Aflibercept or ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema.

Q2 Medicine Medical Hypothesis, Discovery, and Innovation in Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.51329/mehdiophthal1490
Mahmoud Abdelhalim Ali Ali, Hanan Saied Hegazy, Mohammed Othman Abdelkhalek Elsayed, Ehab Tharwat, Mona Nabeh Mansour, Mohamed Hassanein, Ezzeldin Ramadan Ezzeldin, Ashraf Mohammed GadElkareem, Essam Mahmoud Abd Ellateef, Ahmed A Elsayed, Ibrahim Hassan Elabd, Mahmoud H Abd Rbu, Ramy Saleh Amer, Abdel Ghany Ali El Gabbar, Hatem Mahmoud, Hazem Mohamed Abdelhameed, Amr Mohammed Elsayed Abdelkader
{"title":"Aflibercept or ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema.","authors":"Mahmoud Abdelhalim Ali Ali, Hanan Saied Hegazy, Mohammed Othman Abdelkhalek Elsayed, Ehab Tharwat, Mona Nabeh Mansour, Mohamed Hassanein, Ezzeldin Ramadan Ezzeldin, Ashraf Mohammed GadElkareem, Essam Mahmoud Abd Ellateef, Ahmed A Elsayed, Ibrahim Hassan Elabd, Mahmoud H Abd Rbu, Ramy Saleh Amer, Abdel Ghany Ali El Gabbar, Hatem Mahmoud, Hazem Mohamed Abdelhameed, Amr Mohammed Elsayed Abdelkader","doi":"10.51329/mehdiophthal1490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is the primary substance involved in retinal barrier breach. VEGF overexpression may cause diabetic macular edema (DME). Laser photocoagulation of the macula is the standard treatment for DME; however, recently, intravitreal anti-VEGF injections have surpassed laser treatment. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal injections of aflibercept or ranibizumab for managing treatment-naive DME.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, retrospective, interventional, comparative study included eyes with visual impairment due to treatment-naive DME that underwent intravitreal injection of either aflibercept 2 mg/0.05 mL or ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05 mL at Al-Azhar University Hospitals, Egypt between March 2023 and January 2024. Demographic data and full ophthalmological examination results at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months post-injection were collected, including the best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) notation, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, dilated fundoscopy, and central subfield thickness (CST) measured using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the 96 eyes of 96 patients with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of 57 (10) (range: 20-74) years and a male-to-female ratio of 1:2.7 were allocated to one of two groups with comparable age, sex, diabetes mellitus duration, and presence of other comorbidities (all <i>P</i> >0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in baseline diabetic retinopathy status or DME type between groups (both <i>P</i> >0.05). In both groups, the median (IQR) BCDVA significantly improved from 0.7 (0.8) logMAR at baseline to 0.4 (0.1) logMAR at 6 months post-injection (both <i>P</i> = 0.001), with no statistically significant difference between groups at all follow-up visits (all <i>P</i> >0.05). The median (IQR) CST significantly decreased in the aflibercept group from 347 (166) µm at baseline to 180 (233) µm at 6 months post-injection, and it decreased in the ranibizumab group from 360 (180) µm at baseline to 190 (224) µm at 6 months post-injection (both <i>P</i> = 0.001), with no statistically significant differences between groups at all follow-up visits (all <i>P</i> >0.05). No serious adverse effects were documented in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ranibizumab and aflibercept were equally effective in achieving the desired anatomical and functional results in patients with treatment-naïve DME in short-term follow-up without significant differences in injection counts between both drugs. Larger prospective, randomized, double-blinded trials with longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm our preliminary results.</p>","PeriodicalId":36524,"journal":{"name":"Medical Hypothesis, Discovery, and Innovation in Ophthalmology","volume":"13 1","pages":"16-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11227664/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Hypothesis, Discovery, and Innovation in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51329/mehdiophthal1490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is the primary substance involved in retinal barrier breach. VEGF overexpression may cause diabetic macular edema (DME). Laser photocoagulation of the macula is the standard treatment for DME; however, recently, intravitreal anti-VEGF injections have surpassed laser treatment. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal injections of aflibercept or ranibizumab for managing treatment-naive DME.

Methods: This single-center, retrospective, interventional, comparative study included eyes with visual impairment due to treatment-naive DME that underwent intravitreal injection of either aflibercept 2 mg/0.05 mL or ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05 mL at Al-Azhar University Hospitals, Egypt between March 2023 and January 2024. Demographic data and full ophthalmological examination results at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months post-injection were collected, including the best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) notation, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, dilated fundoscopy, and central subfield thickness (CST) measured using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

Results: Overall, the 96 eyes of 96 patients with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of 57 (10) (range: 20-74) years and a male-to-female ratio of 1:2.7 were allocated to one of two groups with comparable age, sex, diabetes mellitus duration, and presence of other comorbidities (all P >0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in baseline diabetic retinopathy status or DME type between groups (both P >0.05). In both groups, the median (IQR) BCDVA significantly improved from 0.7 (0.8) logMAR at baseline to 0.4 (0.1) logMAR at 6 months post-injection (both P = 0.001), with no statistically significant difference between groups at all follow-up visits (all P >0.05). The median (IQR) CST significantly decreased in the aflibercept group from 347 (166) µm at baseline to 180 (233) µm at 6 months post-injection, and it decreased in the ranibizumab group from 360 (180) µm at baseline to 190 (224) µm at 6 months post-injection (both P = 0.001), with no statistically significant differences between groups at all follow-up visits (all P >0.05). No serious adverse effects were documented in either group.

Conclusions: Ranibizumab and aflibercept were equally effective in achieving the desired anatomical and functional results in patients with treatment-naïve DME in short-term follow-up without significant differences in injection counts between both drugs. Larger prospective, randomized, double-blinded trials with longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm our preliminary results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aflibercept 或 ranibizumab 治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿。
背景:血管内皮生长因子(VEGF血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)是参与视网膜屏障破坏的主要物质。血管内皮生长因子过度表达可能导致糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)。激光光凝黄斑是治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的标准方法,但最近,玻璃体内抗血管内皮生长因子注射已超过了激光治疗。我们的目的是评估玻璃体内注射阿弗利百普或雷尼珠单抗对治疗无效的 DME 的疗效:这项单中心、回顾性、介入性比较研究纳入了2023年3月至2024年1月期间在埃及爱资哈尔大学医院接受阿弗利百普2毫克/0.05毫升或雷尼珠单抗0.5毫克/0.05毫升玻璃体内注射治疗的视力受损的非治疗性DME患者。研究人员收集了基线和注射后1、3、6个月的人口统计学数据和全面的眼科检查结果,包括以最小分辨角对数(logMAR)表示的最佳矫正距离视力(BCDVA)、裂隙灯生物显微镜检查、散瞳眼底镜检查以及使用光谱域光学相干断层扫描测量的中央子场厚度(CST):总的来说,96 名患者的 96 只眼睛被分配到了两组中的一组,两组患者的年龄、性别、糖尿病病程和是否患有其他合并症的情况相当(P 均大于 0.05),中位数(四分位数间距 [IQR])年龄为 57 (10)(范围:20-74)岁,男女比例为 1:2.7。两组间糖尿病视网膜病变的基线状态或 DME 类型无明显统计学差异(均 P >0.05)。两组患者的 BCDVA 中位数(IQR)均从基线时的 0.7 (0.8) logMAR 显著改善至注射后 6 个月时的 0.4 (0.1) logMAR(均为 P = 0.001),在所有随访中,组间差异均无统计学意义(均为 P >0.05)。阿夫利百普组的CST中位数(IQR)从基线时的347(166)µm显著下降到注射后6个月时的180(233)µm,而雷尼珠单抗组的CST中位数从基线时的360(180)µm下降到注射后6个月时的190(224)µm(均为P = 0.001),在所有随访中,组间差异均无统计学意义(均为P >0.05)。两组患者均未出现严重不良反应:结论:在短期随访中,雷珠单抗和阿夫利拜因对治疗无效的DME患者在获得理想的解剖和功能效果方面同样有效,两种药物的注射次数无明显差异。要证实我们的初步结果,还需要更大规模、更长随访期的前瞻性、随机、双盲试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Crocus sativus (saffron) and age-related macular degeneration. Application and interpretation of linear-regression analysis. Intraretinal hyperreflective line: potential biomarker in various retinal disorders. Multifocal electroretinogram changes after panretinal photocoagulation in early proliferative diabetic retinopathy. One-year outcomes after intraocular collamer lens implantation in hyperopic astigmatism: a retrospective single-center study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1