Assessment of three criteria to establish borrelial infection in suspected lyme neuroborreliosis.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Infection Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1007/s15010-024-02338-2
Katarina Ogrinc, Petra Bogovič, Vera Maraspin, Stanka Lotrič Furlan, Tereza Rojko, Eva Ružić-Sabljić, Andrej Kastrin, Klemen Strle, Gary P Wormser, Franc Strle
{"title":"Assessment of three criteria to establish borrelial infection in suspected lyme neuroborreliosis.","authors":"Katarina Ogrinc, Petra Bogovič, Vera Maraspin, Stanka Lotrič Furlan, Tereza Rojko, Eva Ružić-Sabljić, Andrej Kastrin, Klemen Strle, Gary P Wormser, Franc Strle","doi":"10.1007/s15010-024-02338-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Diagnosis of (European) Lyme neuroborreliosis has been based on clinical presentation, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pleocytosis and demonstration of intrathecal borrelial antibody synthesis (ITBAS) to document Borrelia burgdorferi s. l.</p><p><strong>Infection: </strong>It is not known if other criteria to document Borrelia infection may contribute to the diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared the sensitivity of three individual criteria (ITBAS, CSF Borrelia culture, and the presence of erythema migrans [EM]) to confirm the diagnosis of early Lyme neuroborreliosis in 280 patients ≥ 15 years of age evaluated at a Lyme borreliosis outpatient clinic in Slovenia. The patients had either radicular pain of new onset or involvement of a cranial nerve but without radicular pain, each in conjunction with CSF pleocytosis. Evaluation was of patients who had each of the three confirmatory criteria assessed, and for whom at least one criterion was positive.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of 280 patients, 120 women and 160 men, median age 57 (range 15-84) years, revealed that ITBAS was the most frequently observed positive criterion (85.4%), followed by EM (52.9%), and by a positive CSF Borrelia culture (9.6%). Of the 280 patients, 154 (55%) met only one criterion (43.2% ITBAS only, 10.7% EM only, and 1.1% positive CSF culture only), whereas 42.1% met two criteria. Only 2.9% of patients were positive by all three criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although ITBAS was the most frequent criterion for confirmation for Borrelia infection, the presence of EM alone confirmed an additional 10.7% of patients and a positive CSF Borrelia culture alone added another 1.1%.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":" ","pages":"165-174"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11825597/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-024-02338-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Diagnosis of (European) Lyme neuroborreliosis has been based on clinical presentation, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pleocytosis and demonstration of intrathecal borrelial antibody synthesis (ITBAS) to document Borrelia burgdorferi s. l.

Infection: It is not known if other criteria to document Borrelia infection may contribute to the diagnosis.

Methods: We compared the sensitivity of three individual criteria (ITBAS, CSF Borrelia culture, and the presence of erythema migrans [EM]) to confirm the diagnosis of early Lyme neuroborreliosis in 280 patients ≥ 15 years of age evaluated at a Lyme borreliosis outpatient clinic in Slovenia. The patients had either radicular pain of new onset or involvement of a cranial nerve but without radicular pain, each in conjunction with CSF pleocytosis. Evaluation was of patients who had each of the three confirmatory criteria assessed, and for whom at least one criterion was positive.

Results: Analysis of 280 patients, 120 women and 160 men, median age 57 (range 15-84) years, revealed that ITBAS was the most frequently observed positive criterion (85.4%), followed by EM (52.9%), and by a positive CSF Borrelia culture (9.6%). Of the 280 patients, 154 (55%) met only one criterion (43.2% ITBAS only, 10.7% EM only, and 1.1% positive CSF culture only), whereas 42.1% met two criteria. Only 2.9% of patients were positive by all three criteria.

Conclusion: Although ITBAS was the most frequent criterion for confirmation for Borrelia infection, the presence of EM alone confirmed an additional 10.7% of patients and a positive CSF Borrelia culture alone added another 1.1%.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估确定疑似莱姆神经性包虫病患者包虫病感染的三个标准。
目的:(欧洲)莱姆神经包虫病的诊断一直基于临床表现、脑脊液(CSF)多形细胞增多和鞘内包柔氏抗体合成(ITBAS),以记录布氏包柔氏菌(Borrelia burgdorferi s.l.)感染:目前尚不清楚其他记录鲍瑞氏菌感染的标准是否有助于诊断:方法:我们比较了在斯洛文尼亚莱姆包虫病门诊接受评估的 280 名年龄≥ 15 岁的患者中,三项单独标准(ITBAS、CSF Borrelia 培养和偏头痛红斑 [EM])对确诊早期莱姆神经包虫病的敏感性。这些患者或有新发的根性疼痛,或有颅神经受累但无根性疼痛,且均伴有脑脊液多细胞增多。评估对象为符合三项确诊标准中的每项标准,且至少有一项标准呈阳性的患者:对 280 名患者进行的分析显示,ITBAS 是最常见的阳性标准(85.4%),其次是 EM(52.9%)和 CSF Borrelia 培养阳性(9.6%)。在 280 名患者中,154 人(55%)只符合一项标准(43.2% 只符合 ITBAS 标准,10.7% 只符合 EM 标准,1.1% 只符合 CSF 培养阳性标准),42.1% 的患者符合两项标准。只有 2.9% 的患者符合所有三个标准:尽管 ITBAS 是最常见的鲍曼不动杆菌感染确诊标准,但仅凭 EM 就能确诊的患者比例增加了 10.7%,仅凭 CSF 鲍曼不动杆菌培养阳性就能确诊的患者比例增加了 1.1%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Infection
Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
1.30%
发文量
224
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection is a journal dedicated to serving as a global forum for the presentation and discussion of clinically relevant information on infectious diseases. Its primary goal is to engage readers and contributors from various regions around the world in the exchange of knowledge about the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases, both in outpatient and inpatient settings. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including: Etiology: The study of the causes of infectious diseases. Pathogenesis: The process by which an infectious agent causes disease. Diagnosis: The methods and techniques used to identify infectious diseases. Treatment: The medical interventions and strategies employed to treat infectious diseases. Public Health: Issues of local, regional, or international significance related to infectious diseases, including prevention, control, and management strategies. Hospital Epidemiology: The study of the spread of infectious diseases within healthcare settings and the measures to prevent nosocomial infections. In addition to these, Infection also includes a specialized "Images" section, which focuses on high-quality visual content, such as images, photographs, and microscopic slides, accompanied by brief abstracts. This section is designed to highlight the clinical and diagnostic value of visual aids in the field of infectious diseases, as many conditions present with characteristic clinical signs that can be diagnosed through inspection, and imaging and microscopy are crucial for accurate diagnosis. The journal's comprehensive approach ensures that it remains a valuable resource for healthcare professionals and researchers in the field of infectious diseases.
期刊最新文献
Cardiac structure and function 1.5 years after COVID-19: results from the EPILOC study. Correction: Successful therapy of a newborn with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia nosocomial pneumonia with cefiderocol. Oral nonabsorbable antibiotics for prevention of recurrent cholangitis; a brief report study. Toxigenic Corynebacterium ulcerans in raw milk of a cow with acute mastitis: case report and historical review on milk-transmitted diphtheria. RSV is the main cause of severe respiratory infections in infants and young children in Germany - data from the prospective, multicenter PAPI study 2021-2023.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1