Neural basis of lower-limb visual feedback therapy: an EEG study in healthy subjects.

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1186/s12984-024-01408-8
Ahmed Adham, Ba Thien Le, Julien Bonnal, Hugo Bessaguet, Etienne Ojardias, Pascal Giraux, Pascal Auzou
{"title":"Neural basis of lower-limb visual feedback therapy: an EEG study in healthy subjects.","authors":"Ahmed Adham, Ba Thien Le, Julien Bonnal, Hugo Bessaguet, Etienne Ojardias, Pascal Giraux, Pascal Auzou","doi":"10.1186/s12984-024-01408-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Video-feedback observational therapy (VOT) is an intensive rehabilitation technique based on movement repetition and visualization that has shown benefits for motor rehabilitation of the upper and lower limbs. Despite an increase in recent literature on the neurophysiological effects of VOT in the upper limb, there is little knowledge about the cortical effects of visual feedback therapies when applied to the lower limbs. The aim of our study was to better understand the neurophysiological effects of VOT. Thus, we identified and compared the EEG biomarkers of healthy subjects undergoing lower limb VOT during three tasks: passive observation, observation and motor imagery, observation and motor execution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 38 healthy volunteers and monitored their EEG activity while they performed a right ankle dorsiflexion task in the VOT. Three graded motor tasks associated with action observation were tested: action observation alone (O), motor imagery with action observation (OI), and motor execution synchronized with action observation (OM). The alpha and beta event-related desynchronization (ERD) and event-related synchronization (or beta rebound, ERS) rhythms were used as biomarkers of cortical activation and compared between conditions with a permutation test. Changes in connectivity during the task were computed with phase locking value (PLV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the task, in the alpha band, the ERD was comparable between O and OI activities across the precentral, central and parietal electrodes. OM involved the same regions but had greater ERD over the central electrodes. In the beta band, there was a gradation of ERD intensity in O, OI and OM over central electrodes. After the task, the ERS changes were weak during the O task but were strong during the OI and OM (Cz) tasks, with no differences between OI and OM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Alpha band ERD results demonstrated the recruitment of mirror neurons during lower limb VOT due to visual feedback. Beta band ERD reflects strong recruitment of the sensorimotor cortex evoked by motor imagery and action execution. These results also emphasize the need for an active motor task, either motor imagery or motor execution task during VOT, to elicit a post-task ERS, which is absent during passive observation. Trial Registration NCT05743647.</p>","PeriodicalId":16384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11229246/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-024-01408-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Video-feedback observational therapy (VOT) is an intensive rehabilitation technique based on movement repetition and visualization that has shown benefits for motor rehabilitation of the upper and lower limbs. Despite an increase in recent literature on the neurophysiological effects of VOT in the upper limb, there is little knowledge about the cortical effects of visual feedback therapies when applied to the lower limbs. The aim of our study was to better understand the neurophysiological effects of VOT. Thus, we identified and compared the EEG biomarkers of healthy subjects undergoing lower limb VOT during three tasks: passive observation, observation and motor imagery, observation and motor execution.

Methods: We recruited 38 healthy volunteers and monitored their EEG activity while they performed a right ankle dorsiflexion task in the VOT. Three graded motor tasks associated with action observation were tested: action observation alone (O), motor imagery with action observation (OI), and motor execution synchronized with action observation (OM). The alpha and beta event-related desynchronization (ERD) and event-related synchronization (or beta rebound, ERS) rhythms were used as biomarkers of cortical activation and compared between conditions with a permutation test. Changes in connectivity during the task were computed with phase locking value (PLV).

Results: During the task, in the alpha band, the ERD was comparable between O and OI activities across the precentral, central and parietal electrodes. OM involved the same regions but had greater ERD over the central electrodes. In the beta band, there was a gradation of ERD intensity in O, OI and OM over central electrodes. After the task, the ERS changes were weak during the O task but were strong during the OI and OM (Cz) tasks, with no differences between OI and OM.

Conclusion: Alpha band ERD results demonstrated the recruitment of mirror neurons during lower limb VOT due to visual feedback. Beta band ERD reflects strong recruitment of the sensorimotor cortex evoked by motor imagery and action execution. These results also emphasize the need for an active motor task, either motor imagery or motor execution task during VOT, to elicit a post-task ERS, which is absent during passive observation. Trial Registration NCT05743647.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下肢视觉反馈疗法的神经基础:健康受试者的脑电图研究。
背景:视频反馈观察疗法(VOT)是一种基于动作重复和可视化的强化康复技术,已显示出对上下肢运动康复的益处。尽管最近有关 VOT 对上肢神经生理学影响的文献有所增加,但有关视觉反馈疗法应用于下肢时对大脑皮层影响的知识却很少。我们的研究旨在更好地了解 VOT 的神经生理效应。因此,我们确定并比较了接受下肢 VOT 的健康受试者在三项任务中的脑电图生物标志物:被动观察、观察和运动想象、观察和运动执行:我们招募了 38 名健康志愿者,当他们在 VOT 中执行右脚踝外展任务时,我们监测了他们的脑电图活动。测试了三种与动作观察相关的分级运动任务:单独动作观察(O)、动作观察与动作意象(OI)以及动作观察与动作执行同步(OM)。阿尔法和贝塔事件相关非同步化(ERD)和事件相关同步化(或贝塔反弹,ERS)节律被用作大脑皮层激活的生物标记,并通过置换检验对不同条件进行比较。用锁相值(PLV)计算任务期间连接性的变化:在任务过程中,在阿尔法波段,O 和 OI 在前中央、中央和顶叶电极上的 ERD 活动相当。OM 涉及相同的区域,但中央电极的 ERD 更大。在 beta 波段,O、OI 和 OM 在中央电极上的 ERD 强度呈梯度变化。任务结束后,O 任务期间的 ERS 变化较弱,但 OI 和 OM(Cz)任务期间的 ERS 变化较强,OI 和 OM 之间没有差异:阿尔法波段ERD结果表明,在下肢VOT过程中,视觉反馈会招募镜像神经元。贝塔波段ERD反映了运动想象和动作执行所引起的感觉运动皮层的强烈招募。这些结果还强调了在 VOT 过程中,需要积极的运动任务,无论是运动想象还是运动执行任务,才能引起任务后 ERS,而在被动观察过程中则没有 ERS。试验注册 NCT05743647。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.90%
发文量
122
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation considers manuscripts on all aspects of research that result from cross-fertilization of the fields of neuroscience, biomedical engineering, and physical medicine & rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of synergy extrapolation and static optimization for estimating multiple unmeasured muscle activations during walking. Immersive virtual reality for learning exoskeleton-like virtual walking: a feasibility study. Instrumented assessment of lower and upper motor neuron signs in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis using robotic manipulation: an explorative study. Rest the brain to learn new gait patterns after stroke. Effects of virtual reality rehabilitation after spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1