Complications following surgical treatment of patella fractures - a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1007/s00068-024-02592-x
Jeppe Damgren Vesterager, Hannes Torngren, Rasmus Elsoe, Peter Larsen
{"title":"Complications following surgical treatment of patella fractures - a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis.","authors":"Jeppe Damgren Vesterager, Hannes Torngren, Rasmus Elsoe, Peter Larsen","doi":"10.1007/s00068-024-02592-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this systematic review and proportional meta-analysis was to identify complications of surgical treatment of patella fractures and to estimate their incidence. We extended existing knowledge on this topic by including several more recent and large-scale studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. After searching in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and OpenGrey, all studies after 2000, with study populations > 100 patients, including only patients > 18 years and follow-up > 30 days, were included. Two independent authors assessed the literature search and extracted the data. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. The meta-analysis was performed on complications pooled in infections, nonunion, symptomatic implant removal, and fixation failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data on complications were available from 14 studies, including a pool of 5659 patients. The most common complication was symptomatic implant removal, affecting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgically, treatment of patella fractures was associated with a high risk of complications. The most common complication was symptomatic implant removal, affecting 29.6% of patients. Other complications stated were fixation failure 5.2%, infections 3.1% and nonunion 1.7%.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-024-02592-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this systematic review and proportional meta-analysis was to identify complications of surgical treatment of patella fractures and to estimate their incidence. We extended existing knowledge on this topic by including several more recent and large-scale studies.

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. After searching in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and OpenGrey, all studies after 2000, with study populations > 100 patients, including only patients > 18 years and follow-up > 30 days, were included. Two independent authors assessed the literature search and extracted the data. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. The meta-analysis was performed on complications pooled in infections, nonunion, symptomatic implant removal, and fixation failure.

Results: The data on complications were available from 14 studies, including a pool of 5659 patients. The most common complication was symptomatic implant removal, affecting.

Conclusion: Surgically, treatment of patella fractures was associated with a high risk of complications. The most common complication was symptomatic implant removal, affecting 29.6% of patients. Other complications stated were fixation failure 5.2%, infections 3.1% and nonunion 1.7%.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
髌骨骨折手术治疗后的并发症--系统回顾和比例荟萃分析。
目的:本系统综述和比例荟萃分析旨在确定髌骨骨折手术治疗的并发症,并估计其发生率。通过纳入几项最新的大规模研究,我们扩展了有关这一主题的现有知识:本系统综述和荟萃分析是根据《Cochrane干预措施系统综述手册》进行的。在对 PubMed、MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane Library 和 OpenGrey 进行检索后,纳入了 2000 年以后的所有研究,研究人群大于 100 名患者,仅包括大于 18 岁的患者,随访时间大于 30 天。两位独立作者对文献检索进行了评估并提取了数据。偏倚风险采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量评估量表进行评估。荟萃分析的并发症包括感染、不愈合、无症状植入物移除和固定失败:14项研究提供了并发症数据,包括5659名患者。最常见的并发症是无症状的假体移除,这对患者造成了影响:手术治疗髌骨骨折的并发症风险很高。最常见的并发症是无症状的植入物移除,影响了29.6%的患者。其他并发症包括固定失败5.2%、感染3.1%和不愈合1.7%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
311
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery aims to open an interdisciplinary forum that allows for the scientific exchange between basic and clinical science related to pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment of traumatized patients. The journal covers all aspects of clinical management, operative treatment and related research of traumatic injuries. Clinical and experimental papers on issues relevant for the improvement of trauma care are published. Reviews, original articles, short communications and letters allow the appropriate presentation of major and minor topics.
期刊最新文献
Non-operative treatment of metacarpal fractures and patient-reported outcomes: a multicentre snapshot study. Focus on challenges and advances in the treatment of traumatic brain injury. Publisher Correction: How does damage control strategy influence organ's suitability for donation after major trauma? A multi-institutional study. TBI related death has become the new epidemic in polytrauma: a 10-year prospective cohort analysis in severely injured patients Angioembolization in patients with blunt splenic trauma in Germany –guidelines vs. Reality a retrospective registry-based cohort study of the TraumaRegister DGU®
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1