Current insights on social media as a tool for the dissemination of research and education in surgery: a narrative review.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Surgery Today Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1007/s00595-024-02891-1
Takehito Yamamoto, Kentaro Goto, Shoichi Kitano, Yurina Maeshima, Toshiyuki Yamada, Yoko Azuma, Shintaro Okumura, Naonori Kawakubo, Eiji Tanaka, Kazutaka Obama, Kojiro Taura, Hiroaki Terajima, Tatsuro Tajiri
{"title":"Current insights on social media as a tool for the dissemination of research and education in surgery: a narrative review.","authors":"Takehito Yamamoto, Kentaro Goto, Shoichi Kitano, Yurina Maeshima, Toshiyuki Yamada, Yoko Azuma, Shintaro Okumura, Naonori Kawakubo, Eiji Tanaka, Kazutaka Obama, Kojiro Taura, Hiroaki Terajima, Tatsuro Tajiri","doi":"10.1007/s00595-024-02891-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of our narrative review is to summarize the utilization of social media (SoMe) platforms for research communication within the field of surgery. We searched the PubMed database for articles in the last decade that discuss the utilization of SoMe in surgery and then categorized the diverse purposes of SoMe. SoMe proved to be a powerful tool for disseminating articles. Employing strategic methods like visual abstracts enhances article citation rates, the impact factor, h-index, and Altmetric score (an emerging alternative metric that comprehensively and instantly quantifies the social impact of scientific papers). SoMe also proved valuable for surgical education, with online videos shared widely for surgical training. However, it is essential to acknowledge the associated risk of inconsistency in quality. Moreover, SoMe facilitates discussion on specific topics through hashtags or closed groups and is instrumental in recruiting surgeons, with over half of general surgery residency programs in the US efficiently leveraging these platforms to attract the attention of potential candidates. Thus, there is a wealth of evidence supporting the effective use of SoMe for surgeons. In the contemporary era where SoMe is widely utilized, surgeons should be well-versed in this evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":22163,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11413125/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-024-02891-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of our narrative review is to summarize the utilization of social media (SoMe) platforms for research communication within the field of surgery. We searched the PubMed database for articles in the last decade that discuss the utilization of SoMe in surgery and then categorized the diverse purposes of SoMe. SoMe proved to be a powerful tool for disseminating articles. Employing strategic methods like visual abstracts enhances article citation rates, the impact factor, h-index, and Altmetric score (an emerging alternative metric that comprehensively and instantly quantifies the social impact of scientific papers). SoMe also proved valuable for surgical education, with online videos shared widely for surgical training. However, it is essential to acknowledge the associated risk of inconsistency in quality. Moreover, SoMe facilitates discussion on specific topics through hashtags or closed groups and is instrumental in recruiting surgeons, with over half of general surgery residency programs in the US efficiently leveraging these platforms to attract the attention of potential candidates. Thus, there is a wealth of evidence supporting the effective use of SoMe for surgeons. In the contemporary era where SoMe is widely utilized, surgeons should be well-versed in this evidence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于社交媒体作为外科研究和教育传播工具的当前见解:叙述性综述。
我们的叙述性综述旨在总结外科领域利用社交媒体(SoMe)平台进行研究交流的情况。我们在PubMed数据库中搜索了过去十年中讨论SoMe在外科领域应用的文章,然后对SoMe的不同用途进行了分类。事实证明,SoMe 是传播文章的有力工具。采用可视化摘要等策略方法可提高文章引用率、影响因子、h-index 和 Altmetric 分数(一种新兴的替代指标,可全面、即时地量化科学论文的社会影响)。事实证明,SoMe 对外科教育也很有价值,在线视频被广泛分享,用于外科培训。不过,必须承认质量不一致的相关风险。此外,SoMe 还通过标签或封闭群组促进了特定主题的讨论,并在招聘外科医生方面发挥了重要作用,美国一半以上的普通外科住院医师培训项目都在有效利用这些平台吸引潜在候选人的关注。因此,有大量证据支持外科医生有效使用 SoMe。在 SoMe 被广泛应用的当代,外科医生应该熟知这些证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Surgery Today
Surgery Today 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
208
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Surgery Today is the official journal of the Japan Surgical Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a place for the publication of high-quality papers documenting recent advances and new developments in all fields of surgery, both clinical and experimental. The journal welcomes original papers, review articles, and short communications, as well as short technical reports("How to do it"). The "How to do it" section will includes short articles on methods or techniques recommended for practical surgery. Papers submitted to the journal are reviewed by an international editorial board. Field of interest: All fields of surgery.
期刊最新文献
Is the use of direct oral anticoagulants after non-cardiac thoracic surgery safe for patients? Anemia rates after one-anastomosis gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Outcomes and pathologic response of primary lung cancer treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor/immune checkpoint inhibitor before salvage surgery. Simple pelvimetry predicts the pelvic manipulation time in robot-assisted low and ultra-low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Development of a laparoscopic sigmoidectomy simulator: Sigmaster.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1