"It Has Improved My Practice to Be Able to Offer Alternative Treatments": A Longitudinal Qualitative Study of Oregon Medicaid Back Pain Providers.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1089/jicm.2023.0743
Mary Gray, Alexis Cooke, Catherine J Livingston, Kate LaForge, Diana P Flores, Esther K Choo
{"title":"\"It Has Improved My Practice to Be Able to Offer Alternative Treatments\": A Longitudinal Qualitative Study of Oregon Medicaid Back Pain Providers.","authors":"Mary Gray, Alexis Cooke, Catherine J Livingston, Kate LaForge, Diana P Flores, Esther K Choo","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2023.0743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> This study aimed to understand health care providers' experiences implementing the Oregon Back Pain Policy (OBPP) over time. The Medicaid OBPP expanded coverage of evidence-based nonpharmacological therapy (NPT) for back pain and restricted access to opioid therapy and interventional approaches. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The study included six online, asynchronous focus groups with providers in February 2020 (Time 1) and August 2022 (Time 2). Analysis was conducted with a longitudinal, recurrent cross-sectional approach. Analysis occurred in three stages: (1) An immersion/crystallization approach was used to analyze Time 1 focus group data, (2) reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyze Time 2 data, and (3) longitudinal analysis was used to integrate the findings across time points. <b><i>Results:</i></b> At Time 1, 48 clinicians and 44 NPT providers participated in the study. Time 2 included 63 clinicians and 59 NPT providers. The longitudinal analysis of the focus group data resulted in four themes: (1) general awareness of the policy, (2) providers support the policy and perceive a benefit to their patients, (3) barriers to NPT accessibility, and (4) barriers to referring patients to NPT. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The goal of the OBPP was to improve back pain care for Oregon Medicaid members by increasing access to evidence-based NPT and decreasing reliance on opioid medications. This study revealed that, although clinicians and NPT providers supported the policy, they faced persistent implementation challenges related to referrals, prior authorizations, coverage limitations, low reimbursement rates, and a reduced workforce for NPT providers. In some cases, implementation barriers were removed during the COVID-19 pandemic, but other challenges were more prominent during the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jicm.2023.0743","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to understand health care providers' experiences implementing the Oregon Back Pain Policy (OBPP) over time. The Medicaid OBPP expanded coverage of evidence-based nonpharmacological therapy (NPT) for back pain and restricted access to opioid therapy and interventional approaches. Methods: The study included six online, asynchronous focus groups with providers in February 2020 (Time 1) and August 2022 (Time 2). Analysis was conducted with a longitudinal, recurrent cross-sectional approach. Analysis occurred in three stages: (1) An immersion/crystallization approach was used to analyze Time 1 focus group data, (2) reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyze Time 2 data, and (3) longitudinal analysis was used to integrate the findings across time points. Results: At Time 1, 48 clinicians and 44 NPT providers participated in the study. Time 2 included 63 clinicians and 59 NPT providers. The longitudinal analysis of the focus group data resulted in four themes: (1) general awareness of the policy, (2) providers support the policy and perceive a benefit to their patients, (3) barriers to NPT accessibility, and (4) barriers to referring patients to NPT. Conclusion: The goal of the OBPP was to improve back pain care for Oregon Medicaid members by increasing access to evidence-based NPT and decreasing reliance on opioid medications. This study revealed that, although clinicians and NPT providers supported the policy, they faced persistent implementation challenges related to referrals, prior authorizations, coverage limitations, low reimbursement rates, and a reduced workforce for NPT providers. In some cases, implementation barriers were removed during the COVID-19 pandemic, but other challenges were more prominent during the pandemic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"能够提供替代疗法改善了我的工作":俄勒冈州医疗补助背痛提供者纵向定性研究》。
简介:本研究旨在了解医疗服务提供者在实施俄勒冈背痛政策(OBPP)过程中的经验。俄勒冈背痛政策》扩大了背痛循证非药物疗法 (NPT) 的覆盖范围,并限制了阿片类药物疗法和介入疗法的使用。研究方法:研究包括与医疗服务提供者在 2020 年 2 月(时间 1)和 2022 年 8 月(时间 2)进行的六次在线异步焦点小组讨论。分析采用纵向、重复横截面方法进行。分析分为三个阶段:(1) 采用沉浸/结晶法分析时间 1 的焦点小组数据,(2) 采用反思性专题分析法分析时间 2 的数据,(3) 采用纵向分析法整合各时间点的研究结果。结果:在时间 1,48 名临床医生和 44 名 NPT 提供者参与了研究。时间 2 包括 63 名临床医生和 59 名 NPT 提供者。对焦点小组数据的纵向分析产生了四个主题:(1) 对该政策的普遍认识,(2) 提供者支持该政策并认为对其患者有益,(3) NPT 可及性的障碍,以及 (4) 将患者转诊至 NPT 的障碍。结论:OBPP 的目标是通过提高循证 NPT 的可及性,减少对阿片类药物的依赖,从而改善俄勒冈州医疗补助成员的背痛护理。本研究表明,尽管临床医生和 NPT 提供者支持该政策,但他们在实施过程中仍面临转诊、事先授权、承保范围限制、报销率低以及 NPT 提供者劳动力减少等方面的挑战。在某些情况下,执行障碍在 COVID-19 大流行期间得以消除,但其他挑战在大流行期间则更为突出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integrative Health and Wellness Coaching: A Call to Action to Address a Research Gap for Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Mapping the Research Landscape: The Rise of Bibliometric Analysis in Integrative Medicine. Identifying Barriers to Implementing Complementary and Integrative Health Therapies in Rhode Island Health Care Systems: A Qualitative Approach. Effects of Mantram Repetition on Spiritual Well-Being: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Use of Complementary and Integrative Health Approaches in Adults with Long COVID in the US, a Nationally Representative Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1