus PRA < 0.6 ng/dL/hr, and presence of spontaneous hypokalemia. It has high specificity (94.59%; 95% CI 81.81%, 99.34%), positive predictive value (93.55%, 95% CI 78.49%, 98.29%), and moderate positive likelihood ratio (LR+) (6.39, 95% CI 1.61, 25.38) CONCLUSION: A hypertensive patient with spontaneous hypokalemia and screening findings of PAC > 20 ng/dL and suppressed PRA of < 0.6 ng/ml/hr, may be classified as "overt primary aldosteronism confirmed" and may not need to proceed with dynamic confirmatory testing.

Protocol registration number: SRCTN34186253.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原发性醛固酮增多症(原发性醛固酮增多症)少做确诊试验:一项多中心回顾性诊断准确性研究。
背景:原发性醛固酮增多症(PA)的诊断非常全面,包括病例检测、病例确诊和亚型分类。在某些情况下,例如自发性低钾血症、肾素活性(PRA)受抑制、血浆醛固酮浓度(PAC)> 15 ng/dL,可以不进行确诊试验。然而,这种方法的证据质量很低。本研究试图评估所提出的 "简化确诊路径",通过评估各种预先指定的 PAC 阈值结合肾素抑制和自发性低钾血症结果的诊断性能,从而避免原发性醛固酮增多症的确诊试验:这是一项多中心、回顾性诊断准确性队列选择横断面研究。共有 133 名年龄在 18 岁及以上的参与者在 2010 年 1 月至 2024 年 3 月期间接受了生理盐水输注测试。结果测量包括不同指标测试组合(基线 PAC、基线 PRA 和是否存在自发性低钾血症)的诊断性能:灵敏度、特异性、阴性预测值、阳性预测值、阳性似然比、阴性似然比和诊断准确性。数据分析采用 SPSS 29.0.1.0 和 MedCalc 20.218:在接受生理盐水输注测试的 133 名患者中,88 人(66.17%)被诊断为 PA。PAC > 25 ng/dL 加上 PRA < 1.0 ng/dL/hr 并伴有自发性低钾血症的特异性最高,为 100%(95% CI 90.51%,100.00%),阳性预测值为 100%(85.18 - 100.00%)。可接受的最低组合标准被确定为 PAC > 20 纳克/分升,PRA < 0.6 纳克/分升/小时,以及存在自发性低钾血症。它具有较高的特异性(94.59%;95% CI 81.81%,99.34%)、阳性预测值(93.55%,95% CI 78.49%,98.29%)和中等的阳性似然比(LR+)(6.39,95% CI 1.61,25.38)结论:自发性低钾血症、筛查结果为 PAC > 20 ng/dL 和 PRA 抑制 < 0.6 ng/ml/hr的高血压患者可被归类为 "已确诊的原发性醛固酮增多症",可能不需要进行动态确证试验:SRCTN34186253。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Endocrine Disorders
BMC Endocrine Disorders ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Endocrine Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of endocrine disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Diabetes screening among women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a descriptive study of commercial claims, 2011–2019 Unravelling a hidden pathology of a vertebral fracture in a teenage girl Exploring the unique association between high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and vitamin D deficiency in adults aged 20–59: findings based on the NHANES database Relationship between four visceral obesity indices and prediabetes and diabetes: a cross-sectional study in Dalian, China Prevalence, patterns, and determinants of vascular complications of type 2 diabetes in a teaching hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a retrospective study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1